《(德)建设城市权专题导论:罗安达与马普托》

Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/19376812.2021.1999830
S. Viegas, S. Jorge
{"title":"《(德)建设城市权专题导论:罗安达与马普托》","authors":"S. Viegas, S. Jorge","doi":"10.1080/19376812.2021.1999830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portuguese-speaking African countries, namely Angola and Mozambique, faced important political-economic and social transformations after their liberations in 1975. Given the geopolitical context of the time, these two countries went through a brief socialist period (1975/1985-90) before opening their economies to national and international markets, in tune with the expansion and consolidation of a fierce global neoliberal matrix currently strengthening, enduring and prevailing. Regarding their development strategies and dynamics, the analysis of these African countries’ infrastructural policies and practices, as reverse to the housing question, is an important tool to amplify the comprehension of their urban realities, particularly of their capital cities, Luanda and Maputo, from the guiding key-notion of the right to the city (Lefebvre, 1968/2009). Following the Lefebvrian perspective (Ibidem), the right to the city aims the access to a better and dignified life, this including broad access to housing, infrastructures and basic urban services, as well as to a more democratic urban management and openness to participation. This guiding concept represents, first of all, the city as work of art (oeuvre), oriented to the appropriation of space and to a collective realization, where all the inhabitants have the same liberty to satisfy their desires and needs, and to conduct the urbanization processes collectively. The infrastructural options concerning both macro-level approaches and ground-based interventions were first of all influenced, conditioned or determined by the legacies of the Portuguese colonial regime and its so-called soft logics of power and domination, but also, more recently, by the massive migration movements heading toward central cities, motivated by civil wars and/or the search for better living conditions. Demographic issues also became important factors for the accelerated growth and urbanization of major cities in these Portuguese-speaking African countries. Given this framework, the (inter)connections between distinct urban contexts were of interest for this special issue, since they pave the path for the ample reading of its suburban realities, reinforcing the importance of infrastructural issues, such as those related to the public administration, its processes and agents, but also its spatial dimensions, particularly road systems, water and energy supply, sewages and urban facilities. These are vital complements to access adequate housing and, in a broader and transformative sense, to help to (de)construct the meaning and pertinence of the right to the city, all the while understanding and giving new significances to the current urban scenario. Most research works included in this special issue were presented in the thematic session that we chaired at the I International Congress Colonial and Post-colonial Landscapes. Architecture, Cities, Infraestructures, held in the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, on 16–19 January 2019, entitled: (De)constructing the Right to the City: Infrastructural policies and practices in Portuguese-","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue on (De)constructing the right to the city: Luanda and Maputo\",\"authors\":\"S. Viegas, S. Jorge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19376812.2021.1999830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portuguese-speaking African countries, namely Angola and Mozambique, faced important political-economic and social transformations after their liberations in 1975. Given the geopolitical context of the time, these two countries went through a brief socialist period (1975/1985-90) before opening their economies to national and international markets, in tune with the expansion and consolidation of a fierce global neoliberal matrix currently strengthening, enduring and prevailing. Regarding their development strategies and dynamics, the analysis of these African countries’ infrastructural policies and practices, as reverse to the housing question, is an important tool to amplify the comprehension of their urban realities, particularly of their capital cities, Luanda and Maputo, from the guiding key-notion of the right to the city (Lefebvre, 1968/2009). Following the Lefebvrian perspective (Ibidem), the right to the city aims the access to a better and dignified life, this including broad access to housing, infrastructures and basic urban services, as well as to a more democratic urban management and openness to participation. This guiding concept represents, first of all, the city as work of art (oeuvre), oriented to the appropriation of space and to a collective realization, where all the inhabitants have the same liberty to satisfy their desires and needs, and to conduct the urbanization processes collectively. The infrastructural options concerning both macro-level approaches and ground-based interventions were first of all influenced, conditioned or determined by the legacies of the Portuguese colonial regime and its so-called soft logics of power and domination, but also, more recently, by the massive migration movements heading toward central cities, motivated by civil wars and/or the search for better living conditions. Demographic issues also became important factors