考察ETF盘中流动性:投资者何时应该交易?

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2019-03-31 DOI:10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006
James J. Rowley, Charles J. Thomas, Ryan E. O’Hanlon
{"title":"考察ETF盘中流动性:投资者何时应该交易?","authors":"James J. Rowley, Charles J. Thomas, Ryan E. O’Hanlon","doi":"10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors analyze the effect of time of day on the average bid/ask spread of an exchange-traded fund (ETF). They examine a cross-section of 55,781 intraday spread observations generated by 744 US-domiciled ETFs in 2017, controlling for fund category, trading volume, and issuer. The authors find that, both before and after they add controls, average spreads are highest in the early morning, supporting the argument that investors should avoid trading near market open. Before controls, average spreads are tightest in the late afternoon. After controls, they appear elevated during the final five minutes. However, because volume increases substantially during that period, spreads still appear tighter overall. Therefore, our analysis does not support the argument that investors should avoid trading near market close. Unexpectedly, after controls, the authors find higher spreads during Federal Open Market Committee announcements. This suggests that investors should be vigilant when trading at such times.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Intraday ETF Liquidity: When Should Investors Trade?\",\"authors\":\"James J. Rowley, Charles J. Thomas, Ryan E. O’Hanlon\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the authors analyze the effect of time of day on the average bid/ask spread of an exchange-traded fund (ETF). They examine a cross-section of 55,781 intraday spread observations generated by 744 US-domiciled ETFs in 2017, controlling for fund category, trading volume, and issuer. The authors find that, both before and after they add controls, average spreads are highest in the early morning, supporting the argument that investors should avoid trading near market open. Before controls, average spreads are tightest in the late afternoon. After controls, they appear elevated during the final five minutes. However, because volume increases substantially during that period, spreads still appear tighter overall. Therefore, our analysis does not support the argument that investors should avoid trading near market close. Unexpectedly, after controls, the authors find higher spreads during Federal Open Market Committee announcements. This suggests that investors should be vigilant when trading at such times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,作者分析了一天中的时间对交易所交易基金(ETF)的平均买卖价差的影响。他们研究了744只在美国注册的etf在2017年产生的55,781个日内价差观察的横截面,控制了基金类别、交易量和发行人。作者发现,无论是在增加控制措施之前还是之后,平均价差在清晨都是最高的,这支持了投资者应该避免在市场开盘前交易的观点。在实行管制之前,平均价差在下午晚些时候最窄。在控制之后,它们在最后五分钟内显得升高了。然而,由于交易量在此期间大幅增加,利差总体上仍显得更紧。因此,我们的分析并不支持投资者应该避免在市场收盘时交易的观点。出乎意料的是,在管制之后,作者发现,在联邦公开市场委员会(fomc)发布公告时,利差会更高。这表明投资者在这种时候进行交易时应该保持警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Intraday ETF Liquidity: When Should Investors Trade?
In this article, the authors analyze the effect of time of day on the average bid/ask spread of an exchange-traded fund (ETF). They examine a cross-section of 55,781 intraday spread observations generated by 744 US-domiciled ETFs in 2017, controlling for fund category, trading volume, and issuer. The authors find that, both before and after they add controls, average spreads are highest in the early morning, supporting the argument that investors should avoid trading near market open. Before controls, average spreads are tightest in the late afternoon. After controls, they appear elevated during the final five minutes. However, because volume increases substantially during that period, spreads still appear tighter overall. Therefore, our analysis does not support the argument that investors should avoid trading near market close. Unexpectedly, after controls, the authors find higher spreads during Federal Open Market Committee announcements. This suggests that investors should be vigilant when trading at such times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1