{"title":"帕克斯、新冠肺炎和危机时期紧缩资金对公共服务提供的影响","authors":"Ian Mell","doi":"10.3828/TPR.2020.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown","PeriodicalId":47547,"journal":{"name":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parks, COVID-19 and the impact of austerity funding on public-service provision in a time of crisis\",\"authors\":\"Ian Mell\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/TPR.2020.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown\",\"PeriodicalId\":47547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/TPR.2020.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/TPR.2020.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parks, COVID-19 and the impact of austerity funding on public-service provision in a time of crisis
Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown
期刊介绍:
Town Planning Review has been one of the world"s leading journals of urban and regional planning since its foundation in 1910. With an extensive international readership, TPR is a well established urban and regional planning journal, providing a principal forum for communication between researchers and students, policy analysts and practitioners. To mark TPR’s centenary in 2010, it is proposed to publish a series of ‘Centenary Papers’ -- review papers that record and reflect on the state of the art in a range of topics in the general field of town and regional planning.