低剂量纳曲酮治疗纤维肌痛患者疼痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2023-06-15 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001080
Kirsten Bested, Lotte M Jensen, Trine Andresen, Grete Tarp, Louise Skovbjerg, Torben S D Johansen, Anne V Schmedes, Ida K Storgaard, Jonna S Madsen, Mads U Werner, Anette Bendiksen
{"title":"低剂量纳曲酮治疗纤维肌痛患者疼痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究","authors":"Kirsten Bested, Lotte M Jensen, Trine Andresen, Grete Tarp, Louise Skovbjerg, Torben S D Johansen, Anne V Schmedes, Ida K Storgaard, Jonna S Madsen, Mads U Werner, Anette Bendiksen","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic fluctuating, nociplastic pain condition. Naltrexone is a µ-opioid-receptor antagonist; preliminary studies have indicated a pain-relieving effect of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) in patients with FM. The impetus for studying LDN is the assumption of analgesic efficacy and thus reduction of adverse effects seen from conventional pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong><i>First</i>, to examine if LDN is associated with analgesic efficacy compared with control in the treatment of patients with FM. <i>Second</i>, to ascertain the analgesic efficacy of LDN in an experimental pain model in patients with FM evaluating the competence of the descending inhibitory pathways compared with controls. <i>Third,</i> to examine the pharmacokinetics of LDN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design and had a 3-phase setup. The first phase included baseline assessment and a treatment period (days -3 to 21), the second phase a washout period (days 22-32), and the third phase a baseline assessment followed by a treatment period (days 33-56). Treatment was with either LDN 4.5 mg or an inactive placebo given orally once daily. The primary outcomes were Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire revised (FIQR) scores and summed pain intensity ratings (SPIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients with FM were randomized. The median difference (IQR) for FIQR scores between LDN and placebo treatment was -1.65 (18.55; effect size = 0.15; <i>P</i> = 0.3). The median difference for SPIR scores was -0.33 (6.33; effect size = 0.13; <i>P</i> = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcome data did not indicate any clinically relevant analgesic efficacy of the LDN treatment in patients with FM.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"e1080"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-dose naltrexone for treatment of pain in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Bested, Lotte M Jensen, Trine Andresen, Grete Tarp, Louise Skovbjerg, Torben S D Johansen, Anne V Schmedes, Ida K Storgaard, Jonna S Madsen, Mads U Werner, Anette Bendiksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic fluctuating, nociplastic pain condition. Naltrexone is a µ-opioid-receptor antagonist; preliminary studies have indicated a pain-relieving effect of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) in patients with FM. The impetus for studying LDN is the assumption of analgesic efficacy and thus reduction of adverse effects seen from conventional pharmacotherapy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong><i>First</i>, to examine if LDN is associated with analgesic efficacy compared with control in the treatment of patients with FM. <i>Second</i>, to ascertain the analgesic efficacy of LDN in an experimental pain model in patients with FM evaluating the competence of the descending inhibitory pathways compared with controls. <i>Third,</i> to examine the pharmacokinetics of LDN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design and had a 3-phase setup. The first phase included baseline assessment and a treatment period (days -3 to 21), the second phase a washout period (days 22-32), and the third phase a baseline assessment followed by a treatment period (days 33-56). Treatment was with either LDN 4.5 mg or an inactive placebo given orally once daily. The primary outcomes were Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire revised (FIQR) scores and summed pain intensity ratings (SPIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients with FM were randomized. The median difference (IQR) for FIQR scores between LDN and placebo treatment was -1.65 (18.55; effect size = 0.15; <i>P</i> = 0.3). The median difference for SPIR scores was -0.33 (6.33; effect size = 0.13; <i>P</i> = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcome data did not indicate any clinically relevant analgesic efficacy of the LDN treatment in patients with FM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e1080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789452/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。摘要简介:纤维肌痛(FM)是一种慢性波动性、疼痛性疾病。纳曲酮是一种µ-阿片受体拮抗剂;初步研究表明,低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)对FM患者有镇痛作用。研究LDN的动力是假设其镇痛效果,从而减少传统药物治疗的不良反应。目的:首先,在FM患者的治疗中,与对照组相比,检查LDN是否与镇痛效果相关。其次,在FM病人的实验性疼痛模型中,确定LDN的镇痛效果,评估与对照组比较下行抑制途径的能力。第三,检测LDN的药代动力学。方法:本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉设计,分三阶段进行。第一阶段包括基线评估和治疗期(第−3至21天),第二阶段为洗出期(第22-32天),而第三阶段为基线评估,随后为治疗期(33至56天)。治疗采用LDN 4.5 mg或非活性安慰剂,每天口服一次。主要结果是纤维肌痛影响问卷修订(FIQR)评分和疼痛强度总评分(SPIR)。结果:58例FM患者被随机分组。LDN和安慰剂治疗之间FIQR评分的中位差异(IQR)为−1.65(18.55;效应大小=0.15;P=0.03)。SPIR评分的中位数差异为−0.33(6.33;效应大小=0.013;P=0.04)。结论:结果数据未表明LDN治疗对FM患者有任何临床相关的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-dose naltrexone for treatment of pain in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Introduction: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic fluctuating, nociplastic pain condition. Naltrexone is a µ-opioid-receptor antagonist; preliminary studies have indicated a pain-relieving effect of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) in patients with FM. The impetus for studying LDN is the assumption of analgesic efficacy and thus reduction of adverse effects seen from conventional pharmacotherapy.

Objectives: First, to examine if LDN is associated with analgesic efficacy compared with control in the treatment of patients with FM. Second, to ascertain the analgesic efficacy of LDN in an experimental pain model in patients with FM evaluating the competence of the descending inhibitory pathways compared with controls. Third, to examine the pharmacokinetics of LDN.

Methods: The study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design and had a 3-phase setup. The first phase included baseline assessment and a treatment period (days -3 to 21), the second phase a washout period (days 22-32), and the third phase a baseline assessment followed by a treatment period (days 33-56). Treatment was with either LDN 4.5 mg or an inactive placebo given orally once daily. The primary outcomes were Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire revised (FIQR) scores and summed pain intensity ratings (SPIR).

Results: Fifty-eight patients with FM were randomized. The median difference (IQR) for FIQR scores between LDN and placebo treatment was -1.65 (18.55; effect size = 0.15; P = 0.3). The median difference for SPIR scores was -0.33 (6.33; effect size = 0.13; P = 0.4).

Conclusion: Outcome data did not indicate any clinically relevant analgesic efficacy of the LDN treatment in patients with FM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preexisting chronic pain is not associated with moderate-to-severe acute pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Why might fears and worries persist after a pain education-grounded multimodal intervention for chronic back pain? A qualitative study. Pain and small fiber pathology in men with fibromyalgia syndrome. Upregulated spinal histone deacetylases induce nociceptive sensitization by inhibiting the GABA system in chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathy in rats. Integrated manual therapies: IASP taskforce viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1