产后有乳头疼痛的妇女,660 nm光生物调节治疗(PBMT)与假PBMT相比是否能减轻母乳喂养时的疼痛?COVID-19期间的病例系列

Q2 Medicine Laser therapy Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.4081/ltj.2023.315
Monique Ralph, C. Hurst, S. Guyatt, Kathleen Goldsmith, E. Laakso
{"title":"产后有乳头疼痛的妇女,660 nm光生物调节治疗(PBMT)与假PBMT相比是否能减轻母乳喂养时的疼痛?COVID-19期间的病例系列","authors":"Monique Ralph, C. Hurst, S. Guyatt, Kathleen Goldsmith, E. Laakso","doi":"10.4081/ltj.2023.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analgesic role of PBMT for breastfeeding women with nipple pain is inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of PBMT at 660 nm in postnatal women with nipple pain planning to exclusively breastfeed. A randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study was initiated at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia on the inpatient maternity wards from May 2020 to September 2020. Eligible participants were randomised into two groups, an intervention group receiving usual care and PBMT (Group A) and a control group receiving usual care and sham PBMT (Group B). Usual care involved consultation with a midwife and/or lactation consultant to assist with infant latching and breastfeeding positioning. PBMT (660 nm; 250 Hz; 17 mW; 0.5 cm2 spot size) was administered three times within 24 hours. Nipple pain was the primary outcome measure analysed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) and the participants’ perceived efficacy of treatment were secondary outcome measures evaluated using the PROMIS Global Short Form and a combined 5-point Likert scale and thematic analysis, respectively. Due to the impact of COVID-19, only 10 participants were recruited. Compared to sham, three applications of PBMT at 660 nm provided no significant difference to participants’ nipple pain, QoL or perceived efficacy of treatment. Three key themes of PBMT treatment were simplicity, safety and support. This study was unable to demonstrate the impact of PBMT at 660 nm on relieving nipple pain due to low participant numbers. An adequately powered RCT with COVID-19 modifications, is recommended.","PeriodicalId":17981,"journal":{"name":"Laser therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In postnatal women with nipple pain, does photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) at 660 nm compared with sham PBMT reduce pain on breastfeeding? A case series during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Monique Ralph, C. Hurst, S. Guyatt, Kathleen Goldsmith, E. Laakso\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ltj.2023.315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analgesic role of PBMT for breastfeeding women with nipple pain is inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of PBMT at 660 nm in postnatal women with nipple pain planning to exclusively breastfeed. A randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study was initiated at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia on the inpatient maternity wards from May 2020 to September 2020. Eligible participants were randomised into two groups, an intervention group receiving usual care and PBMT (Group A) and a control group receiving usual care and sham PBMT (Group B). Usual care involved consultation with a midwife and/or lactation consultant to assist with infant latching and breastfeeding positioning. PBMT (660 nm; 250 Hz; 17 mW; 0.5 cm2 spot size) was administered three times within 24 hours. Nipple pain was the primary outcome measure analysed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) and the participants’ perceived efficacy of treatment were secondary outcome measures evaluated using the PROMIS Global Short Form and a combined 5-point Likert scale and thematic analysis, respectively. Due to the impact of COVID-19, only 10 participants were recruited. Compared to sham, three applications of PBMT at 660 nm provided no significant difference to participants’ nipple pain, QoL or perceived efficacy of treatment. Three key themes of PBMT treatment were simplicity, safety and support. This study was unable to demonstrate the impact of PBMT at 660 nm on relieving nipple pain due to low participant numbers. An adequately powered RCT with COVID-19 modifications, is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PBMT对哺乳妇女乳头疼痛的镇痛作用尚无定论。本研究旨在确定产后660 nm乳头疼痛妇女计划纯母乳喂养的PBMT的疗效。2020年5月至2020年9月,在澳大利亚布里斯班的一家三级医院对住院产科病房进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照临床研究。符合条件的参与者被随机分为两组,接受常规护理和PBMT的干预组(A组)和接受常规护理和假PBMT的对照组(B组)。常规护理包括与助产士和/或哺乳顾问咨询,以协助婴儿锁定和母乳喂养定位。PBMT (660 nm;250赫兹;17个兆瓦;0.5 cm2斑点大小),24小时内给药3次。乳头疼痛是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析的主要结局指标。生活质量(QoL)和参与者对治疗的感知疗效是次要的结果指标,分别使用PROMIS全球简短表格和综合5点李克特量表和主题分析进行评估。由于新冠肺炎疫情的影响,只招募了10名参与者。与假手术相比,在660 nm处三次应用PBMT对参与者的乳头疼痛、生活质量或治疗效果没有显著差异。PBMT治疗的三个关键主题是简单、安全和支持。由于参与者人数少,本研究无法证明660nm的PBMT对缓解乳头疼痛的影响。建议使用经过COVID-19修改的足够功率的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In postnatal women with nipple pain, does photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) at 660 nm compared with sham PBMT reduce pain on breastfeeding? A case series during COVID-19
The analgesic role of PBMT for breastfeeding women with nipple pain is inconclusive. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of PBMT at 660 nm in postnatal women with nipple pain planning to exclusively breastfeed. A randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study was initiated at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia on the inpatient maternity wards from May 2020 to September 2020. Eligible participants were randomised into two groups, an intervention group receiving usual care and PBMT (Group A) and a control group receiving usual care and sham PBMT (Group B). Usual care involved consultation with a midwife and/or lactation consultant to assist with infant latching and breastfeeding positioning. PBMT (660 nm; 250 Hz; 17 mW; 0.5 cm2 spot size) was administered three times within 24 hours. Nipple pain was the primary outcome measure analysed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) and the participants’ perceived efficacy of treatment were secondary outcome measures evaluated using the PROMIS Global Short Form and a combined 5-point Likert scale and thematic analysis, respectively. Due to the impact of COVID-19, only 10 participants were recruited. Compared to sham, three applications of PBMT at 660 nm provided no significant difference to participants’ nipple pain, QoL or perceived efficacy of treatment. Three key themes of PBMT treatment were simplicity, safety and support. This study was unable to demonstrate the impact of PBMT at 660 nm on relieving nipple pain due to low participant numbers. An adequately powered RCT with COVID-19 modifications, is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laser therapy
Laser therapy Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness of two wavelengths of 810 and 980 nm Diode laser with two different beam profiles on tooth discoloration in bleaching: an experimental study Low-intensity laser-assisted antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and intravascular laser irradiation of blood in oncology: systematic review and a brief report Biomechanical changes after keratorefractive lenticule extraction with CLEAR and after femtosecond LASIK, correlated with optical coherence tomography findings Frequency-doubled neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser trabeculoplasty as adjuvant therapy for open-angle glaucomas Pre-prosthetic atraumatic laser-assisted mandibular rehabilitation: Er,Cr:YSGG 2780 nm for alveoloplasty and mucocele removal. A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1