书评:多语言测试与评估

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1177/02655322221114895
Beverly A. Baker
{"title":"书评:多语言测试与评估","authors":"Beverly A. Baker","doi":"10.1177/02655322221114895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From both a theoretical and an empirical perspective, this volume addresses the challenges of testing learners of multiple school language(s). The author states that “This volume is intended as a non-technical resource to offer help and guidance to all those who work in education with multilingual populations” (p. 1). In that sense, it is not a book about the assessment of language per se (although she presents a research study in which she collects information on students’ language proficiency). Rather, it is intended primarily for non-language specialists; to educators working with multilingual learners of all subjects. As she states throughout the work, the author addresses what she sees as limitations in both theoretical and empirical work that consider two languages only, claiming that this work has limited insights for those working with speakers of more than two languages. The author is motivated by the fair assessment of all students, including linguistically and culturally minoritized students. What follows are a summary and critical comments of the book, beginning with an overview of each of the chapters then directing a critical commentary to a few chapters in particular (Chapters 2, 5, and 7). Given the repetition of ideas across the chapters, I assume that many of these chapters have been designed to be read on a stand-alone basis. I have chosen these chapters to focus my comments because in my view they form the core of the book—they contain the theoretical approach undergirding the author’s work, the practical guidance in the form of the author’s “integrated approach,” and the details of her empirical study.","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":"40 1","pages":"184 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Multilingual Testing and Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Beverly A. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02655322221114895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From both a theoretical and an empirical perspective, this volume addresses the challenges of testing learners of multiple school language(s). The author states that “This volume is intended as a non-technical resource to offer help and guidance to all those who work in education with multilingual populations” (p. 1). In that sense, it is not a book about the assessment of language per se (although she presents a research study in which she collects information on students’ language proficiency). Rather, it is intended primarily for non-language specialists; to educators working with multilingual learners of all subjects. As she states throughout the work, the author addresses what she sees as limitations in both theoretical and empirical work that consider two languages only, claiming that this work has limited insights for those working with speakers of more than two languages. The author is motivated by the fair assessment of all students, including linguistically and culturally minoritized students. What follows are a summary and critical comments of the book, beginning with an overview of each of the chapters then directing a critical commentary to a few chapters in particular (Chapters 2, 5, and 7). Given the repetition of ideas across the chapters, I assume that many of these chapters have been designed to be read on a stand-alone basis. I have chosen these chapters to focus my comments because in my view they form the core of the book—they contain the theoretical approach undergirding the author’s work, the practical guidance in the form of the author’s “integrated approach,” and the details of her empirical study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Testing\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"184 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221114895\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221114895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从理论和经验的角度来看,本卷解决了测试多种学校语言学习者的挑战。作者指出,“本书旨在作为一种非技术资源,为所有从事多语言人群教育工作的人提供帮助和指导”(第1页)。从这个意义上说,它不是一本关于语言本身评估的书(尽管她提出了一项研究,其中她收集了有关学生语言能力的信息)。相反,它主要是为非语言专家设计的;与所有学科的多语种学习者一起工作的教育工作者。正如她在整部作品中所述,作者指出了她所认为的理论和实证工作的局限性,即只考虑两种语言,声称这项工作对那些使用两种以上语言的人的见解有限。作者的动机是公平评估所有学生,包括语言和文化上的少数民族学生。下面是对本书的总结和评论,从每章的概述开始,然后对特定的几章(第2、5和7章)进行评论。考虑到章节中思想的重复,我认为这些章节中的许多章节都是为了独立阅读而设计的。我选择这几章来集中评论,因为在我看来,它们构成了本书的核心——它们包含了支撑作者工作的理论方法,以作者“综合方法”的形式提供的实践指导,以及她的实证研究的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Multilingual Testing and Assessment
From both a theoretical and an empirical perspective, this volume addresses the challenges of testing learners of multiple school language(s). The author states that “This volume is intended as a non-technical resource to offer help and guidance to all those who work in education with multilingual populations” (p. 1). In that sense, it is not a book about the assessment of language per se (although she presents a research study in which she collects information on students’ language proficiency). Rather, it is intended primarily for non-language specialists; to educators working with multilingual learners of all subjects. As she states throughout the work, the author addresses what she sees as limitations in both theoretical and empirical work that consider two languages only, claiming that this work has limited insights for those working with speakers of more than two languages. The author is motivated by the fair assessment of all students, including linguistically and culturally minoritized students. What follows are a summary and critical comments of the book, beginning with an overview of each of the chapters then directing a critical commentary to a few chapters in particular (Chapters 2, 5, and 7). Given the repetition of ideas across the chapters, I assume that many of these chapters have been designed to be read on a stand-alone basis. I have chosen these chapters to focus my comments because in my view they form the core of the book—they contain the theoretical approach undergirding the author’s work, the practical guidance in the form of the author’s “integrated approach,” and the details of her empirical study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Can language test providers do more to support open science? A response to Winke Considerations to promote and accelerate Open Science: A response to Winke Evaluating the impact of nonverbal behavior on language ability ratings Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing Open Science in language assessment research contexts: A reply to Winke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1