躲避谁?

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intermedialites Pub Date : 2019-04-02 DOI:10.7202/1058473AR
Ksenia Ermoshina, F. Musiani
{"title":"躲避谁?","authors":"Ksenia Ermoshina, F. Musiani","doi":"10.7202/1058473AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following Edward Snowden’s revelations, end-to-end encryption is becoming increasingly widespread in messaging tools—solutions that propose a large variety of ways to conceal, obfuscate, disguise private communications and online activities. Designing privacy-enhancing tools requires the identification of a threat model that serves to agree upon an appropriate threshold of anonymity and confidentiality for a particular context of usage. In this article, we discuss different use-cases, from “nothing-to-hide” low-risk situations to high-risk scenarios in war zones or in authoritarian contexts, to question how users, trainers, and developers co-construct threat models, decide which data to conceal, and how to conceal it. We demonstrate that classic oppositions such as high-risk versus low-risk, privacy versus security, should be redefined within a more relational, processual, and contextual approach.","PeriodicalId":42444,"journal":{"name":"Intermedialites","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7202/1058473AR","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hiding from Whom?\",\"authors\":\"Ksenia Ermoshina, F. Musiani\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1058473AR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following Edward Snowden’s revelations, end-to-end encryption is becoming increasingly widespread in messaging tools—solutions that propose a large variety of ways to conceal, obfuscate, disguise private communications and online activities. Designing privacy-enhancing tools requires the identification of a threat model that serves to agree upon an appropriate threshold of anonymity and confidentiality for a particular context of usage. In this article, we discuss different use-cases, from “nothing-to-hide” low-risk situations to high-risk scenarios in war zones or in authoritarian contexts, to question how users, trainers, and developers co-construct threat models, decide which data to conceal, and how to conceal it. We demonstrate that classic oppositions such as high-risk versus low-risk, privacy versus security, should be redefined within a more relational, processual, and contextual approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intermedialites\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7202/1058473AR\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intermedialites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1058473AR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intermedialites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1058473AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在爱德华·斯诺登(Edward Snowden)的爆料之后,端到端加密在通讯工具中变得越来越普遍——这些解决方案提出了各种各样的方法来隐藏、模糊、伪装私人通信和在线活动。设计隐私增强工具需要识别威胁模型,该模型用于就特定使用上下文的匿名性和机密性的适当阈值达成一致。在本文中,我们讨论了不同的用例,从“没有什么可隐藏的”低风险情况到战区或专制环境中的高风险场景,以询问用户、培训师和开发人员如何共同构建威胁模型,决定隐藏哪些数据,以及如何隐藏它。我们证明,传统的对立,如高风险与低风险,隐私与安全,应该在一个更相关的,过程的,和上下文的方法中重新定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hiding from Whom?
Following Edward Snowden’s revelations, end-to-end encryption is becoming increasingly widespread in messaging tools—solutions that propose a large variety of ways to conceal, obfuscate, disguise private communications and online activities. Designing privacy-enhancing tools requires the identification of a threat model that serves to agree upon an appropriate threshold of anonymity and confidentiality for a particular context of usage. In this article, we discuss different use-cases, from “nothing-to-hide” low-risk situations to high-risk scenarios in war zones or in authoritarian contexts, to question how users, trainers, and developers co-construct threat models, decide which data to conceal, and how to conceal it. We demonstrate that classic oppositions such as high-risk versus low-risk, privacy versus security, should be redefined within a more relational, processual, and contextual approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intermedialites
Intermedialites HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction. The Mediality of Concealment: Material Practices and Symbolic Operativity “Imprisoned Photographs”: The Looted Archive of Photo Rissas (Rassas)—Ibrahim and Chalil (Khalil) Rissas1 Voyage sous « Goyave » : anagrammes et autres clefs d’accès à l’univers romanesque de Yodi Karone Inhabiting the Profile: Zach Blas’ Facial Weaponization Suite Les gueules cassées ou l’éthique de l’écran crevé : du masque au visage cinématographique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1