合作生产能否改变农村公共服务的感知结果?来自中国“社会主义新农村”倡议的证据

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Chinese Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1177/15396754221116714
Liyi Zheng
{"title":"合作生产能否改变农村公共服务的感知结果?来自中国“社会主义新农村”倡议的证据","authors":"Liyi Zheng","doi":"10.1177/15396754221116714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent research on citizen participation in the provision of public services represented by coproduction has become a hot topic in public management. Coproduction studies propose that citizens can directly or indirectly participate in the process of public services to help improve the quality and legitimacy of public services. Very little, however, has been written in the existing coproduction literature on the outcome of public services provision. Based on the “One-Hundred Villages” Survey in 2020, this article analyzes and evaluates the impact of coproduction on the perceived outcome of public service in rural China. A series of statistical analysis results show that both co-planning and co-delivery have significant and positive impacts on how one views the outcome of rural public service provision. This research provides new evidence in rural China that citizen participation plays a crucial role in the state-led “New Socialist Countryside” campaign.","PeriodicalId":41625,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Public Administration Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can coproduction change the perceived outcome of rural public services? Evidence from the “New Socialist Countryside” initiative in China\",\"authors\":\"Liyi Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15396754221116714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent research on citizen participation in the provision of public services represented by coproduction has become a hot topic in public management. Coproduction studies propose that citizens can directly or indirectly participate in the process of public services to help improve the quality and legitimacy of public services. Very little, however, has been written in the existing coproduction literature on the outcome of public services provision. Based on the “One-Hundred Villages” Survey in 2020, this article analyzes and evaluates the impact of coproduction on the perceived outcome of public service in rural China. A series of statistical analysis results show that both co-planning and co-delivery have significant and positive impacts on how one views the outcome of rural public service provision. This research provides new evidence in rural China that citizen participation plays a crucial role in the state-led “New Socialist Countryside” campaign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Public Administration Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Public Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221116714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221116714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,以合作生产为代表的公民参与公共服务的研究已成为公共管理领域的热点。共同生产研究提出,公民可以直接或间接参与公共服务过程,以帮助提高公共服务的质量和合法性。然而,在现有的关于公共服务提供结果的合作文献中,几乎没有写什么。基于2020年“百村”调查,本文分析和评估了合作生产对中国农村公共服务感知结果的影响。一系列统计分析结果表明,共同规划和共同提供对人们如何看待农村公共服务提供的结果都有显著而积极的影响。这项研究为中国农村提供了新的证据,证明公民参与在国家领导的“社会主义新农村”运动中发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can coproduction change the perceived outcome of rural public services? Evidence from the “New Socialist Countryside” initiative in China
The recent research on citizen participation in the provision of public services represented by coproduction has become a hot topic in public management. Coproduction studies propose that citizens can directly or indirectly participate in the process of public services to help improve the quality and legitimacy of public services. Very little, however, has been written in the existing coproduction literature on the outcome of public services provision. Based on the “One-Hundred Villages” Survey in 2020, this article analyzes and evaluates the impact of coproduction on the perceived outcome of public service in rural China. A series of statistical analysis results show that both co-planning and co-delivery have significant and positive impacts on how one views the outcome of rural public service provision. This research provides new evidence in rural China that citizen participation plays a crucial role in the state-led “New Socialist Countryside” campaign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Public Administration Review
Chinese Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The impact of perceived walking environment on social support for older adults Governance capacity, social justice, social security, and institutionalized political participation in China: A moderated mediation model The regional integration transition of China’s immigration policy: The case of Yiwu Targeting performance of Dibao program in China: An empirical study based on the 2020 China Family Panel Studies Book Review: Ying Xiong, Zhexue yu gonggong xingzheng [Philosophy and public administration: An introduction]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1