2020年总统竞选期间的候选人评价和社交媒体关注

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Political Marketing Pub Date : 2022-07-26 DOI:10.1080/15377857.2022.2099585
K. Kenski, Dam Hee Kim, S. M. Jones-Jang
{"title":"2020年总统竞选期间的候选人评价和社交媒体关注","authors":"K. Kenski, Dam Hee Kim, S. M. Jones-Jang","doi":"10.1080/15377857.2022.2099585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between presidential candidate evaluations and following the candidates on five social media (SM) platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube. Analyses of national survey data collected during the 2020 presidential campaign (N = 2,120) suggest that following a candidate on SM is positively associated with feelings toward that candidate, even after gender, age, race, education, party identification, and online news media use have been taken into consideration. Specifically, individuals who followed Trump on Facebook, Twitter, and/or YouTube supported him more than did those who did not follow him. Following Biden on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and/or Snapchat was positively associated with his feeling thermometer ratings after demographic variables, party identification, and online news media use were controlled. Moreover, we show that these positive relationships were more pronounced among those who did not identify with one of the major political parties. Following a candidate, however, was not necessarily associated with decreased support for the opposing candidate. Overall, our results highlight the importance of politicians’ use of social media during campaigns and suggest that following candidates on different SM platforms has unique relationships with candidate evaluations.","PeriodicalId":46259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Marketing","volume":"21 1","pages":"272 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Candidate Evaluations and Social Media Following during the 2020 Presidential Campaign\",\"authors\":\"K. Kenski, Dam Hee Kim, S. M. Jones-Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377857.2022.2099585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between presidential candidate evaluations and following the candidates on five social media (SM) platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube. Analyses of national survey data collected during the 2020 presidential campaign (N = 2,120) suggest that following a candidate on SM is positively associated with feelings toward that candidate, even after gender, age, race, education, party identification, and online news media use have been taken into consideration. Specifically, individuals who followed Trump on Facebook, Twitter, and/or YouTube supported him more than did those who did not follow him. Following Biden on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and/or Snapchat was positively associated with his feeling thermometer ratings after demographic variables, party identification, and online news media use were controlled. Moreover, we show that these positive relationships were more pronounced among those who did not identify with one of the major political parties. Following a candidate, however, was not necessarily associated with decreased support for the opposing candidate. Overall, our results highlight the importance of politicians’ use of social media during campaigns and suggest that following candidates on different SM platforms has unique relationships with candidate evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2022.2099585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2022.2099585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究调查了总统候选人评价与在五个社交媒体平台上关注候选人之间的关系:Facebook、Twitter、Instagram、Snapchat和YouTube。2020年总统竞选期间收集的全国调查数据分析(N = 2120)表明,即使在考虑了性别、年龄、种族、教育、政党认同和在线新闻媒体使用之后,在SM上关注候选人也与对该候选人的感情呈正相关。具体而言,在脸书、推特和/或YouTube上关注特朗普的人比不关注他的人更支持他。在人口统计变量、政党身份和在线新闻媒体使用得到控制后,拜登在脸书、推特、Instagram和/或Snapchat上的关注与他的体温计评分呈正相关。此外,我们发现,这些积极的关系在那些不认同主要政党之一的人中更为明显。然而,追随候选人并不一定与对对方候选人的支持率下降有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了政治家在竞选期间使用社交媒体的重要性,并表明在不同的SM平台上关注候选人与候选人评价有着独特的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Candidate Evaluations and Social Media Following during the 2020 Presidential Campaign
ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between presidential candidate evaluations and following the candidates on five social media (SM) platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube. Analyses of national survey data collected during the 2020 presidential campaign (N = 2,120) suggest that following a candidate on SM is positively associated with feelings toward that candidate, even after gender, age, race, education, party identification, and online news media use have been taken into consideration. Specifically, individuals who followed Trump on Facebook, Twitter, and/or YouTube supported him more than did those who did not follow him. Following Biden on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and/or Snapchat was positively associated with his feeling thermometer ratings after demographic variables, party identification, and online news media use were controlled. Moreover, we show that these positive relationships were more pronounced among those who did not identify with one of the major political parties. Following a candidate, however, was not necessarily associated with decreased support for the opposing candidate. Overall, our results highlight the importance of politicians’ use of social media during campaigns and suggest that following candidates on different SM platforms has unique relationships with candidate evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Marketing
Journal of Political Marketing POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Marketing aims to be the leading scholarly journal examining the latest developments in the application of marketing methods to politics. As the political world becomes more complex and interwoven, it is imperative for all interested parties to stay abreast of “cutting edge” tools that are used in unique and different ways in countries around the world. The journal goes beyond the application of advertising to politics to study various strategic marketing tools such as: Voter segmentation Candidate positioning Use of multivariate statistical modeling to better understand the thinking and choices made by voters.
期刊最新文献
Democratic Malaise: A Proposed Theoretical Conceptualization for Marketing Malaise The Influences of Political Strategies and Communication Styles on Political Candidates’ Online and Offline Visibility Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election Political Campaign Professionalization in Lithuanian Elections Professionalization of Campaign Communication beyond Communication Forms. An Analysis of Poland’s Political Spots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1