第四拉特兰理事会1215年,禁止新的宗教秩序,和宗教妇女

IF 0.2 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures Pub Date : 2018-02-21 DOI:10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.1.0001
E. Freeman
{"title":"第四拉特兰理事会1215年,禁止新的宗教秩序,和宗教妇女","authors":"E. Freeman","doi":"10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article investigates canon 13 of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), arguing that scholars have been too ready to interpret the canon as a prohibition against new religious orders. By examining the difference between religio and ordo, and by examining the broader context of reform movements within western Christendom in the long twelfth century, including Innocent III's actions as well as grassroots initiatives, this article notes that canon 13 did not ban new orders and that it was not as restrictive as it has been considered. While this article is not the first to note this, the implications of such a reassessment still deserve more scrutiny, including the implications for women in particular. A more flexible appreciation of the context of corporate religious life out of which canon 13 grew, and to which it contributed, helps us to understand better the religious lives of thirteenth-century women, including Beguines.","PeriodicalId":40395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, the Prohibition against New Religious Orders, and Religious Women\",\"authors\":\"E. Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.1.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article investigates canon 13 of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), arguing that scholars have been too ready to interpret the canon as a prohibition against new religious orders. By examining the difference between religio and ordo, and by examining the broader context of reform movements within western Christendom in the long twelfth century, including Innocent III's actions as well as grassroots initiatives, this article notes that canon 13 did not ban new orders and that it was not as restrictive as it has been considered. While this article is not the first to note this, the implications of such a reassessment still deserve more scrutiny, including the implications for women in particular. A more flexible appreciation of the context of corporate religious life out of which canon 13 grew, and to which it contributed, helps us to understand better the religious lives of thirteenth-century women, including Beguines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.1.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了第四次拉特兰大公会议(1215)的教规13,认为学者们太容易将教规解释为对新宗教秩序的禁止。通过考察religio和ordo之间的差异,以及考察12世纪西方基督教世界改革运动的更广泛背景,包括英诺森三世的行动和基层倡议,本文指出,教规13并没有禁止新命令,也不像人们认为的那样具有限制性。虽然这篇文章不是第一个注意到这一点,但这种重新评估的含义仍然值得更多的审视,尤其是对女性的影响。更灵活地理解《正典》13所产生的集体宗教生活背景,有助于我们更好地理解13世纪女性的宗教生活,包括贝吉妮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, the Prohibition against New Religious Orders, and Religious Women
abstract:This article investigates canon 13 of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), arguing that scholars have been too ready to interpret the canon as a prohibition against new religious orders. By examining the difference between religio and ordo, and by examining the broader context of reform movements within western Christendom in the long twelfth century, including Innocent III's actions as well as grassroots initiatives, this article notes that canon 13 did not ban new orders and that it was not as restrictive as it has been considered. While this article is not the first to note this, the implications of such a reassessment still deserve more scrutiny, including the implications for women in particular. A more flexible appreciation of the context of corporate religious life out of which canon 13 grew, and to which it contributed, helps us to understand better the religious lives of thirteenth-century women, including Beguines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Translating Christ in the Middle Ages: Gender, Authorship, and the Visionary Text by Barbara Zimbalist (review) Encountering The Book of Margery Kempe The Fifteen Oes and Other Prayers: Edited from the Text Published by William Caxton (1491) ed. by Alexandra Barratt and Susan Powell (review) "Sowe ye yt together as ye may": Textile Images as Meditational Stimuli in Fifteenth-Century English Bridgettine Writings The Rood in Medieval Britain and Ireland, c.800–c.1500
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1