急性护理物理治疗中标准化结果测量的感知和应用

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191
Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola
{"title":"急性护理物理治疗中标准化结果测量的感知和应用","authors":"Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception and Utilization of Standardized Outcome Measures in Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Darby Smith, M. Furtado, Gregory Brusola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估急性护理物理治疗师(PTs)的特征与标准化结果测量(OMs)的使用之间的关系;还描述了pt在急性护理环境中使用OMs的感知障碍、促进因素和资源。方法:对过去5年在成人急症护理机构工作或曾经工作过的PTs进行电子调查。分别进行定量和定性分析,然后对结果进行三角测量。结果:方便样本包括227名受访者。大多数受访者(n = 159, 70%)报告使用OMs。有临床专科的患者使用OMs的比例明显高于无临床专科的患者(P = 0.041)。使用OM的频率在经验年限、初级学位和主要患者人群之间没有显著差异。最大的障碍是缺乏时间(60%)。最大的促进因素是来自行政部门的支持(81%)。针对障碍、促进因素和资源产生的主题包括缺乏资源、设置特异性、患者群体和敏锐度、客观数据、设施支持和继续教育。结论:大多数急症护理PTs报告使用OMs,尽管在临床专科患者中观察到更高的频率。本研究提供了提供知识翻译和资源的机会,以克服在急性护理环境中使用OM的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception and Utilization of Standardized Outcome Measures in Acute Care Physical Therapy
Purpose: To assess the relationship between characteristics of acute care physical therapists (PTs) and use of standardized outcome measures (OMs); also describe the perceived barriers, facilitators, and resources to the use of OMs by PTs in the acute care setting. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to PTs who currently work, or have worked, in the adult acute care setting in the past 5 years. Separate quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed followed by triangulation of findings. Results: A convenience sample included 227 respondents. Most respondents (n = 159, 70%) reported using OMs. PTs with a clinical specialty used OMs significantly more (P = .041) than those without. No significant difference was found in the frequency of OM use between years of experience, entry-level degree, and primary patient population. The top barrier was lack of time (60%). The top facilitator was support from administration (81%). Themes generated for barriers, facilitators, and resources included lack of resources, setting specificity, patient population and acuity, objective data, facility support, and continuing education. Conclusions: Most acute care PTs reported using OMs, although a higher frequency was observed in those with a clinical specialty. This study presents opportunities to provide knowledge translation and resources to combat barriers to OM use in the acute care setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Creating Value Together: A Triad of Clinicians, Administrators, and Researchers Overcoming Barriers to Unique Valuation of Acute Care Physical Therapy Where Do We Go From Here? An Editor's Update on the Journal Exploring the Addition of Simulation-Based Learning Experiences to Prepare Student Physical Therapist Assistants for Inpatient Clinical Experience Mobility Checklist for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and a Femoral Intra-aortic Balloon Pump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1