使用基于全国调查的风险计算器对接受大肝切除术患者术后死亡率的机构实际利用率

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY International surgery Pub Date : 2021-03-30 DOI:10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00041.1
A. Nanashima, N. Imamura, M. Hiyoshi, K. Yano, T. Hamada, T. Nishida, Daichi Sakurahara, R. Sakamoto, Yukako Uchise, T. Wada, Kenzo Nagatomo
{"title":"使用基于全国调查的风险计算器对接受大肝切除术患者术后死亡率的机构实际利用率","authors":"A. Nanashima, N. Imamura, M. Hiyoshi, K. Yano, T. Hamada, T. Nishida, Daichi Sakurahara, R. Sakamoto, Yukako Uchise, T. Wada, Kenzo Nagatomo","doi":"10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00041.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Relationship between outcomes of major hepatectomy and the mortality rate predicted by National Clinical Database risk calculator (NCD-RC) was examined . Methods: Patient demographics and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates among 55 patients who underwent major hepatectomies . The cut-off value for high-risk mortality was set at 5%. Patients were divided into four groups: A) no severe complications and low predictive mortality rate (woML) , B) severe complications or mortality, and low mortality rate (wML) , C) no severe complications and high mortality rate (woMH) , and D) severe complications or mortality, and high mortality rate (wMH) . Results: Morbidity higher than CD III occurred in 17 patients (28%) and 30-day and in-hospital mortality in none and two (3%), respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher for male patients (p<0.01). Age, elderly patients, diseases, and co-morbidity did not significantly differ among groups. Although bile leakage was common in group wML , there were no in-hospital deaths. All surgical procedures performed in group wMH were right hepatectomy with bile duct resection (RH-BDR) for biliary malignancy, and two died of hepatic failure; however, the incidence of RH-BDR was not significantly higher than those in other groups. Conclusions: Preoperative mortality rate predicted by NCD-RC was not always consistent with outcomes in actual clinical settings and further improvements are needed. In case of RH-BDR for biliary malignancy with high predictive mortality rate, careful decision making for liver function and perioperative management are required.","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional actual utilization of postoperative mortality using nationwide survey based risk calculator in patients who underwent major hepatectomy\",\"authors\":\"A. Nanashima, N. Imamura, M. Hiyoshi, K. Yano, T. Hamada, T. Nishida, Daichi Sakurahara, R. Sakamoto, Yukako Uchise, T. Wada, Kenzo Nagatomo\",\"doi\":\"10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00041.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Relationship between outcomes of major hepatectomy and the mortality rate predicted by National Clinical Database risk calculator (NCD-RC) was examined . Methods: Patient demographics and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates among 55 patients who underwent major hepatectomies . The cut-off value for high-risk mortality was set at 5%. Patients were divided into four groups: A) no severe complications and low predictive mortality rate (woML) , B) severe complications or mortality, and low mortality rate (wML) , C) no severe complications and high mortality rate (woMH) , and D) severe complications or mortality, and high mortality rate (wMH) . Results: Morbidity higher than CD III occurred in 17 patients (28%) and 30-day and in-hospital mortality in none and two (3%), respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher for male patients (p<0.01). Age, elderly patients, diseases, and co-morbidity did not significantly differ among groups. Although bile leakage was common in group wML , there were no in-hospital deaths. All surgical procedures performed in group wMH were right hepatectomy with bile duct resection (RH-BDR) for biliary malignancy, and two died of hepatic failure; however, the incidence of RH-BDR was not significantly higher than those in other groups. Conclusions: Preoperative mortality rate predicted by NCD-RC was not always consistent with outcomes in actual clinical settings and further improvements are needed. In case of RH-BDR for biliary malignancy with high predictive mortality rate, careful decision making for liver function and perioperative management are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00041.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-20-00041.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过国家临床数据库风险计算器(NCD-RC)预测的死亡率与主要肝切除术的结果之间的关系进行了研究。方法:在55例接受大肝切除术的患者中,比较30天和住院死亡率的患者人口统计数据以及术后发病率和死亡率。高危死亡率的临界值设定为5%。患者被分为四组:A)无严重并发症和低预测死亡率(woML),B)严重并发症或死亡率和低死亡率(wML),C)无严重合并症和高死亡率(woMH),D)严重合并症或死亡率和高死亡率。结果:17例患者的发病率高于CD III(28%),30天和住院死亡率分别为0例和2例(3%)。男性患者的住院死亡率显著较高(p<0.01)。年龄、老年患者、疾病和合并发病率在各组之间没有显著差异。尽管胆漏在wML组中很常见,但没有住院死亡病例。wMH组所有手术均为右肝切除加胆管切除术(RH-BDR)治疗胆道恶性肿瘤,其中2例死于肝功能衰竭;但RH-BDR的发生率并不显著高于其他组。结论:NCD-RC预测的术前死亡率并不总是与实际临床环境中的结果一致,需要进一步改进。对于预测死亡率高的胆道恶性肿瘤的RH-BDR,需要对肝功能和围手术期管理进行仔细的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional actual utilization of postoperative mortality using nationwide survey based risk calculator in patients who underwent major hepatectomy
Background: Relationship between outcomes of major hepatectomy and the mortality rate predicted by National Clinical Database risk calculator (NCD-RC) was examined . Methods: Patient demographics and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates among 55 patients who underwent major hepatectomies . The cut-off value for high-risk mortality was set at 5%. Patients were divided into four groups: A) no severe complications and low predictive mortality rate (woML) , B) severe complications or mortality, and low mortality rate (wML) , C) no severe complications and high mortality rate (woMH) , and D) severe complications or mortality, and high mortality rate (wMH) . Results: Morbidity higher than CD III occurred in 17 patients (28%) and 30-day and in-hospital mortality in none and two (3%), respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher for male patients (p<0.01). Age, elderly patients, diseases, and co-morbidity did not significantly differ among groups. Although bile leakage was common in group wML , there were no in-hospital deaths. All surgical procedures performed in group wMH were right hepatectomy with bile duct resection (RH-BDR) for biliary malignancy, and two died of hepatic failure; however, the incidence of RH-BDR was not significantly higher than those in other groups. Conclusions: Preoperative mortality rate predicted by NCD-RC was not always consistent with outcomes in actual clinical settings and further improvements are needed. In case of RH-BDR for biliary malignancy with high predictive mortality rate, careful decision making for liver function and perioperative management are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International surgery
International surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field. The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include: -worldwide internet transmission -prompt peer reviews -timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts -even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published. Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Pulmonary Herniation: A Conservative Approach Considerations for Iliac Vein Repair in the Setting of Urologic Procedures Abscess formation of abdominal wall mimicking lymphoma due to Morganella morganii infection in a prepubescent children Application of Kegel Motion Combined with Warming Acupuncture at the Eight Acupuncture Points in Patients with Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy A 270° Retention of Spinal Structure in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis via Posterior-Only Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1