{"title":"三种心理社会量表的印刷和电子应用的心理测量等效性","authors":"Nazira Calleja, Julieta Beatriz Candelario Mosco, Jorge Humberto Rosas Medina, Erika Souza Colín","doi":"10.32348/1852.4206.V12.N2.25284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl proposito del estudio fue examinar el efecto del formato de aplicacion (impreso versus electronico) de escalas psicosociales sobre sus propiedades psicometricas y las mediciones obtenidas. Estudiantes universitarios (N = 435) respondieron tres escalas breves y unidimensionales, que evaluaban optimismo, gratitud y bienestar subjetivo, en formato impreso (52%) o electronico (48%). Se encontro que las medias de los puntajes de las tres escalas no difirieron significativamente al comparar ambos medios de aplicacion. En general, tanto los instrumentos electronicos como los de papel aportaron resultados con propiedades similares de confiabilidad y validez. Al analizar la invarianza de medicion, comparando el modelo sin restricciones en la estructura factorial con los distintos modelos con invarianza, se comprobo que las medidas eran equivalentes en ambos formatos. Se concluyo que el medio de aplicacion no afecta los indices obtenidos, por lo que podrian emplearse indistintamente. EnglishThe purpose of the study was to examine the influence of the format of administration (printed versus electronic) of psychosocial scales on their psychometric properties and the measurements obtained. University students (N = 435) completed three short and one-dimensional scales, which evaluated optimism, gratitude, and subjective well-being, in printed (52%) or electronic (48%) format. It was found that the mean scores of the three scales did not differ significantly when comparing both modes of application; overall, both electronic and paper instruments provided results with similar properties of reliability and validity. When analyzing the measurement invariance, comparing the model without constraints in the factor structure with the different models with invariance, the measures were equivalent in printed and electronic formats. It was concluded that the format of administration does not affect the indices obtained, so they could be used interchangeably.","PeriodicalId":53986,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","volume":"12 1","pages":"50-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equivalencia psicométrica de las aplicaciones impresas y electrónicas de tres escalas psicosociales\",\"authors\":\"Nazira Calleja, Julieta Beatriz Candelario Mosco, Jorge Humberto Rosas Medina, Erika Souza Colín\",\"doi\":\"10.32348/1852.4206.V12.N2.25284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEl proposito del estudio fue examinar el efecto del formato de aplicacion (impreso versus electronico) de escalas psicosociales sobre sus propiedades psicometricas y las mediciones obtenidas. Estudiantes universitarios (N = 435) respondieron tres escalas breves y unidimensionales, que evaluaban optimismo, gratitud y bienestar subjetivo, en formato impreso (52%) o electronico (48%). Se encontro que las medias de los puntajes de las tres escalas no difirieron significativamente al comparar ambos medios de aplicacion. En general, tanto los instrumentos electronicos como los de papel aportaron resultados con propiedades similares de confiabilidad y validez. Al analizar la invarianza de medicion, comparando el modelo sin restricciones en la estructura factorial con los distintos modelos con invarianza, se comprobo que las medidas eran equivalentes en ambos formatos. Se concluyo que el medio de aplicacion no afecta los indices obtenidos, por lo que podrian emplearse indistintamente. EnglishThe purpose of the study was to examine the influence of the format of administration (printed versus electronic) of psychosocial scales on their psychometric properties and the measurements obtained. University students (N = 435) completed three short and one-dimensional scales, which evaluated optimism, gratitude, and subjective well-being, in printed (52%) or electronic (48%) format. It was found that the mean scores of the three scales did not differ significantly when comparing both modes of application; overall, both electronic and paper instruments provided results with similar properties of reliability and validity. When analyzing the measurement invariance, comparing the model without constraints in the factor structure with the different models with invariance, the measures were equivalent in printed and electronic formats. It was concluded that the format of administration does not affect the indices obtained, so they could be used interchangeably.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"50-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.V12.N2.25284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.V12.N2.25284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Equivalencia psicométrica de las aplicaciones impresas y electrónicas de tres escalas psicosociales
espanolEl proposito del estudio fue examinar el efecto del formato de aplicacion (impreso versus electronico) de escalas psicosociales sobre sus propiedades psicometricas y las mediciones obtenidas. Estudiantes universitarios (N = 435) respondieron tres escalas breves y unidimensionales, que evaluaban optimismo, gratitud y bienestar subjetivo, en formato impreso (52%) o electronico (48%). Se encontro que las medias de los puntajes de las tres escalas no difirieron significativamente al comparar ambos medios de aplicacion. En general, tanto los instrumentos electronicos como los de papel aportaron resultados con propiedades similares de confiabilidad y validez. Al analizar la invarianza de medicion, comparando el modelo sin restricciones en la estructura factorial con los distintos modelos con invarianza, se comprobo que las medidas eran equivalentes en ambos formatos. Se concluyo que el medio de aplicacion no afecta los indices obtenidos, por lo que podrian emplearse indistintamente. EnglishThe purpose of the study was to examine the influence of the format of administration (printed versus electronic) of psychosocial scales on their psychometric properties and the measurements obtained. University students (N = 435) completed three short and one-dimensional scales, which evaluated optimism, gratitude, and subjective well-being, in printed (52%) or electronic (48%) format. It was found that the mean scores of the three scales did not differ significantly when comparing both modes of application; overall, both electronic and paper instruments provided results with similar properties of reliability and validity. When analyzing the measurement invariance, comparing the model without constraints in the factor structure with the different models with invariance, the measures were equivalent in printed and electronic formats. It was concluded that the format of administration does not affect the indices obtained, so they could be used interchangeably.