对新闻的平台处罚?社交媒体环境如何改变在线信息的可信度

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2022-08-02 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465
A. Agadjanian, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah Kanter, C. Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni, Leonardo Placeres, Morgan Quental, Henry Sanford, Cameron Skaff, Jennifer Wu, Lillian Zhao, B. Nyhan
{"title":"对新闻的平台处罚?社交媒体环境如何改变在线信息的可信度","authors":"A. Agadjanian, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah Kanter, C. Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni, Leonardo Placeres, Morgan Quental, Henry Sanford, Cameron Skaff, Jennifer Wu, Lillian Zhao, B. Nyhan","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Growing concern about dubious information online threatens the credibility of legitimate news. We examine two possible mechanisms for this effect on social media. First, people might view all news on social media as less credible. Second, questionable information elsewhere in a news feed might discredit legitimate news coverage. Findings from a preregistered experiment confirm that people see information on Facebook as less credible than identical information on news websites, though the effect is small, suggesting that observational data overstates this platform penalty. Prior exposure to low (versus high) credibility information on Facebook also reduces engagement with a target article, but not its perceived credibility. However, exploratory analyses show that the effects of prior exposure to low credibility information vary depending on the plausibility of the target article, decreasing the credibility of a less plausible article (a spillover effect) but increasing the credibility of a more plausible one (a contrast effect).","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"20 1","pages":"338 - 348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A platform penalty for news? How social media context can alter information credibility online\",\"authors\":\"A. Agadjanian, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah Kanter, C. Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni, Leonardo Placeres, Morgan Quental, Henry Sanford, Cameron Skaff, Jennifer Wu, Lillian Zhao, B. Nyhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Growing concern about dubious information online threatens the credibility of legitimate news. We examine two possible mechanisms for this effect on social media. First, people might view all news on social media as less credible. Second, questionable information elsewhere in a news feed might discredit legitimate news coverage. Findings from a preregistered experiment confirm that people see information on Facebook as less credible than identical information on news websites, though the effect is small, suggesting that observational data overstates this platform penalty. Prior exposure to low (versus high) credibility information on Facebook also reduces engagement with a target article, but not its perceived credibility. However, exploratory analyses show that the effects of prior exposure to low credibility information vary depending on the plausibility of the target article, decreasing the credibility of a less plausible article (a spillover effect) but increasing the credibility of a more plausible one (a contrast effect).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"338 - 348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2105465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人们对网上可疑信息的日益关注威胁着合法新闻的可信度。我们研究了社交媒体上这种影响的两种可能机制。首先,人们可能会认为社交媒体上的所有新闻都不那么可信。其次,信息流中其他地方的可疑信息可能会使合法的新闻报道失去可信度。一项预先注册的实验结果证实,人们认为Facebook上的信息比新闻网站上的相同信息更不可信,尽管这种影响很小,这表明观察数据夸大了这种平台惩罚。先前在Facebook上接触低可信度(相对于高可信度)的信息也会降低目标文章的参与度,但不会降低其感知可信度。然而,探索性分析表明,先前接触低可信度信息的影响取决于目标文章的可信度,降低了不太可信的文章的可信度(溢出效应),但增加了更可信的文章的可信度(对比效应)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A platform penalty for news? How social media context can alter information credibility online
ABSTRACT Growing concern about dubious information online threatens the credibility of legitimate news. We examine two possible mechanisms for this effect on social media. First, people might view all news on social media as less credible. Second, questionable information elsewhere in a news feed might discredit legitimate news coverage. Findings from a preregistered experiment confirm that people see information on Facebook as less credible than identical information on news websites, though the effect is small, suggesting that observational data overstates this platform penalty. Prior exposure to low (versus high) credibility information on Facebook also reduces engagement with a target article, but not its perceived credibility. However, exploratory analyses show that the effects of prior exposure to low credibility information vary depending on the plausibility of the target article, decreasing the credibility of a less plausible article (a spillover effect) but increasing the credibility of a more plausible one (a contrast effect).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1