for the accelerated growth and urbanization of major cities in these Portuguese-speaking African countries. Given this framework, the (inter)connections between distinct urban contexts were of interest for this special issue, since they pave the path for the ample reading of its suburban realities, reinforcing the importance of infrastructural issues, such as those related to the public administration, its processes and agents, but also its spatial dimensions, particularly road systems, water and energy supply, sewages and urban facilities. These are vital complements to access adequate housing and, in a broader and transformative sense, to help to (de)construct the meaning and pertinence of the right to the city, all the while understanding and giving new significances to the current urban scenario. Most research works included in this special issue were presented in the thematic session that we chaired at the I International Congress Colonial and Post-colonial Landscapes. Architecture, Cities, Infraestructures, held in the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, on 16–19 January 2019, entitled: (De)constructing the Right to the City: Infrastructural policies and practices in Portuguese-\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2021.1999830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2021.1999830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄牙语非洲国家,即安哥拉和莫桑比克,在1975年解放后面临着重要的政治、经济和社会变革。考虑到当时的地缘政治背景,这两个国家在向国内和国际市场开放经济之前经历了短暂的社会主义时期(1975/1985-90),与目前正在加强、持久和盛行的激烈的全球新自由主义矩阵的扩张和巩固相一致。关于其发展战略和动态,与住房问题相反,对这些非洲国家基础设施政策和做法的分析是一个重要工具,可以从城市权的指导性关键概念出发,扩大对其城市现实的理解,特别是对其首都罗安达和马普托的理解(Lefebvre,1968/2009)。根据列斐布的观点(伊比迪姆),城市权旨在获得更好和有尊严的生活,包括广泛获得住房、基础设施和基本城市服务,以及更民主的城市管理和参与开放。这一指导概念首先代表了城市作为艺术作品(作品),以占用空间和集体实现为导向,在这里,所有居民都有同样的自由来满足他们的欲望和需求,并共同进行城市化进程。涉及宏观层面方法和地面干预的基础设施选择首先受到葡萄牙殖民政权的遗产及其所谓的权力和统治的软逻辑的影响、制约或决定,但最近也受到前往中心城市的大规模移民运动的影响,出于内战和/或寻求更好的生活条件。人口问题也成为这些葡语非洲国家主要城市加速增长和城市化的重要因素。鉴于这一框架,不同城市背景之间的(相互)联系对这一特殊问题很有意义,因为它们为充分解读其郊区现实铺平了道路,加强了基础设施问题的重要性,例如与公共行政、其过程和代理人有关的问题,以及其空间维度,特别是道路系统,供水和能源供应、污水和城市设施。这些是获得适足住房的重要补充,从更广泛和变革的意义上讲,有助于(去)构建城市权的意义和针对性,同时理解当前的城市情景并赋予其新的意义。本特刊中的大多数研究工作都是在我们主持的第一届国际殖民地和后殖民地景观大会的专题会议上介绍的。建筑、城市、基础设施,于2019年1月16日至19日在里斯本的Calouste Gulbenkian基金会举行,题为:(De)建设城市权利:葡萄牙语的基础设施政策和实践-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Introduction to the special issue on (De)constructing the right to the city: Luanda and Maputo
Portuguese-speaking African countries, namely Angola and Mozambique, faced important political-economic and social transformations after their liberations in 1975. Given the geopolitical context of the time, these two countries went through a brief socialist period (1975/1985-90) before opening their economies to national and international markets, in tune with the expansion and consolidation of a fierce global neoliberal matrix currently strengthening, enduring and prevailing. Regarding their development strategies and dynamics, the analysis of these African countries’ infrastructural policies and practices, as reverse to the housing question, is an important tool to amplify the comprehension of their urban realities, particularly of their capital cities, Luanda and Maputo, from the guiding key-notion of the right to the city (Lefebvre, 1968/2009). Following the Lefebvrian perspective (Ibidem), the right to the city aims the access to a better and dignified life, this including broad access to housing, infrastructures and basic urban services, as well as to a more democratic urban management and openness to participation. This guiding concept represents, first of all, the city as work of art (oeuvre), oriented to the appropriation of space and to a collective realization, where all the inhabitants have the same liberty to satisfy their desires and needs, and to conduct the urbanization processes collectively. The infrastructural options concerning both macro-level approaches and ground-based interventions were first of all influenced, conditioned or determined by the legacies of the Portuguese colonial regime and its so-called soft logics of power and domination, but also, more recently, by the massive migration movements heading toward central cities, motivated by civil wars and/or the search for better living conditions. Demographic issues also became important factors for the accelerated growth and urbanization of major cities in these Portuguese-speaking African countries. Given this framework, the (inter)connections between distinct urban contexts were of interest for this special issue, since they pave the path for the ample reading of its suburban realities, reinforcing the importance of infrastructural issues, such as those related to the public administration, its processes and agents, but also its spatial dimensions, particularly road systems, water and energy supply, sewages and urban facilities. These are vital complements to access adequate housing and, in a broader and transformative sense, to help to (de)construct the meaning and pertinence of the right to the city, all the while understanding and giving new significances to the current urban scenario. Most research works included in this special issue were presented in the thematic session that we chaired at the I International Congress Colonial and Post-colonial Landscapes. Architecture, Cities, Infraestructures, held in the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, on 16–19 January 2019, entitled: (De)constructing the Right to the City: Infrastructural policies and practices in Portuguese-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1