创造、管理和贬值——考察17世纪瑞典南部草甸经济的运作

Q1 Arts and Humanities Landscape History Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/01433768.2023.2196124
Ådel Franzén, O. Jacobsson
{"title":"创造、管理和贬值——考察17世纪瑞典南部草甸经济的运作","authors":"Ådel Franzén, O. Jacobsson","doi":"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Meadow land use has been the object of very limited historical research in Sweden, as most studies have focused on ecological or functional aspects. Research on the economy of meadows is rare. This paper addresses this issue by studying the investment in, and management of, meadows in seventeenth-century Sweden considering landesque capital, a concept referring to long-term investments in land through labour. We also examine the local economic institutions developed to handle this type of capital. By analysing seventeenth-century century court records from the districts of Östra, Redväg and Kind, a more complete picture emerges of the processes and contexts in which meadows were created, managed and devalued / revalued over time. Meadow capital was constantly under threat of degeneration due to biophysical processes, and this paper explores the different strategies used to handle this problem. Outlying meadows were often more flexible in terms of ownership and were often used by others when abandoned, either by agreement or surreptitiously, which frequently led to future ownership conflicts. The comparatively limited number of cases relating to meadows nonetheless emphasises the fairly low transaction costs incurred by institutions related to meadow land use at this time. It was often the outlying meadows that appeared in court proceedings, most likely related to these meadows not being contiguous to the rest of the land of the person using them as well as these meadows having a more dynamic owner/usership history compared to infield meadows.","PeriodicalId":39639,"journal":{"name":"Landscape History","volume":"44 1","pages":"83 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creation, management and devaluation – examining the workings of the seventeenth-century meadow economy in southern Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Ådel Franzén, O. Jacobsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Meadow land use has been the object of very limited historical research in Sweden, as most studies have focused on ecological or functional aspects. Research on the economy of meadows is rare. This paper addresses this issue by studying the investment in, and management of, meadows in seventeenth-century Sweden considering landesque capital, a concept referring to long-term investments in land through labour. We also examine the local economic institutions developed to handle this type of capital. By analysing seventeenth-century century court records from the districts of Östra, Redväg and Kind, a more complete picture emerges of the processes and contexts in which meadows were created, managed and devalued / revalued over time. Meadow capital was constantly under threat of degeneration due to biophysical processes, and this paper explores the different strategies used to handle this problem. Outlying meadows were often more flexible in terms of ownership and were often used by others when abandoned, either by agreement or surreptitiously, which frequently led to future ownership conflicts. The comparatively limited number of cases relating to meadows nonetheless emphasises the fairly low transaction costs incurred by institutions related to meadow land use at this time. It was often the outlying meadows that appeared in court proceedings, most likely related to these meadows not being contiguous to the rest of the land of the person using them as well as these meadows having a more dynamic owner/usership history compared to infield meadows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape History\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"83 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

草甸土地利用在瑞典一直是非常有限的历史研究对象,因为大多数研究都集中在生态或功能方面。关于草甸经济的研究很少。本文通过研究17世纪瑞典对草地的投资和管理来解决这个问题,并考虑到土地资本(指通过劳动力对土地进行长期投资的概念)。我们还考察了为处理这类资本而发展起来的地方经济机构。通过分析来自Östra, Redväg和Kind地区的17世纪法庭记录,可以更全面地了解草地的创建,管理以及随着时间的推移贬值/重估的过程和背景。由于生物物理过程的原因,草地资本不断受到退化的威胁,本文探讨了应对这一问题的不同策略。偏远的草地在所有权方面往往更灵活,在被协议或秘密放弃时,经常被其他人使用,这经常导致未来的所有权冲突。尽管如此,与草甸有关的案件数量相对有限,这突显出此时与草甸土地使用有关的机构所产生的交易成本相当低。通常是外围草地出现在法庭诉讼中,最有可能的原因是这些草地与使用它们的人的其余土地不相邻,而且与内场草地相比,这些草地具有更动态的所有者/用户历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creation, management and devaluation – examining the workings of the seventeenth-century meadow economy in southern Sweden
ABSTRACT Meadow land use has been the object of very limited historical research in Sweden, as most studies have focused on ecological or functional aspects. Research on the economy of meadows is rare. This paper addresses this issue by studying the investment in, and management of, meadows in seventeenth-century Sweden considering landesque capital, a concept referring to long-term investments in land through labour. We also examine the local economic institutions developed to handle this type of capital. By analysing seventeenth-century century court records from the districts of Östra, Redväg and Kind, a more complete picture emerges of the processes and contexts in which meadows were created, managed and devalued / revalued over time. Meadow capital was constantly under threat of degeneration due to biophysical processes, and this paper explores the different strategies used to handle this problem. Outlying meadows were often more flexible in terms of ownership and were often used by others when abandoned, either by agreement or surreptitiously, which frequently led to future ownership conflicts. The comparatively limited number of cases relating to meadows nonetheless emphasises the fairly low transaction costs incurred by institutions related to meadow land use at this time. It was often the outlying meadows that appeared in court proceedings, most likely related to these meadows not being contiguous to the rest of the land of the person using them as well as these meadows having a more dynamic owner/usership history compared to infield meadows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape History
Landscape History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Roman to early medieval cereal farming in the Rhineland: weeds, tillage, and the spread of the mouldboard plough. Landscapes of the Norman Conquest (Pen & Sword Archaeology, Barnsley, 2022) Environments of Identity. Agricultural community, work and concepts of local in Yorkshire, 1918–2018 (The White Horse Press, Winwick, 2022) Landscape Research The Doctor’s Garden: medicine, science, and horticulture in Britain (Yale University Press, London, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1