东盟的“新保护主义”

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Asia-Pacific Business Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232
E. Devadason
{"title":"东盟的“新保护主义”","authors":"E. Devadason","doi":"10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 21st century suggests a somewhat vexing scenario of “new protectionism”, especially with the rise of protectionist non-tariff measures or NTMs. This largely refers to standard-like NTMs (sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade, known as SPS and TBTs respectively) with a dual purpose of non-trade policy objectives and (hidden/concealed) protectionism. Since ASEAN is a high user of standard-like NTMs relative to other measures, this begs the question if there is an intentional shift toward murky protectionism in the region. Grounded on a few criterion to establish potential protectionism, the paper forwards the plausibility of “hidden” barriers in the standard-like NTMs drawing upon related secondary data, and specific illustrative cases of harmful and burdensome NTMs in the individual ASEAN countries. From the narrative experiences of ASEAN, it is inferred that procedural obstacles, directly associated with a reported standard-like NTMs, instead of the NTM itself, account for the “hidden” barriers in ASEAN. The paper concludes that irrespective of the motivation for protectionist NTMs, whether unintentional or intentional, procedural obstacles deserve attention in their own right. Regulatory reform for the standard-like NTMs is therefore needed at the national-level of the AMS to get rid of those “hidden” barriers.","PeriodicalId":15043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","volume":"21 1","pages":"57 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“New Protectionism” in ASEAN\",\"authors\":\"E. Devadason\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The 21st century suggests a somewhat vexing scenario of “new protectionism”, especially with the rise of protectionist non-tariff measures or NTMs. This largely refers to standard-like NTMs (sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade, known as SPS and TBTs respectively) with a dual purpose of non-trade policy objectives and (hidden/concealed) protectionism. Since ASEAN is a high user of standard-like NTMs relative to other measures, this begs the question if there is an intentional shift toward murky protectionism in the region. Grounded on a few criterion to establish potential protectionism, the paper forwards the plausibility of “hidden” barriers in the standard-like NTMs drawing upon related secondary data, and specific illustrative cases of harmful and burdensome NTMs in the individual ASEAN countries. From the narrative experiences of ASEAN, it is inferred that procedural obstacles, directly associated with a reported standard-like NTMs, instead of the NTM itself, account for the “hidden” barriers in ASEAN. The paper concludes that irrespective of the motivation for protectionist NTMs, whether unintentional or intentional, procedural obstacles deserve attention in their own right. Regulatory reform for the standard-like NTMs is therefore needed at the national-level of the AMS to get rid of those “hidden” barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2020.1708232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要21世纪出现了“新保护主义”,尤其是保护主义非关税措施(NTM)的兴起。这在很大程度上是指具有非贸易政策目标和(隐藏/隐藏)保护主义双重目的的类似标准的NTMs(卫生与植物检疫措施和技术性贸易壁垒,分别称为SPS和TBT)。由于与其他措施相比,东盟是NTM等标准的高用户,这就引出了一个问题,即该地区是否有意转向模糊的保护主义。基于建立潜在保护主义的几个标准,本文利用相关的二次数据,以及东盟各国有害和繁重的非关税壁垒的具体例证,提出了非关税壁垒等标准中“隐藏”壁垒的合理性。根据东盟的叙述经验,可以推断,与NTM等报告标准直接相关的程序障碍,而不是NTM本身,是东盟“隐藏”障碍的原因。该文件的结论是,无论保护主义非关税壁垒的动机是什么,无论是无意的还是有意的,程序性障碍本身都值得关注。因此,AMS需要在国家层面对NTM等标准进行监管改革,以消除这些“隐藏”的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“New Protectionism” in ASEAN
ABSTRACT The 21st century suggests a somewhat vexing scenario of “new protectionism”, especially with the rise of protectionist non-tariff measures or NTMs. This largely refers to standard-like NTMs (sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade, known as SPS and TBTs respectively) with a dual purpose of non-trade policy objectives and (hidden/concealed) protectionism. Since ASEAN is a high user of standard-like NTMs relative to other measures, this begs the question if there is an intentional shift toward murky protectionism in the region. Grounded on a few criterion to establish potential protectionism, the paper forwards the plausibility of “hidden” barriers in the standard-like NTMs drawing upon related secondary data, and specific illustrative cases of harmful and burdensome NTMs in the individual ASEAN countries. From the narrative experiences of ASEAN, it is inferred that procedural obstacles, directly associated with a reported standard-like NTMs, instead of the NTM itself, account for the “hidden” barriers in ASEAN. The paper concludes that irrespective of the motivation for protectionist NTMs, whether unintentional or intentional, procedural obstacles deserve attention in their own right. Regulatory reform for the standard-like NTMs is therefore needed at the national-level of the AMS to get rid of those “hidden” barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Present circumstances underscore the need to improve the understanding of conducting business with and within the Asia-Pacific countries. The Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™ provides a blend of cutting-edge knowledge and practical applications on business management and marketing strategy. In the Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™, you will find articles and feature sections that provide a pragmatic view of the business environment in this dynamic region. This essential resource offers readers a good blend of descriptive, conceptual, and theoretical articles dealing with current topics.
期刊最新文献
Notice of duplicate publication: Evergrande and Real Estate Value Subjectivity Insta-Influencers’ Endorsement Effect on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: Parallel Mediation Role of Brand Credibility and Brand Attitude From Keynes’ “Animal Spirits” to Human Spirits? Passion as the Missing Link(s) in Entrepreneurial Intentions Will China Replace America in the Gulf Region? Saudi Chinese Relations and Potential Obstacles Impact of Workforce Flexibility on Operating Costs: Empirical Evidence from Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1