韩国新型孤儿药的定价和报销政策:重点关注患者的可及性和预算影响

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs Pub Date : 2022-10-08 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2022.2134007
Jong Hyuk Lee, Seung-Lai Yoo
{"title":"韩国新型孤儿药的定价和报销政策:重点关注患者的可及性和预算影响","authors":"Jong Hyuk Lee, Seung-Lai Yoo","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2022.2134007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background This study aims to analyze the policy and its effects as they apply to new orphan drug (OD) and the budget impact after reimbursement listing in South Korean National Health Insurance (NHI). Methods We analyzed 198 new drugs listed by South Korea’s NHI from July 2007 to March 2017. A comparison of the time to listing for ODs and non-orphan drugs (NODs) was conducted via the Mann–Whitney U test. The budget impact of ODs was analyzed by the NHI claim data from the listing date of new drugs until 31 December 2018. Results An analysis of the time shows that the period (median) for NOD (13.2 months) was shorter than for OD (17.4 months) (Mann–Whitney U test: p = 0.018). The annualized budget impact of OD was 4,967,049 US$/year and that of NOD was 7,800,924 US$/year. Additionally, the percentage of oncology orphan drugs in the total pharmaceutical expenditure was 1.1%; as such, the percentage of non-oncology orphan drug was only 0.9%. Conclusions There has been no significant evidence for patient accessibility improvement regarding new ODs. The proportion of ODs in South Korea’s NHI total pharmaceutical expenditure is not high and the proportion of ODs among new drugs is even lower.","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":"10 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing and reimbursement policy for new orphan drugs in South Korea: focused on patient accessibility and budget impact\",\"authors\":\"Jong Hyuk Lee, Seung-Lai Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678707.2022.2134007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background This study aims to analyze the policy and its effects as they apply to new orphan drug (OD) and the budget impact after reimbursement listing in South Korean National Health Insurance (NHI). Methods We analyzed 198 new drugs listed by South Korea’s NHI from July 2007 to March 2017. A comparison of the time to listing for ODs and non-orphan drugs (NODs) was conducted via the Mann–Whitney U test. The budget impact of ODs was analyzed by the NHI claim data from the listing date of new drugs until 31 December 2018. Results An analysis of the time shows that the period (median) for NOD (13.2 months) was shorter than for OD (17.4 months) (Mann–Whitney U test: p = 0.018). The annualized budget impact of OD was 4,967,049 US$/year and that of NOD was 7,800,924 US$/year. Additionally, the percentage of oncology orphan drugs in the total pharmaceutical expenditure was 1.1%; as such, the percentage of non-oncology orphan drug was only 0.9%. Conclusions There has been no significant evidence for patient accessibility improvement regarding new ODs. The proportion of ODs in South Korea’s NHI total pharmaceutical expenditure is not high and the proportion of ODs among new drugs is even lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2022.2134007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2022.2134007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景本研究旨在分析适用于新型孤儿药(OD)的政策及其效果,以及在韩国国民健康保险(NHI)报销后的预算影响。方法对2007年7月至2017年3月韩国国家药品监督管理局上市的198种新药进行分析。通过Mann-Whitney U检验对ODs和非孤儿药(NOD)的上市时间进行了比较。从新药上市之日到2018年12月31日,NHI索赔数据分析了ODs的预算影响。结果对时间的分析表明,NOD的周期(中位数)(13.2个月)比OD的周期(17.4个月)短(Mann-Whitney U检验:p=0.018)。OD的年预算影响为4967049美元/年,NOD为7800924美元/年。此外,肿瘤孤儿药在药品总支出中的比例为1.1%;因此,非肿瘤孤儿药的比例仅为0.9%。结论没有显著证据表明患者对新OD的可及性有所改善。ODs在韩国NHI医药总支出中的比例并不高,ODs在新药中的比例更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pricing and reimbursement policy for new orphan drugs in South Korea: focused on patient accessibility and budget impact
ABSTRACT Background This study aims to analyze the policy and its effects as they apply to new orphan drug (OD) and the budget impact after reimbursement listing in South Korean National Health Insurance (NHI). Methods We analyzed 198 new drugs listed by South Korea’s NHI from July 2007 to March 2017. A comparison of the time to listing for ODs and non-orphan drugs (NODs) was conducted via the Mann–Whitney U test. The budget impact of ODs was analyzed by the NHI claim data from the listing date of new drugs until 31 December 2018. Results An analysis of the time shows that the period (median) for NOD (13.2 months) was shorter than for OD (17.4 months) (Mann–Whitney U test: p = 0.018). The annualized budget impact of OD was 4,967,049 US$/year and that of NOD was 7,800,924 US$/year. Additionally, the percentage of oncology orphan drugs in the total pharmaceutical expenditure was 1.1%; as such, the percentage of non-oncology orphan drug was only 0.9%. Conclusions There has been no significant evidence for patient accessibility improvement regarding new ODs. The proportion of ODs in South Korea’s NHI total pharmaceutical expenditure is not high and the proportion of ODs among new drugs is even lower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of R&D on rare diseases and orphan drugs.
期刊最新文献
Emerging therapies against Naegleria fowleri Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of leishmaniasis The Orphan Drug Act and rare cancers: a retrospective analysis of oncologic orphan drug designations and associated approvals from 1983-2022 Orphan drugs approved in Canada: health technology assessment, price negotiation, and government formulary listing Overview of genetic testing in Prader-willi syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1