H. Karabulut, S. E. Güvercin, J. Hollingsworth, A. Konca
{"title":"东安纳托利亚断裂带(土耳其南部)的长期沉默以地震间隙上毁灭性的两次地震(2023年2月6日)结束:对东地中海地区地震潜力的影响","authors":"H. Karabulut, S. E. Güvercin, J. Hollingsworth, A. Konca","doi":"10.1144/jgs2023-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the 06th February 2023, an earthquake with magnitude ∼Mw7.0 on the Narlı Fault, a fault subparallel to the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), initiated a chain of large earthquakes on the EAFZ. The earthquakes occurred in a seismic gap with low geodetic strain rates, low background seismicity, where deformation is distributed across a wide fault zone and long recurrence time of historical earthquakes. The ∼50 km long rupture of the Narlı Fault towards Pazarcık, led to Mw7.8 left-lateral strike-slip earthquake breaking ∼300 km section of the ∼600 km long EAFZ bilaterally with a total duration of more than 80 s. Toward the southwest, the rupture propagated on ∼100 km long Amanos segment with a peak surface offset of 5 m, before diminishing toward the Hatay graben. In the northeast direction, the rupture reached a peak surface offset of 7 m before sharply declining at the termination of the 2020, Mw6.8 Sivrice earthquake rupture. A second large earthquake with Mw7.6 occurred 9 hours later on the Çardak Fault, located at the western margin of (and sub-parallel to) the EAFZ breaking the surface with almost 9 m left-lateral slip (average of ∼4 m). Following these large earthquakes, the increase in the regional stress led to a rapid seismic activation in a broad region from central to eastern Anatolia loading the faults at various scales and increasing seismic hazard. Two weeks after the initiation of the seismic crisis, a third earthquake with Mw6.4 occurred at the southern boundary of the Hatay graben, near the southwestern termination of the Amanos rupture. The earthquakes caused significant loss of human life, devastating 12 cities. We evaluate the observations prior to the ruptures, present preliminary seismological results with surface displacements from sub-pixel correlation of optical satellite images and the stress perturbations computed on the nearby faults based on preliminary slip models. The reevaluation of the seismic potential in light of the recent and historical earthquakes provides some new insight on seismic hazard assessment. The recent series of events on the EAFZ is an important reminder that large faults can generate very large earthquakes of multiple segments. The seismic potential of large earthquakes on these fault zones can only be estimated by considering multiple seismic cycles, and moment deficits from very large earthquakes.\n \n Supplementary material:\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6567094\n","PeriodicalId":17320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Geological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long silence on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Southern Turkey) ends with devastating double earthquakes (6 February 2023) over a seismic gap: Implications for the seismic potential in the Eastern Mediterranean region\",\"authors\":\"H. Karabulut, S. E. Güvercin, J. Hollingsworth, A. Konca\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/jgs2023-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the 06th February 2023, an earthquake with magnitude ∼Mw7.0 on the Narlı Fault, a fault subparallel to the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), initiated a chain of large earthquakes on the EAFZ. The earthquakes occurred in a seismic gap with low geodetic strain rates, low background seismicity, where deformation is distributed across a wide fault zone and long recurrence time of historical earthquakes. The ∼50 km long rupture of the Narlı Fault towards Pazarcık, led to Mw7.8 left-lateral strike-slip earthquake breaking ∼300 km section of the ∼600 km long EAFZ bilaterally with a total duration of more than 80 s. Toward the southwest, the rupture propagated on ∼100 km long Amanos segment with a peak surface offset of 5 m, before diminishing toward the Hatay graben. In the northeast direction, the rupture reached a peak surface offset of 7 m before sharply declining at the termination of the 2020, Mw6.8 Sivrice earthquake rupture. A second large earthquake with Mw7.6 occurred 9 hours later on the Çardak Fault, located at the western margin of (and sub-parallel to) the EAFZ breaking the surface with almost 9 m left-lateral slip (average of ∼4 m). Following these large earthquakes, the increase in the regional stress led to a rapid seismic activation in a broad region from central to eastern Anatolia loading the faults at various scales and increasing seismic hazard. Two weeks after the initiation of the seismic