现场海洋资料同化在ECMWF热带太平洋海温和MLD亚季节预报中的作用

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1002/qj.4570
Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff
{"title":"现场海洋资料同化在ECMWF热带太平洋海温和MLD亚季节预报中的作用","authors":"Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff","doi":"10.1002/qj.4570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of in‐situ ocean data assimilation in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts of SST and MLD over the tropical Pacific Ocean\",\"authors\":\"Ho‐Hsuan Wei, Aneesh C. Subramanian, K. Karnauskas, Danni Du, M. Balmaseda, Beena B. Sarojini, F. Vitart, C. DeMott, M. Mazloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带太平洋通过其主导海温空间结构和ENSO、MJO等主导气候模态及其遥相关对全球气候起着重要的调节作用。这些变率模态,包括它们的海洋异常,被认为是热带地区亚季节时间尺度预测技能的来源。因此,本研究旨在探讨同化原位海洋观测对初始海表温度(SST)和混合层深度(MLD)及其亚季节预报的影响。我们分析了欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)综合预报系统(IFS)生成的两个亚季节预报系统,其中海洋状态是通过两次观测系统实验(OSE)再分析初始化的。我们发现,同化和不同化海洋资料预报之间的海温差异随着时间的推移而增加,导致同化海洋观测时冷舌偏差减少。两种与海气耦合有关的机制被认为有助于海温差异的增长。一个是纬向海温梯度、气压梯度和地面风之间的正反馈。另一种是由于地面风速的不同而导致赤道处的埃克曼吸力和混合的差异。虽然初始混合层深度(MLD)可以通过海洋资料同化得到改善,但这种改善在预报中无法保持。相反,两个实验中的MLD在预测开始时迅速变浅。这些结果强调了初始化和模式偏差如何影响海气相互作用和热带太平洋亚季节预报的准确性。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of in‐situ ocean data assimilation in ECMWF subseasonal forecasts of SST and MLD over the tropical Pacific Ocean
The tropical Pacific plays an important role in modulating the global climate through its prevailing sea surface temperature spatial structure and dominant climate modes like ENSO, MJO, and their teleconnections. These modes of variability, including their oceanic anomalies, are considered to provide sources of prediction skill on subseasonal timescales in the tropics. Therefore, this study aims to examine how assimilating in‐situ ocean observations influences the initial ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth (MLD) and their subseasonal forecasts. We analyze two subseasonal forecast systems generated with European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) where the ocean states were initialized using two Observing System Experiment (OSE) reanalyses. We find that the SST differences between forecasts with and without ocean data assimilation grow with time, resulting in a reduced cold tongue bias when assimilating ocean observations. Two mechanisms related to air‐sea coupling are considered to contribute to this growth of SST differences. One is a positive feedback between zonal SST gradient, pressure gradient, and surface wind. The other is the difference in Ekman suction and mixing at the equator due to surface wind speed differences. While the initial mixed layer depth (MLD) can be improved through ocean data assimilation, this improvement is not maintained in the forecasts. Instead, the MLD in both experiments rapidly shoals at the beginning of the forecast. These results emphasize how initialization and model biases influence the air‐sea interaction and the accuracy of subseasonal forecast in the tropical Pacific.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts Relationship between vertical variation of cloud microphysical properties and thickness of the entrainment interfacial layer in Physics of Stratocumulus Top stratocumulus clouds Characteristics and trends of Atlantic tropical cyclones that do and do not develop from African easterly waves Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models First trial for the assimilation of radiance data from MTVZA‐GY on board the new Russian satellite meteor‐M N2‐2 in the CMA‐GFS 4D‐VAR system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1