高级别胶质瘤患者护理人员在线干预的探索性多方法评价

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2023-06-20 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npad032
Helen M Haydon, Alethea Blackler, Anna K Nowak, Danette Langbecker, Justin Collier, Georgia Halkett
{"title":"高级别胶质瘤患者护理人员在线干预的探索性多方法评价","authors":"Helen M Haydon, Alethea Blackler, Anna K Nowak, Danette Langbecker, Justin Collier, Georgia Halkett","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate knowledge and skills and a lack of confidence to provide care have been identified as major unmet needs for carers of people with brain cancer. An online intervention was developed to address the unmet needs of carers of people with high-grade glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten carers evaluated the intervention through multiple methods. Acceptability and usability were measured through online data analytics (unique page views, time on page), surveys, and interviews. Questionnaires measured potential impacts on distress (Distress Thermometer), depression, anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), carer competence (Carer Competence Scale), carer preparedness (Caregiving Preparedness Scale), unmet needs (Supportive Care Needs Scale - Brain Tumor Specific for carers), usability and acceptability (USE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggested the intervention had high levels of usability (usability scales' means range = 5.1 to 6.7 out of 7) and acceptability (<i>M</i> = 76.3/100). Correlations indicated the potential to impact depression. Qualitative findings highlighted benefits of the intervention as a comprehensive reliable resource that could validate and normalize carer experiences. Interview findings guided further improvements (eg, additional carer videos, content organization).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicated high acceptability and usability of an online intervention for carers of people with high-grade glioma. This exploratory study also provided preliminary indications of a potential to decrease depression. However, a more robust, potentially longitudinal, investigation is needed with a larger and broader sample. Informed by this study, the intervention has been amended and a randomized controlled trial will further evaluate the enhanced intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory multi-methods evaluation of an online intervention for carers of people with high-grade glioma.\",\"authors\":\"Helen M Haydon, Alethea Blackler, Anna K Nowak, Danette Langbecker, Justin Collier, Georgia Halkett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npad032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate knowledge and skills and a lack of confidence to provide care have been identified as major unmet needs for carers of people with brain cancer. An online intervention was developed to address the unmet needs of carers of people with high-grade glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten carers evaluated the intervention through multiple methods. Acceptability and usability were measured through online data analytics (unique page views, time on page), surveys, and interviews. Questionnaires measured potential impacts on distress (Distress Thermometer), depression, anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), carer competence (Carer Competence Scale), carer preparedness (Caregiving Preparedness Scale), unmet needs (Supportive Care Needs Scale - Brain Tumor Specific for carers), usability and acceptability (USE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggested the intervention had high levels of usability (usability scales' means range = 5.1 to 6.7 out of 7) and acceptability (<i>M</i> = 76.3/100). Correlations indicated the potential to impact depression. Qualitative findings highlighted benefits of the intervention as a comprehensive reliable resource that could validate and normalize carer experiences. Interview findings guided further improvements (eg, additional carer videos, content organization).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicated high acceptability and usability of an online intervention for carers of people with high-grade glioma. This exploratory study also provided preliminary indications of a potential to decrease depression. However, a more robust, potentially longitudinal, investigation is needed with a larger and broader sample. Informed by this study, the intervention has been amended and a randomized controlled trial will further evaluate the enhanced intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识和技能不足以及缺乏提供护理的信心已被确定为癌症患者护理人员未满足的主要需求。开发了一种在线干预措施,以解决高级别神经胶质瘤患者护理人员未满足的需求。10名护理人员通过多种方法对干预措施进行了评估。可接受性和可用性通过在线数据分析(独特的页面浏览量、页面上的时间)、调查和访谈来衡量。问卷测量了对痛苦(痛苦温度计)、抑郁、焦虑(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、护理人员能力(护理人员能力量表)和护理人员准备(护理准备量表)的潜在影响,未满足的需求(支持性护理需求量表-护理人员特有的脑肿瘤)、可用性和可接受性(USE)。结果表明,干预具有较高的可用性(可用性量表的平均值范围为5.1至6.7(满分7))和可接受性(M=76.3/100)。相关性表明,干预可能影响抑郁症。定性研究结果强调了干预作为一种全面可靠的资源的好处,可以验证护理人员的体验并使其正常化。访谈结果指导了进一步的改进(例如,额外的护理人员视频、内容组织)。该研究表明,在线干预对高级胶质瘤患者的护理人员具有很高的可接受性和可用性。这项探索性研究也提供了减少抑郁的潜力的初步迹象。然而,需要对更大、更广泛的样本进行更有力、潜在的纵向调查。根据这项研究,干预措施已经修改,一项随机对照试验将进一步评估强化干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploratory multi-methods evaluation of an online intervention for carers of people with high-grade glioma.

Background: Inadequate knowledge and skills and a lack of confidence to provide care have been identified as major unmet needs for carers of people with brain cancer. An online intervention was developed to address the unmet needs of carers of people with high-grade glioma.

Methods: Ten carers evaluated the intervention through multiple methods. Acceptability and usability were measured through online data analytics (unique page views, time on page), surveys, and interviews. Questionnaires measured potential impacts on distress (Distress Thermometer), depression, anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), carer competence (Carer Competence Scale), carer preparedness (Caregiving Preparedness Scale), unmet needs (Supportive Care Needs Scale - Brain Tumor Specific for carers), usability and acceptability (USE).

Results: Results suggested the intervention had high levels of usability (usability scales' means range = 5.1 to 6.7 out of 7) and acceptability (M = 76.3/100). Correlations indicated the potential to impact depression. Qualitative findings highlighted benefits of the intervention as a comprehensive reliable resource that could validate and normalize carer experiences. Interview findings guided further improvements (eg, additional carer videos, content organization).

Conclusions: The study indicated high acceptability and usability of an online intervention for carers of people with high-grade glioma. This exploratory study also provided preliminary indications of a potential to decrease depression. However, a more robust, potentially longitudinal, investigation is needed with a larger and broader sample. Informed by this study, the intervention has been amended and a randomized controlled trial will further evaluate the enhanced intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
European Association of Neuro-Oncology’s 30th anniversary: A successful and growing relationship with Neuro-Oncology Practice European Association of Neuro-Oncology’s 30th anniversary: A successful and growing relationship with Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical outcomes for pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients Financial Toxicity of Oral Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors Socioeconomic driven disparities in neuro-oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1