crisis, a third earthquake with Mw6.4 occurred at the southern boundary of the Hatay graben, near the southwestern termination of the Amanos rupture. The earthquakes caused significant loss of human life, devastating 12 cities. We evaluate the observations prior to the ruptures, present preliminary seismological results with surface displacements from sub-pixel correlation of optical satellite images and the stress perturbations computed on the nearby faults based on preliminary slip models. The reevaluation of the seismic potential in light of the recent and historical earthquakes provides some new insight on seismic hazard assessment. The recent series of events on the EAFZ is an important reminder that large faults can generate very large earthquakes of multiple segments. The seismic potential of large earthquakes on these fault zones can only be estimated by considering multiple seismic cycles, and moment deficits from very large earthquakes.\\n \\n Supplementary material:\\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6567094\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Geological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Geological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Geological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long silence on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Southern Turkey) ends with devastating double earthquakes (6 February 2023) over a seismic gap: Implications for the seismic potential in the Eastern Mediterranean region
On the 06th February 2023, an earthquake with magnitude ∼Mw7.0 on the Narlı Fault, a fault subparallel to the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), initiated a chain of large earthquakes on the EAFZ. The earthquakes occurred in a seismic gap with low geodetic strain rates, low background seismicity, where deformation is distributed across a wide fault zone and long recurrence time of historical earthquakes. The ∼50 km long rupture of the Narlı Fault towards Pazarcık, led to Mw7.8 left-lateral strike-slip earthquake breaking ∼300 km section of the ∼600 km long EAFZ bilaterally with a total duration of more than 80 s. Toward the southwest, the rupture propagated on ∼100 km long Amanos segment with a peak surface offset of 5 m, before diminishing toward the Hatay graben. In the northeast direction, the rupture reached a peak surface offset of 7 m before sharply declining at the termination of the 2020, Mw6.8 Sivrice earthquake rupture. A second large earthquake with Mw7.6 occurred 9 hours later on the Çardak Fault, located at the western margin of (and sub-parallel to) the EAFZ breaking the surface with almost 9 m left-lateral slip (average of ∼4 m). Following these large earthquakes, the increase in the regional stress led to a rapid seismic activation in a broad region from central to eastern Anatolia loading the faults at various scales and increasing seismic hazard. Two weeks after the initiation of the seismic crisis, a third earthquake with Mw6.4 occurred at the southern boundary of the Hatay graben, near the southwestern termination of the Amanos rupture. The earthquakes caused significant loss of human life, devastating 12 cities. We evaluate the observations prior to the ruptures, present preliminary seismological results with surface displacements from sub-pixel correlation of optical satellite images and the stress perturbations computed on the nearby faults based on preliminary slip models. The reevaluation of the seismic potential in light of the recent and historical earthquakes provides some new insight on seismic hazard assessment. The recent series of events on the EAFZ is an important reminder that large faults can generate very large earthquakes of multiple segments. The seismic potential of large earthquakes on these fault zones can only be estimated by considering multiple seismic cycles, and moment deficits from very large earthquakes.
Supplementary material:
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6567094
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Geological Society (JGS) is owned and published by the Geological Society of London.
JGS publishes topical, high-quality recent research across the full range of Earth Sciences. Papers are interdisciplinary in nature and emphasize the development of an understanding of fundamental geological processes. Broad interest articles that refer to regional studies, but which extend beyond their geographical context are also welcomed.
Each year JGS presents the ‘JGS Early Career Award'' for papers published in the journal, which rewards the writing of well-written, exciting papers from early career geologists.
The journal publishes research and invited review articles, discussion papers and thematic sets.