血蛋白酶、降钙素原和C反应蛋白在脓毒症患者不同类型病原菌鉴别中的价值比较

Z. Xiaodong, Gong Ping, W. Wenjuan, Kang Jian, Chun-Sheng Li
{"title":"血蛋白酶、降钙素原和C反应蛋白在脓毒症患者不同类型病原菌鉴别中的价值比较","authors":"Z. Xiaodong, Gong Ping, W. Wenjuan, Kang Jian, Chun-Sheng Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the value of presepsin, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients. \n \n \nMethods \nA prospective study was conducted to collect 322 septic patients who met the diagnostic criteria of \"sepsis 3.0\" in the Emergency ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2016 to January 2018. According to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into the positive blood culture group (n=114) and negative blood culture group (n=208). Patients in the positive blood culture group were further divided into four subgroups: Gram-positive coccus (G+), Gram-negative bacilli (G-), mixed bacteria, and fungi groups. Healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=45). The differences in presepsin, PCT and CRP levels were compared among the groups, and the curves of the subjects' working characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn. \n \n \nResults \nPresepsin, PCT, and CRP were significantly increased in the positive blood culture and negative blood culture groups compared with the control group (all P 0.05), but PCT was significantly higher in the G- and mixed bacteria groups than that in the G+ and fungi groups (all P<0.05). Presepsin predicted a positive blood culture with area under ROC curve of 0.680, which was higher than PCT (AUC=0.599). \n \n \nConclusions \nPresepsin is more valuable than PCT in early predicting positive blood culture in septic patients, but only PCT has an ability to differentiate pathogenic bacteria in septic patients with positive blood culture. It suggested that a combination of Presepsin and PCT should be more meaningful in clinical practice. \n \n \nKey words: \nSepsis; Presepsin; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Gram-positive coccus; Gram-negative bacilli; Fungi","PeriodicalId":9981,"journal":{"name":"中华急诊医学杂志","volume":"28 1","pages":"875-879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the value of blood presepsin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients\",\"authors\":\"Z. Xiaodong, Gong Ping, W. Wenjuan, Kang Jian, Chun-Sheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the value of presepsin, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA prospective study was conducted to collect 322 septic patients who met the diagnostic criteria of \\\"sepsis 3.0\\\" in the Emergency ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2016 to January 2018. According to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into the positive blood culture group (n=114) and negative blood culture group (n=208). Patients in the positive blood culture group were further divided into four subgroups: Gram-positive coccus (G+), Gram-negative bacilli (G-), mixed bacteria, and fungi groups. Healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=45). The differences in presepsin, PCT and CRP levels were compared among the groups, and the curves of the subjects' working characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nPresepsin, PCT, and CRP were significantly increased in the positive blood culture and negative blood culture groups compared with the control group (all P 0.05), but PCT was significantly higher in the G- and mixed bacteria groups than that in the G+ and fungi groups (all P<0.05). Presepsin predicted a positive blood culture with area under ROC curve of 0.680, which was higher than PCT (AUC=0.599). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nPresepsin is more valuable than PCT in early predicting positive blood culture in septic patients, but only PCT has an ability to differentiate pathogenic bacteria in septic patients with positive blood culture. It suggested that a combination of Presepsin and PCT should be more meaningful in clinical practice. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nSepsis; Presepsin; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Gram-positive coccus; Gram-negative bacilli; Fungi\",\"PeriodicalId\":9981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华急诊医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"875-879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华急诊医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华急诊医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较蛋白酶、降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)对脓毒症患者不同类型致病菌的鉴别诊断价值。方法采用前瞻性研究方法,收集2016年7月至2018年1月大连医科大学第一附属医院急诊ICU符合“脓毒症3.0”诊断标准的322例脓毒症患者。根据血培养结果,将患者分为血培养阳性组(n=114)和血培养阴性组(n=208)。血培养阳性组患者进一步分为四个亚组:革兰氏阳性球菌(G+)、革兰氏阴性杆菌(G-)、混合菌和真菌组。选择健康志愿者作为对照组(n=45)。比较各组间蛋白酶、PCT和CRP水平的差异,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线。结果血培养阳性组和血培养阴性组的Presepsin、PCT和CRP均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05),但混合菌组和G-菌组的PCT显著高于真菌组(均P<0.05),结论Presepsin在脓毒症患者血培养阳性的早期预测中比PCT更有价值,但只有PCT具有鉴别血培养阳性脓毒症病人病原菌的能力。这表明Presepsin和PCT的组合在临床实践中应该更有意义。关键词:败血症;Presepsin;降钙素原;C反应蛋白;革兰氏阳性球菌;革兰氏阴性杆菌;真菌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the value of blood presepsin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients
Objective To compare the value of presepsin, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients. Methods A prospective study was conducted to collect 322 septic patients who met the diagnostic criteria of "sepsis 3.0" in the Emergency ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2016 to January 2018. According to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into the positive blood culture group (n=114) and negative blood culture group (n=208). Patients in the positive blood culture group were further divided into four subgroups: Gram-positive coccus (G+), Gram-negative bacilli (G-), mixed bacteria, and fungi groups. Healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=45). The differences in presepsin, PCT and CRP levels were compared among the groups, and the curves of the subjects' working characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn. Results Presepsin, PCT, and CRP were significantly increased in the positive blood culture and negative blood culture groups compared with the control group (all P 0.05), but PCT was significantly higher in the G- and mixed bacteria groups than that in the G+ and fungi groups (all P<0.05). Presepsin predicted a positive blood culture with area under ROC curve of 0.680, which was higher than PCT (AUC=0.599). Conclusions Presepsin is more valuable than PCT in early predicting positive blood culture in septic patients, but only PCT has an ability to differentiate pathogenic bacteria in septic patients with positive blood culture. It suggested that a combination of Presepsin and PCT should be more meaningful in clinical practice. Key words: Sepsis; Presepsin; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Gram-positive coccus; Gram-negative bacilli; Fungi
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华急诊医学杂志
中华急诊医学杂志 Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8629
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine is the only national journal which represents the development of emergency medicine in China. The journal is supervised by China Association of Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association, and co-sponsored by Zhejiang University. The journal publishes original research articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in emergency medicine. The columns include Pre-Hospital Rescue, Emergency Care, Trauma, Resuscitation, Poisoning, Disaster Medicine, Continuing Education, etc. It has a wide coverage in China, and builds up communication with Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and international emergency medicine circles.
期刊最新文献
The value of ROX index in evaluating the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with COVID-19 The prognosis evaluation of sICAM-1, KL-6 combined with EVLWI in severe pneumonia patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Analysis of clinical features of 58 patients with severe or critical 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia Construction of 5G intelligent medical service system in novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control/ 中华急诊医学杂志 Pediatric Airway Foreign Body Retrieval During the Prevention and Control of 2019 Novel Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1