如果你建了,他们会通过吗?三种大型温水鱼类的通航效率系统评价

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1139/cjfas-2023-0030
Kayla Kelley, E. Gilbert, C. Pennock, M. McKinstry, P. Mackinnon, S. Durst, N. R. Franssen
{"title":"如果你建了,他们会通过吗?三种大型温水鱼类的通航效率系统评价","authors":"Kayla Kelley, E. Gilbert, C. Pennock, M. McKinstry, P. Mackinnon, S. Durst, N. R. Franssen","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fish passages are constructed to facilitate movement around barriers, but few are quantitatively evaluated for non-salmonids. We quantified the efficiency of a selective, nature-like fish passage for three native fishes, Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), in the San Juan River, NM, USA by estimating probabilities of completing three navigational phases and associated delay times. We compared passage efficiency in years when fish were captured in a trap and manually moved upstream to years when the trap was removed in the spring. All species were less efficient at navigating the attraction and exit phases compared to the ascent phase. Operating the passage without the trap generally increased passage success and shortened delay times. Mean probability of passage and delay time among species when the trap was removed ranged from 34–55% and 5–21 days, respectively. Our results suggest species- and phase-specific variation in passage efficiency and highlight the need for evaluations to aid future passage design and operation for a greater diversity of fishes.","PeriodicalId":9515,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If you build it, will they pass? A systematic evaluation of fish passage efficiency for three large-bodied warm-water fishes\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Kelley, E. Gilbert, C. Pennock, M. McKinstry, P. Mackinnon, S. Durst, N. R. Franssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjfas-2023-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fish passages are constructed to facilitate movement around barriers, but few are quantitatively evaluated for non-salmonids. We quantified the efficiency of a selective, nature-like fish passage for three native fishes, Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), in the San Juan River, NM, USA by estimating probabilities of completing three navigational phases and associated delay times. We compared passage efficiency in years when fish were captured in a trap and manually moved upstream to years when the trap was removed in the spring. All species were less efficient at navigating the attraction and exit phases compared to the ascent phase. Operating the passage without the trap generally increased passage success and shortened delay times. Mean probability of passage and delay time among species when the trap was removed ranged from 34–55% and 5–21 days, respectively. Our results suggest species- and phase-specific variation in passage efficiency and highlight the need for evaluations to aid future passage design and operation for a greater diversity of fishes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鱼类通道的建造是为了方便在屏障周围移动,但很少对非鲑科鱼类进行定量评估。通过估算完成三个航行阶段的概率和相关的延迟时间,我们量化了美国新墨西哥州圣胡安河三种本地鱼类——科罗拉多梭子鱼(Ptychocheilus lucius)、绒嘴吸盘(Catostomus latipinnis)和razorback吸盘(Xyrauchen texanus)的选择性、类似自然的鱼类通道的效率。我们比较了用捕鱼器捕获鱼并人工向上游移动的年份和春季将捕鱼器移走的年份的通过效率。与上升阶段相比,所有物种在吸引和退出阶段的导航效率都较低。在没有疏水阀的情况下操作通道通常会增加通过成功率并缩短延迟时间。去除捕集器后,各物种的平均通过概率为34 ~ 55%,平均滞留时间为5 ~ 21 d。我们的研究结果表明了通道效率的物种和阶段特异性变化,并强调了评估的必要性,以帮助未来的通道设计和操作,以适应更大的鱼类多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
If you build it, will they pass? A systematic evaluation of fish passage efficiency for three large-bodied warm-water fishes
Fish passages are constructed to facilitate movement around barriers, but few are quantitatively evaluated for non-salmonids. We quantified the efficiency of a selective, nature-like fish passage for three native fishes, Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), in the San Juan River, NM, USA by estimating probabilities of completing three navigational phases and associated delay times. We compared passage efficiency in years when fish were captured in a trap and manually moved upstream to years when the trap was removed in the spring. All species were less efficient at navigating the attraction and exit phases compared to the ascent phase. Operating the passage without the trap generally increased passage success and shortened delay times. Mean probability of passage and delay time among species when the trap was removed ranged from 34–55% and 5–21 days, respectively. Our results suggest species- and phase-specific variation in passage efficiency and highlight the need for evaluations to aid future passage design and operation for a greater diversity of fishes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences is the primary publishing vehicle for the multidisciplinary field of aquatic sciences. It publishes perspectives (syntheses, critiques, and re-evaluations), discussions (comments and replies), articles, and rapid communications, relating to current research on -omics, cells, organisms, populations, ecosystems, or processes that affect aquatic systems. The journal seeks to amplify, modify, question, or redirect accumulated knowledge in the field of fisheries and aquatic science.
期刊最新文献
Variation in estuary use patterns of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Fraser River, BC Declines and shifts in morphological diversity of ciscoes (Coregonus spp.) in lakes Huron and Michigan, 1917–2019 An integrative approach to assessing bridle shiner (Notropis bifrenatus) distribution using environmental DNA and traditional techniques Small pelagic fish: new frontiers in science and sustainable management Synchrony of alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus, year-class strength in the Great Lakes region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1