我们想要什么?20世纪80年代澳大利亚核裁军运动内部的争论

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Labour History Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0145
J. Strauss
{"title":"我们想要什么?20世纪80年代澳大利亚核裁军运动内部的争论","authors":"J. Strauss","doi":"10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1980s, a large, diverse and vibrant nuclear disarmament movement rose again in Australia. This article uses findings from archival research and interviews conducted by the author over a number of years to show that strategy in the movement was contested and the movement's debates and internal development had a substantial impact on its rise and decline. The views of movement activists about how to campaign for its demands, in particular, for the closure of nuclear war-fighting bases in the country, differed greatly. The appearance of the Nuclear Disarmament Party highlighted divergent views that had arisen in the movement about how to relate to the Australian Labor Party. A potential for alternative political and social leadership underlay the insurgent movement's debates and differences.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":"1 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Did We Want? Debates within the Australian Nuclear Disarmament Movement in the 1980s\",\"authors\":\"J. Strauss\",\"doi\":\"10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 1980s, a large, diverse and vibrant nuclear disarmament movement rose again in Australia. This article uses findings from archival research and interviews conducted by the author over a number of years to show that strategy in the movement was contested and the movement's debates and internal development had a substantial impact on its rise and decline. The views of movement activists about how to campaign for its demands, in particular, for the closure of nuclear war-fighting bases in the country, differed greatly. The appearance of the Nuclear Disarmament Party highlighted divergent views that had arisen in the movement about how to relate to the Australian Labor Party. A potential for alternative political and social leadership underlay the insurgent movement's debates and differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

20世纪80年代,澳大利亚再次兴起了一场大规模、多样化和充满活力的核裁军运动。本文利用作者多年来进行的档案研究和采访的结果表明,运动中的战略存在争议,运动的辩论和内部发展对其兴衰产生了重大影响。运动活动家们对如何争取其要求,特别是关闭该国核战争基地的要求的看法大相径庭。核裁军党的出现凸显了该运动中出现的关于如何与澳大利亚工党建立联系的不同意见。反叛运动的辩论和分歧背后隐藏着替代政治和社会领导的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Did We Want? Debates within the Australian Nuclear Disarmament Movement in the 1980s
In the 1980s, a large, diverse and vibrant nuclear disarmament movement rose again in Australia. This article uses findings from archival research and interviews conducted by the author over a number of years to show that strategy in the movement was contested and the movement's debates and internal development had a substantial impact on its rise and decline. The views of movement activists about how to campaign for its demands, in particular, for the closure of nuclear war-fighting bases in the country, differed greatly. The appearance of the Nuclear Disarmament Party highlighted divergent views that had arisen in the movement about how to relate to the Australian Labor Party. A potential for alternative political and social leadership underlay the insurgent movement's debates and differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The Fragility of Governmentality and Domination: The State, Carceral Labour and “(In)docile Resistance” in the Late Ottoman Empire “At Work, in Hospital, or in Gaol”: Women in British Guiana’s Jails, 1838–1917 Peter John Love (1947–2023) The Unreliable Witness: Clarence Dakin, ASIO, and Espionage British Colonialism and Prison Labour in Inter-War Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1