{"title":"风险调整贴现率和风险非常规项目的现值","authors":"Anastasia Blaset Kastro, N. Kulakov","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An appropriate risk adjustment technique applied to discount rate for evaluating stochastic negative cash flows is discussed. The proposed approach considers a future cash flow as a response to an investment or a borrowing rather than an independent cash flow. As discount rates applied to evaluate investments and borrowings have different meanings, the generalized net present value method is more appropriate to value cash flows with opposite signs. The given method uses two different rates: the finance rate is applied to discount positive present values (PVs) and the reinvestment rate – to discount negative PVs of a nonconventional project. It is shown that these rates are adjusted for risk relatively to their risk-free values in an opposite way. A universal relationship between risk penalty and risk premium is derived from the assumption that investment and borrowing risks are equal in their value.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"66 1","pages":"71 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-adjusted discount rates and the present value of risky nonconventional projects\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Blaset Kastro, N. Kulakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract An appropriate risk adjustment technique applied to discount rate for evaluating stochastic negative cash flows is discussed. The proposed approach considers a future cash flow as a response to an investment or a borrowing rather than an independent cash flow. As discount rates applied to evaluate investments and borrowings have different meanings, the generalized net present value method is more appropriate to value cash flows with opposite signs. The given method uses two different rates: the finance rate is applied to discount positive present values (PVs) and the reinvestment rate – to discount negative PVs of a nonconventional project. It is shown that these rates are adjusted for risk relatively to their risk-free values in an opposite way. A universal relationship between risk penalty and risk premium is derived from the assumption that investment and borrowing risks are equal in their value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1815918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk-adjusted discount rates and the present value of risky nonconventional projects
Abstract An appropriate risk adjustment technique applied to discount rate for evaluating stochastic negative cash flows is discussed. The proposed approach considers a future cash flow as a response to an investment or a borrowing rather than an independent cash flow. As discount rates applied to evaluate investments and borrowings have different meanings, the generalized net present value method is more appropriate to value cash flows with opposite signs. The given method uses two different rates: the finance rate is applied to discount positive present values (PVs) and the reinvestment rate – to discount negative PVs of a nonconventional project. It is shown that these rates are adjusted for risk relatively to their risk-free values in an opposite way. A universal relationship between risk penalty and risk premium is derived from the assumption that investment and borrowing risks are equal in their value.
Engineering EconomistENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment.
The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.