等级制度下的政策企业家精神:中国的国家行为体如何改变政策

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Chinese Governance Pub Date : 2021-01-17 DOI:10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207
Chun-sheng Shi, É. Frenkiel
{"title":"等级制度下的政策企业家精神:中国的国家行为体如何改变政策","authors":"Chun-sheng Shi, É. Frenkiel","doi":"10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How do actors develop entrepreneurial activities to bring about policy change? To what extent do the contexts in which they are embedded shape their behaviors? Relying on three comparative case studies, we use the structure-, institution- and agent-based analytical framework to investigate the complex and dynamic interactions between contexts and actors in the process of policy change initiated by state actors in authoritarian China. We propose a conceptual framework, ‘policy entrepreneurship under hierarchy’, which highlights the influence of power domination during the policy change process. It allows us to offer a renewed definition of policy entrepreneur and to identify a pattern of successful policy entrepreneurship in contrast to the ‘four central elements’ suggested by Mintrom and Nomann. We conclude that hierarchical policy entrepreneurship in China is displayed through two kinds of relationship: the proposal-approval between policy entrepreneurs and their superiors; and the instruction-execution between policy entrepreneurs and their subordinates.","PeriodicalId":45091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Governance","volume":"6 1","pages":"351 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy entrepreneurship under hierarchy: how state actors change policies in China\",\"authors\":\"Chun-sheng Shi, É. Frenkiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract How do actors develop entrepreneurial activities to bring about policy change? To what extent do the contexts in which they are embedded shape their behaviors? Relying on three comparative case studies, we use the structure-, institution- and agent-based analytical framework to investigate the complex and dynamic interactions between contexts and actors in the process of policy change initiated by state actors in authoritarian China. We propose a conceptual framework, ‘policy entrepreneurship under hierarchy’, which highlights the influence of power domination during the policy change process. It allows us to offer a renewed definition of policy entrepreneur and to identify a pattern of successful policy entrepreneurship in contrast to the ‘four central elements’ suggested by Mintrom and Nomann. We conclude that hierarchical policy entrepreneurship in China is displayed through two kinds of relationship: the proposal-approval between policy entrepreneurs and their superiors; and the instruction-execution between policy entrepreneurs and their subordinates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Governance\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"351 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1871207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

参与者如何开展创业活动以带来政策变化?他们所处的环境在多大程度上塑造了他们的行为?通过三个比较案例研究,我们使用基于结构、制度和主体的分析框架来研究专制中国国家行为者发起的政策变化过程中,背景和行为者之间复杂而动态的相互作用。我们提出了一个概念框架,即“等级制度下的政策企业家精神”,该框架强调了权力支配在政策变化过程中的影响。它使我们能够重新定义政策企业家,并识别出一种成功的政策企业家模式,与Mintrom和Nomann提出的“四个核心要素”形成对比。研究发现,中国的层级型政策企业家精神表现为两种关系:政策企业家与上级之间的提案批准关系;以及政策企业家与其下属之间的指令执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Policy entrepreneurship under hierarchy: how state actors change policies in China
Abstract How do actors develop entrepreneurial activities to bring about policy change? To what extent do the contexts in which they are embedded shape their behaviors? Relying on three comparative case studies, we use the structure-, institution- and agent-based analytical framework to investigate the complex and dynamic interactions between contexts and actors in the process of policy change initiated by state actors in authoritarian China. We propose a conceptual framework, ‘policy entrepreneurship under hierarchy’, which highlights the influence of power domination during the policy change process. It allows us to offer a renewed definition of policy entrepreneur and to identify a pattern of successful policy entrepreneurship in contrast to the ‘four central elements’ suggested by Mintrom and Nomann. We conclude that hierarchical policy entrepreneurship in China is displayed through two kinds of relationship: the proposal-approval between policy entrepreneurs and their superiors; and the instruction-execution between policy entrepreneurs and their subordinates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualizing policy change in China: from soft to harder forms of law in the household registration system reform Administrative states as moral hazards: four dimensions Party-led public participation in neighborhood governance: a comparative analysis of two forms of social networks Beyond state law: everyday rules and the fragile public Does china’s national carbon market function well? A perspective on effective market design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1