在梦的门槛

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Military Ethics Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770
Henrik Syse
{"title":"在梦的门槛","authors":"Henrik Syse","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent editorial of mine carried the title of the Bob Dylan album Time Out of Mind, with reference back to the immortal Shakespearian phrase “time out of joint.” It was a reflection focusing on the challenges and tragedies of a drawn-out, seemingly never-ending pandemic. The reference this time around is probably more obscure to most readers, but just as evocative of our strange times: On the Threshold of a Dream, an adventurous 1969 album by the British band The Moody Blues. The threshold at that time was, most especially, the space age. In our context of the early 2020s, the title evokes the steps we are taking into an ever more thoroughly digitalized world. Artificial intelligence, in the form of increasingly self-learning machines with underlying complex algorithms, is already part of our world. However, most specialists in the field insist that we find ourselves only at the very beginning of what can reasonably be called a dream. Whether it is a sweet and hopeful dream or a downright nightmare is one of the defining questions of our time. During the next decades, the nature of warfare and military defense will be increasingly digital, with conflicts – both in training and in real life – taking place in cyber space just as much as on the kinetic battlefield. More than that, we are facing a world where human soldiers will cooperate ever more closely with, and entrust their lives and missions to, machine agents. The speed and computational power of these machines, alongside their possibility of going well beyond their initial programming, means that even the most fateful of life-anddeath decisions could, for all practical purposes, be made by machines. This may help ensure that law and ethics prevail over irrationality, human failure, and destructive emotions, such as hatred and revenge. But it could equally well lead us to a battlefield where humans have little control over the most dramatic of decisions, and where we end up deferring to authorities that have no human superiors. We are indeed on the threshold, if not of a dream, then at least of a new era, one that will possibly be more different from previous eras than we can currently imagine. As co-editor of this journal, I have no doubt that it is ethics, just as much as – or more than – the technology itself, that will decide whether we are facing nightmarish scenarios or a more hopeful future.","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Threshold of a Dream\",\"authors\":\"Henrik Syse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent editorial of mine carried the title of the Bob Dylan album Time Out of Mind, with reference back to the immortal Shakespearian phrase “time out of joint.” It was a reflection focusing on the challenges and tragedies of a drawn-out, seemingly never-ending pandemic. The reference this time around is probably more obscure to most readers, but just as evocative of our strange times: On the Threshold of a Dream, an adventurous 1969 album by the British band The Moody Blues. The threshold at that time was, most especially, the space age. In our context of the early 2020s, the title evokes the steps we are taking into an ever more thoroughly digitalized world. Artificial intelligence, in the form of increasingly self-learning machines with underlying complex algorithms, is already part of our world. However, most specialists in the field insist that we find ourselves only at the very beginning of what can reasonably be called a dream. Whether it is a sweet and hopeful dream or a downright nightmare is one of the defining questions of our time. During the next decades, the nature of warfare and military defense will be increasingly digital, with conflicts – both in training and in real life – taking place in cyber space just as much as on the kinetic battlefield. More than that, we are facing a world where human soldiers will cooperate ever more closely with, and entrust their lives and missions to, machine agents. The speed and computational power of these machines, alongside their possibility of going well beyond their initial programming, means that even the most fateful of life-anddeath decisions could, for all practical purposes, be made by machines. This may help ensure that law and ethics prevail over irrationality, human failure, and destructive