帕克斯、新冠肺炎和危机时期紧缩资金对公共服务提供的影响

IF 1.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES TOWN PLANNING REVIEW Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.3828/TPR.2020.51
Ian Mell
{"title":"帕克斯、新冠肺炎和危机时期紧缩资金对公共服务提供的影响","authors":"Ian Mell","doi":"10.3828/TPR.2020.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown","PeriodicalId":47547,"journal":{"name":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parks, COVID-19 and the impact of austerity funding on public-service provision in a time of crisis\",\"authors\":\"Ian Mell\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/TPR.2020.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown\",\"PeriodicalId\":47547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/TPR.2020.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/TPR.2020.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自2010年以来,英国地方政府的资金被大幅削减,首先是在保守党-自由民主党联合政府时期,随后是历届保守党政府,其影响是地方卫生、教育和环境服务资金的大幅缩减。财政削减对地方规划当局(LPA)的限制已经在英国(和国际上)凸显出来。随着行动限制的实施,尽管这些限制在2020年5月开始放松,但可供人们使用的为数不多的资源之一是公园和绿地。由于2019冠状病毒病,公园在物理上和概念上都成为了保护区和有争议的空间,因为公众、地方政府和中央政府一直在争夺对景观的“权利”。所有这些都是在公共部门收缩时期关于紧缩政府和管理的持续辩论中提出的。在这里,梅尔反思了一系列影响英国公园资金和管理的因素,将资金从福利国家转移的政治决策,以及个人和社区对COVID-19封锁对他们施加的限制的反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parks, COVID-19 and the impact of austerity funding on public-service provision in a time of crisis
Since 2010 funding for local government in the UK has been drastically cut, first under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition and subsequently by successive Conservative governments The impact of this has been a drastic downscaling of funding of local health, education and environmental services The limitations placed upon local planning authorities (LPA) by fiscal cuts has been brought to the fore in the UK (and internationally), by the novel coronavirus--COVID-19--and the subsequent 'stay-at-home' orders issues by the UK government With restrictions of movement in place, although these are beginning to be relaxed in May 2020, among the few resources available to people are public parks and green spaces As a result of COVID-19, parks have become both sanctuaries and contentious spaces, physically and conceptually, as the public, LPAs and central government have fought over perceived 'rights' to the landscape, and what practices should be allowed in them All of which has been framed within an ongoing debate of austerity government and the management in a time of public-sector contraction Here, Mell reflects on a series of factors that have influenced the funding and management of parks in the UK, the political decision making that has shifted funding away from the welfare state, and the reactions of individuals and communities to the restrictions placed upon them by the COVID-19 lockdown
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Town Planning Review has been one of the world"s leading journals of urban and regional planning since its foundation in 1910. With an extensive international readership, TPR is a well established urban and regional planning journal, providing a principal forum for communication between researchers and students, policy analysts and practitioners. To mark TPR’s centenary in 2010, it is proposed to publish a series of ‘Centenary Papers’ -- review papers that record and reflect on the state of the art in a range of topics in the general field of town and regional planning.
期刊最新文献
Mind the widening ‘theory–practice gap’? The retreat to positivism in planning practice International academic conference: Urban and Rural Research in Peru and Latin America, I CIUR 2022: advances, challenges and prospects Does tourism chase the living culture? Singapore’s Kampong Glam and Geylang Serai 55th Universities’ Transport Study Group (UTSG) Annual Conference, Cardiff, UK, 10–12 July 2023 Index to Volume 94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1