将爱尔兰和欧盟的可持续发展评估与经济理论联系起来

IF 0.2 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Economic and Social Review Pub Date : 2020-06-25 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.309508
Luke McGrath, S. Hynes, J. McHale
{"title":"将爱尔兰和欧盟的可持续发展评估与经济理论联系起来","authors":"Luke McGrath, S. Hynes, J. McHale","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.309508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economists offer what is arguably the most internally consistent framework for sustainable development assessment, the so-called “capital approach”. To operationalise the capital approach, measures of the changes in comprehensive national wealth (Genuine Savings) are required. In this paper, we present estimates of Ireland’s Genuine Savings using the updated public spending code for direction and compare our results with existing estimates in the literature. For practical sustainability assessment, no single indicator is capable of providing an all-encompassing answer, but as we demonstrate, the current monitoring of sustainable development in Ireland and across the EU lacks coherence. We suggest potential paths forward for sustainability policy and assessment that preserve the link with economic theory. We show that regardless of the viewpoint taken on sustainability, the capital approach can provide guidance for a coherent assessment framework.","PeriodicalId":45826,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Social Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"327-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking Sustainable Development Assessment in Ireland and the European Union with Economic Theory\",\"authors\":\"Luke McGrath, S. Hynes, J. McHale\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.309508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economists offer what is arguably the most internally consistent framework for sustainable development assessment, the so-called “capital approach”. To operationalise the capital approach, measures of the changes in comprehensive national wealth (Genuine Savings) are required. In this paper, we present estimates of Ireland’s Genuine Savings using the updated public spending code for direction and compare our results with existing estimates in the literature. For practical sustainability assessment, no single indicator is capable of providing an all-encompassing answer, but as we demonstrate, the current monitoring of sustainable development in Ireland and across the EU lacks coherence. We suggest potential paths forward for sustainability policy and assessment that preserve the link with economic theory. We show that regardless of the viewpoint taken on sustainability, the capital approach can provide guidance for a coherent assessment framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic and Social Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"327-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic and Social Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.309508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.309508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

经济学家为可持续发展评估提供了可能是最具内部一致性的框架,即所谓的“资本方法”。要实施资本方法,需要衡量综合国民财富(真实储蓄)的变化。在本文中,我们使用更新的公共支出代码来估计爱尔兰的真实储蓄,并将我们的结果与文献中的现有估计进行比较。对于实际的可持续性评估,没有一个单一的指标能够提供一个全面的答案,但正如我们所展示的,目前对爱尔兰和整个欧盟可持续发展的监测缺乏一致性。我们提出了可持续性政策和评估的潜在前进路径,以保持与经济理论的联系。我们表明,无论对可持续性采取何种观点,资本方法都可以为连贯的评估框架提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linking Sustainable Development Assessment in Ireland and the European Union with Economic Theory
Economists offer what is arguably the most internally consistent framework for sustainable development assessment, the so-called “capital approach”. To operationalise the capital approach, measures of the changes in comprehensive national wealth (Genuine Savings) are required. In this paper, we present estimates of Ireland’s Genuine Savings using the updated public spending code for direction and compare our results with existing estimates in the literature. For practical sustainability assessment, no single indicator is capable of providing an all-encompassing answer, but as we demonstrate, the current monitoring of sustainable development in Ireland and across the EU lacks coherence. We suggest potential paths forward for sustainability policy and assessment that preserve the link with economic theory. We show that regardless of the viewpoint taken on sustainability, the capital approach can provide guidance for a coherent assessment framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Economic and Social Review is Ireland''s leading journal for economics and applied social science. The Journal is published four times a year. The ESR invites high quality submissions in economics, sociology, and cognate disciplines on topics of relevance to Ireland. Contributions based on original empirical research and employing a comparative international approach are particularly encouraged. The ESR incorporates a policy section that contains applied articles addressing important questions relating to economic and social policy. While these articles do not necessarily have to contain new academic research results, they are subject to the same refereeing process as our academic articles. Suggestions to the Editor for specially themed policy sections are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Linking Sustainable Development Assessment in Ireland and the European Union with Economic Theory Making the Worst of a Bad Situation: A Note on Irexit JOB INSECURITY AND WELL-BEING IN RICH DEMOCRACIES. Taxation, Debt and Relative Prices in the Long Run: The Irish Experience Searching for the Inclusive Growth Tax Grail: The Distributional Impact of Growth Enhancing Tax Reform in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1