Miriam Sved, Ben Latham, Lyndsey Bateman, Libby Buckingham
{"title":"倾听重要的事情:有意义的社区参与作为一种模式的案例研究,为福祉倡议提供信息。","authors":"Miriam Sved, Ben Latham, Lyndsey Bateman, Libby Buckingham","doi":"10.17061/phrp3322316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThis paper contributes to the literature about community engagement processes that effectively support wellbeing approaches in government. Type of program or service: The Victorian Council of Social Service's Voices of Victoria Listening Tour ('the Tour') was a state-wide engagement with communities, and focused on people experiencing disadvantage. Delivered in partnership with Neighbourhood Houses Victoria and other community organisations, it sought to hear from lesser-heard voices about what people need for the foundational conditions of a good life.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe Tour involved facilitated face-to-face sessions in community centres and targeted online sessions with underrepresented cohorts. Essential Media omnibus polling was conducted to test key findings with a wider participant group.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe Tour illuminated a variety of community needs and priorities, many of which overlap with the World Health Organization's social determinants of health. It revealed that people experiencing disadvantage often face problems that do not fall neatly into traditional government departments or portfolios. This shows the value of a whole-of-government wellbeing approach when addressing genuine community need. Structurally, the most productive elements of the community engagement process involved deliberate consideration of the specific conditions that put community members at their ease and empowered them to engage and participate.\n\n\nLESSONS LEARNT\nPeople experiencing disadvantage are rarely directly heard by policy makers. Designing and refining wellbeing approaches in partnership with diverse communities requires methods of engagement that are themselves contributors to community wellbeing. People are overwhelmingly appreciative of being listened to about what matters to them and of being active participants in decision making.","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"33 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing what matters: a case study of meaningful community engagement as a model to inform wellbeing initiatives.\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Sved, Ben Latham, Lyndsey Bateman, Libby Buckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.17061/phrp3322316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nThis paper contributes to the literature about community engagement processes that effectively support wellbeing approaches in government. Type of program or service: The Victorian Council of Social Service's Voices of Victoria Listening Tour ('the Tour') was a state-wide engagement with communities, and focused on people experiencing disadvantage. Delivered in partnership with Neighbourhood Houses Victoria and other community organisations, it sought to hear from lesser-heard voices about what people need for the foundational conditions of a good life.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe Tour involved facilitated face-to-face sessions in community centres and targeted online sessions with underrepresented cohorts. Essential Media omnibus polling was conducted to test key findings with a wider participant group.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe Tour illuminated a variety of community needs and priorities, many of which overlap with the World Health Organization's social determinants of health. It revealed that people experiencing disadvantage often face problems that do not fall neatly into traditional government departments or portfolios. This shows the value of a whole-of-government wellbeing approach when addressing genuine community need. Structurally, the most productive elements of the community engagement process involved deliberate consideration of the specific conditions that put community members at their ease and empowered them to engage and participate.\\n\\n\\nLESSONS LEARNT\\nPeople experiencing disadvantage are rarely directly heard by policy makers. Designing and refining wellbeing approaches in partnership with diverse communities requires methods of engagement that are themselves contributors to community wellbeing. People are overwhelmingly appreciative of being listened to about what matters to them and of being active participants in decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"33 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3322316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3322316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hearing what matters: a case study of meaningful community engagement as a model to inform wellbeing initiatives.
OBJECTIVES
This paper contributes to the literature about community engagement processes that effectively support wellbeing approaches in government. Type of program or service: The Victorian Council of Social Service's Voices of Victoria Listening Tour ('the Tour') was a state-wide engagement with communities, and focused on people experiencing disadvantage. Delivered in partnership with Neighbourhood Houses Victoria and other community organisations, it sought to hear from lesser-heard voices about what people need for the foundational conditions of a good life.
METHODS
The Tour involved facilitated face-to-face sessions in community centres and targeted online sessions with underrepresented cohorts. Essential Media omnibus polling was conducted to test key findings with a wider participant group.
RESULTS
The Tour illuminated a variety of community needs and priorities, many of which overlap with the World Health Organization's social determinants of health. It revealed that people experiencing disadvantage often face problems that do not fall neatly into traditional government departments or portfolios. This shows the value of a whole-of-government wellbeing approach when addressing genuine community need. Structurally, the most productive elements of the community engagement process involved deliberate consideration of the specific conditions that put community members at their ease and empowered them to engage and participate.
LESSONS LEARNT
People experiencing disadvantage are rarely directly heard by policy makers. Designing and refining wellbeing approaches in partnership with diverse communities requires methods of engagement that are themselves contributors to community wellbeing. People are overwhelmingly appreciative of being listened to about what matters to them and of being active participants in decision making.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.