emotions, such as hatred and revenge. But it could equally well lead us to a battlefield where humans have little control over the most dramatic of decisions, and where we end up deferring to authorities that have no human superiors. We are indeed on the threshold, if not of a dream, then at least of a new era, one that will possibly be more different from previous eras than we can currently imagine. As co-editor of this journal, I have no doubt that it is ethics, just as much as – or more than – the technology itself, that will decide whether we are facing nightmarish scenarios or a more hopeful future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Military Ethics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Military Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2021.1950770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我最近的一篇社论以鲍勃·迪伦(Bob Dylan)的专辑《Time Out of Mind》为标题,引用了莎士比亚不朽的短语“Time Out of joint”。它反映了对一场旷日持久、看似永无止境的大流行病所带来的挑战和悲剧的关注。对大多数读者来说,这一次的参考可能更晦涩,但同样唤起了我们这个奇怪的时代:在梦想的门槛上,1969年英国乐队Moody Blues的一张冒险专辑。那个时代的开端,尤其是太空时代。在本世纪20年代初的背景下,这个标题唤起了我们正在迈向一个更加彻底的数字化世界的步伐。人工智能,以越来越多具有复杂算法的自我学习机器的形式,已经成为我们世界的一部分。然而,该领域的大多数专家坚持认为,我们发现自己只是在可以合理地称为梦的最开始。这是一个甜蜜而充满希望的梦,还是一个彻头彻尾的噩梦,这是我们这个时代的决定性问题之一。在接下来的几十年里,战争和军事防御的性质将越来越数字化,无论是训练还是现实生活中的冲突,都将在网络空间发生,就像在动态战场上一样。不仅如此,我们正面临着这样一个世界:人类士兵将与机器特工更加密切地合作,并将他们的生命和任务托付给机器特工。这些机器的速度和计算能力,以及它们远远超出其初始编程的可能性,意味着即使是最重要的生死决定,出于所有实际目的,也可以由机器做出。这可能有助于确保法律和道德战胜非理性、人类的失败以及仇恨和报复等破坏性情绪。但它同样可能把我们带入一个战场,在那里,人类对最戏剧性的决定几乎没有控制权,我们最终会服从没有人类上级的权威。我们确实站在一个新时代的门槛上,如果不是梦想,那么至少是一个新时代的门槛,一个可能比我们目前所能想象的更不同于以往时代的时代。作为本刊的联合编辑,我毫不怀疑,决定我们面临的是噩梦般的场景还是更有希望的未来的,是伦理道德,就像——甚至比——技术本身更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Threshold of a Dream
A recent editorial of mine carried the title of the Bob Dylan album Time Out of Mind, with reference back to the immortal Shakespearian phrase “time out of joint.” It was a reflection focusing on the challenges and tragedies of a drawn-out, seemingly never-ending pandemic. The reference this time around is probably more obscure to most readers, but just as evocative of our strange times: On the Threshold of a Dream, an adventurous 1969 album by the British band The Moody Blues. The threshold at that time was, most especially, the space age. In our context of the early 2020s, the title evokes the steps we are taking into an ever more thoroughly digitalized world. Artificial intelligence, in the form of increasingly self-learning machines with underlying complex algorithms, is already part of our world. However, most specialists in the field insist that we find ourselves only at the very beginning of what can reasonably be called a dream. Whether it is a sweet and hopeful dream or a downright nightmare is one of the defining questions of our time. During the next decades, the nature of warfare and military defense will be increasingly digital, with conflicts – both in training and in real life – taking place in cyber space just as much as on the kinetic battlefield. More than that, we are facing a world where human soldiers will cooperate ever more closely with, and entrust their lives and missions to, machine agents. The speed and computational power of these machines, alongside their possibility of going well beyond their initial programming, means that even the most fateful of life-anddeath decisions could, for all practical purposes, be made by machines. This may help ensure that law and ethics prevail over irrationality, human failure, and destructive emotions, such as hatred and revenge. But it could equally well lead us to a battlefield where humans have little control over the most dramatic of decisions, and where we end up deferring to authorities that have no human superiors. We are indeed on the threshold, if not of a dream, then at least of a new era, one that will possibly be more different from previous eras than we can currently imagine. As co-editor of this journal, I have no doubt that it is ethics, just as much as – or more than – the technology itself, that will decide whether we are facing nightmarish scenarios or a more hopeful future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Military Ethics
Journal of Military Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
In Between Digital War and Peace. Does History Matter? The Warfare Ideology of Ordeal: Another Form of Just War Thinking? Theory and Practice from the Early Middle Ages An Ethics of Care Perspective on Care to Battlefield Casualties A Little Lower but Still in the Fight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1