康德判断力哲学对赫奇森观点的接受

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Warminskie Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.31648/sw.6452
Marta Śliwa
{"title":"康德判断力哲学对赫奇森观点的接受","authors":"Marta Śliwa","doi":"10.31648/sw.6452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following dissertation aims at presenting the dependencies between the aesthetic theory by the Scottish philosopher Francis Hutcheson and the critic philosophy by Immanuel Kant. Those issues seem to be worth discussing in the light of some new research into the British aesthetics: particularly, for its significance in the field of newly created domain that aesthetic has become after Alexander Baumgarten and, mostly, after critical philosophy by Immanuel Kant. The comparison of the views held by Hutcheson and Kant shows the importance of the theory of beauty presented by the Scottish philosopher that results not only from his acknowledging the epistemological significance of an aesthetic experience and accepting that it is conditioned by disinterestedness of perception. What is important is Hutcheson’s place in the evolution of the concept of aesthetics, which took place in the 18th century and which was crowned by Kant and his Critique of the Power of Judgment.","PeriodicalId":41091,"journal":{"name":"Studia Warminskie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reception of Francis Hutcheson’s Views in Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy of the Power of Judgment\",\"authors\":\"Marta Śliwa\",\"doi\":\"10.31648/sw.6452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following dissertation aims at presenting the dependencies between the aesthetic theory by the Scottish philosopher Francis Hutcheson and the critic philosophy by Immanuel Kant. Those issues seem to be worth discussing in the light of some new research into the British aesthetics: particularly, for its significance in the field of newly created domain that aesthetic has become after Alexander Baumgarten and, mostly, after critical philosophy by Immanuel Kant. The comparison of the views held by Hutcheson and Kant shows the importance of the theory of beauty presented by the Scottish philosopher that results not only from his acknowledging the epistemological significance of an aesthetic experience and accepting that it is conditioned by disinterestedness of perception. What is important is Hutcheson’s place in the evolution of the concept of aesthetics, which took place in the 18th century and which was crowned by Kant and his Critique of the Power of Judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Warminskie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Warminskie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.6452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Warminskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.6452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨苏格兰哲学家赫奇森的美学理论与康德的批评哲学之间的相互依存关系。从对英国美学的一些新研究来看,这些问题似乎值得讨论:特别是在亚历山大·鲍姆加滕之后,尤其是在伊曼纽尔·康德的批判哲学之后,美学在新创造的领域中具有重要意义。Hutcheson和Kant的观点比较表明了这位苏格兰哲学家提出的美理论的重要性,这不仅源于他承认审美体验的认识论意义,并接受它是由感知的不感兴趣性决定的。重要的是哈奇森在美学概念演变中的地位,美学概念发生在18世纪,康德及其《判断力批判》为其加冕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reception of Francis Hutcheson’s Views in Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy of the Power of Judgment
The following dissertation aims at presenting the dependencies between the aesthetic theory by the Scottish philosopher Francis Hutcheson and the critic philosophy by Immanuel Kant. Those issues seem to be worth discussing in the light of some new research into the British aesthetics: particularly, for its significance in the field of newly created domain that aesthetic has become after Alexander Baumgarten and, mostly, after critical philosophy by Immanuel Kant. The comparison of the views held by Hutcheson and Kant shows the importance of the theory of beauty presented by the Scottish philosopher that results not only from his acknowledging the epistemological significance of an aesthetic experience and accepting that it is conditioned by disinterestedness of perception. What is important is Hutcheson’s place in the evolution of the concept of aesthetics, which took place in the 18th century and which was crowned by Kant and his Critique of the Power of Judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Warminskie
Studia Warminskie HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Normalization Policy of Ukrainian-Polish Relations in the mid-1930s: Essence, Causes, and Preconditions Nawiązania do św. Augustyna w Expositio Symboli Apostolorum Jana z Kwidzyna Omnis enim rei inspectio etymologia cognita planior est. Etymologia w ujęciu Izydora z Sewilli i jej egzemplifikacja w świetle koncepcji i metod współczesnego polskiego językoznawstwa historycznego The Existence of Personality and Hikikomori State: a Socio-Philosophical Reflection on the Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic Establishment of the Art Market in the Context of Ukrainian Historical and Cultural Tradition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1