雄激素剥夺治疗产品的制备和给药:回顾性调查结果

Evan R. Goldfischer MD, MBA, ElizaBeth Grubb PhD, MBA, Paul Nisbet PhD
{"title":"雄激素剥夺治疗产品的制备和给药:回顾性调查结果","authors":"Evan R. Goldfischer MD, MBA,&nbsp;ElizaBeth Grubb PhD, MBA,&nbsp;Paul Nisbet PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leuprolide acetate (LA) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist used as androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. LA is available in formulations intended for intramuscular (IM-LA) or subcutaneous (SC-LA) administration. Post-marketing reports have noted handling errors associated with the preparation and administration of SC-LA. This study gathered real-world evidence on administration and management of IM-LA and SC-LA in large, urology- or oncology-based practices. Over 200 staff were invited; 151 participated in an online survey. Main outcomes were time for each step of the ordering, inventory, mixing and administration processes. Mean values and standard errors are reported for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage are reported for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were made with <i>t</i> tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. For IM-LA and SC-LA, ease of ordering and time to place an order (10.8 ± 1.3 vs. 10.6 ± 1.4 min, respectively) were similar. IM-LA was associated with a shorter time to complete preparation (2.5 ± 0.2 vs. 6.1 ± 0.6 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with SC-LA. This difference of 3.6 min per preparation could result in substantial time savings annually ranging from 120 h per year to 240 h per year in clinical practices administering 2000 injections per year or 4000 injections per year, respectively. For IM-LA vs. SC-LA, greater ease of preparation was reported by 64% vs. 43% of respondents, respectively. Over 15% of respondents used injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information, regardless of the type of injection. This study found that it takes a significantly shorter time to prepare and administer IM-LA than SC-LA in large urology- and oncology-based practices. The time saved could be utilized for other tasks such as seeing additional patients. Use of injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information suggests a need for more training of nursing staff in the proper administration of these drugs to ensure adequate testosterone suppression and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 2","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12342","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparation and administration of androgen deprivation therapy products: Retrospective survey results\",\"authors\":\"Evan R. Goldfischer MD, MBA,&nbsp;ElizaBeth Grubb PhD, MBA,&nbsp;Paul Nisbet PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Leuprolide acetate (LA) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist used as androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. LA is available in formulations intended for intramuscular (IM-LA) or subcutaneous (SC-LA) administration. Post-marketing reports have noted handling errors associated with the preparation and administration of SC-LA. This study gathered real-world evidence on administration and management of IM-LA and SC-LA in large, urology- or oncology-based practices. Over 200 staff were invited; 151 participated in an online survey. Main outcomes were time for each step of the ordering, inventory, mixing and administration processes. Mean values and standard errors are reported for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage are reported for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were made with <i>t</i> tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. For IM-LA and SC-LA, ease of ordering and time to place an order (10.8 ± 1.3 vs. 10.6 ± 1.4 min, respectively) were similar. IM-LA was associated with a shorter time to complete preparation (2.5 ± 0.2 vs. 6.1 ± 0.6 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with SC-LA. This difference of 3.6 min per preparation could result in substantial time savings annually ranging from 120 h per year to 240 h per year in clinical practices administering 2000 injections per year or 4000 injections per year, respectively. For IM-LA vs. SC-LA, greater ease of preparation was reported by 64% vs. 43% of respondents, respectively. Over 15% of respondents used injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information, regardless of the type of injection. This study found that it takes a significantly shorter time to prepare and administer IM-LA than SC-LA in large urology- and oncology-based practices. The time saved could be utilized for other tasks such as seeing additional patients. Use of injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information suggests a need for more training of nursing staff in the proper administration of these drugs to ensure adequate testosterone suppression and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"97-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12342\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

醋酸Leuprolide (LA)是一种促性腺激素释放激素激动剂,用于晚期前列腺癌的雄激素剥夺治疗。LA可用于肌内(IM-LA)或皮下(SC-LA)给药的配方。上市后报告指出了与SC-LA的制备和管理相关的处理错误。本研究收集了在大型泌尿科或肿瘤学实践中IM-LA和SC-LA的给药和管理的真实证据。邀请了200多名员工;151人参与了在线调查。主要结果是订购、库存、混合和管理过程的每个步骤的时间。连续变量报告平均值和标准误差,分类变量报告频率和百分比。组间比较酌情采用t检验和卡方检验。IM-LA和SC-LA的订货便利性和下单时间(分别为10.8±1.3分钟和10.6±1.4分钟)相似。与SC-LA相比,IM-LA完成制备的时间更短(2.5±0.2 vs. 6.1±0.6 min, P < 0.001)。每种制剂3.6分钟的差异每年可节省大量时间,在临床实践中,每年分别注射2000针或4000针,每年可节省120至240小时的时间。对于IM-LA和SC-LA,分别有64%和43%的受访者表示更容易准备。超过15%的答复者使用了与处方信息不一致的注射地点,无论注射类型如何。本研究发现,在大型泌尿外科和肿瘤学实践中,IM-LA的准备和使用时间明显短于SC-LA。节省下来的时间可以用于其他任务,比如看更多的病人。使用与处方信息不一致的注射部位表明,需要对护理人员进行更多的培训,以正确使用这些药物,以确保充分的睾酮抑制和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preparation and administration of androgen deprivation therapy products: Retrospective survey results

Leuprolide acetate (LA) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist used as androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. LA is available in formulations intended for intramuscular (IM-LA) or subcutaneous (SC-LA) administration. Post-marketing reports have noted handling errors associated with the preparation and administration of SC-LA. This study gathered real-world evidence on administration and management of IM-LA and SC-LA in large, urology- or oncology-based practices. Over 200 staff were invited; 151 participated in an online survey. Main outcomes were time for each step of the ordering, inventory, mixing and administration processes. Mean values and standard errors are reported for continuous variables, and frequency and percentage are reported for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were made with t tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. For IM-LA and SC-LA, ease of ordering and time to place an order (10.8 ± 1.3 vs. 10.6 ± 1.4 min, respectively) were similar. IM-LA was associated with a shorter time to complete preparation (2.5 ± 0.2 vs. 6.1 ± 0.6 min, P < 0.001) compared with SC-LA. This difference of 3.6 min per preparation could result in substantial time savings annually ranging from 120 h per year to 240 h per year in clinical practices administering 2000 injections per year or 4000 injections per year, respectively. For IM-LA vs. SC-LA, greater ease of preparation was reported by 64% vs. 43% of respondents, respectively. Over 15% of respondents used injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information, regardless of the type of injection. This study found that it takes a significantly shorter time to prepare and administer IM-LA than SC-LA in large urology- and oncology-based practices. The time saved could be utilized for other tasks such as seeing additional patients. Use of injection sites inconsistent with prescribing information suggests a need for more training of nursing staff in the proper administration of these drugs to ensure adequate testosterone suppression and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1