身体监护安排和父亲分离后的幸福感

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Studies Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1080/13229400.2022.2108720
Lara Augustijn
{"title":"身体监护安排和父亲分离后的幸福感","authors":"Lara Augustijn","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2022.2108720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Joint physical custody (JPC) is an emerging post-separation care arrangement in which children spend considerable periods of time with both of their parents. Although there is some research on JPC that has focused on children’s well-being, little is known about how this physical custody arrangement affects fathers’ well-being. Therefore, this study investigated the well-being of fathers with symmetric JPC and of non-resident fathers whose children live either mostly or exclusively with their mother. The statistical analysis draws on longitudinal data from waves 4–12 of the German Family Panel (pairfam). Random- and fixed-effects regression models were estimated for 1,372 observations of 389 fathers. The results of the bivariate random-effects models showed that fathers with symmetric JPC reported higher life satisfaction than other fathers. However, the fixed-effects model indicated that these differences were due to positive selection into symmetric JPC. Moreover, the results of the multivariate random- and fixed-effects models showed no statistically significant relationship between physical custody arrangements and fathers’ stress, depressiveness, life satisfaction, and general health. Taken together, this study suggests that physical custody arrangements are unrelated to fathers’ post-separation well-being while hinting at the relevance of selection processes among post-separation families.","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"2008 - 2024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical custody arrangements and fathers’ post-separation well-being\",\"authors\":\"Lara Augustijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13229400.2022.2108720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Joint physical custody (JPC) is an emerging post-separation care arrangement in which children spend considerable periods of time with both of their parents. Although there is some research on JPC that has focused on children’s well-being, little is known about how this physical custody arrangement affects fathers’ well-being. Therefore, this study investigated the well-being of fathers with symmetric JPC and of non-resident fathers whose children live either mostly or exclusively with their mother. The statistical analysis draws on longitudinal data from waves 4–12 of the German Family Panel (pairfam). Random- and fixed-effects regression models were estimated for 1,372 observations of 389 fathers. The results of the bivariate random-effects models showed that fathers with symmetric JPC reported higher life satisfaction than other fathers. However, the fixed-effects model indicated that these differences were due to positive selection into symmetric JPC. Moreover, the results of the multivariate random- and fixed-effects models showed no statistically significant relationship between physical custody arrangements and fathers’ stress, depressiveness, life satisfaction, and general health. Taken together, this study suggests that physical custody arrangements are unrelated to fathers’ post-separation well-being while hinting at the relevance of selection processes among post-separation families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"2008 - 2024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2108720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2108720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:共同物理监护(JPC)是一种新兴的分离后护理安排,在这种安排中,孩子们要花相当长的时间与父母双方在一起。尽管JPC的一些研究关注的是儿童的幸福感,但人们对这种身体监护安排如何影响父亲的幸福感知之甚少。因此,本研究调查了对称JPC的父亲和子女主要或完全与母亲生活在一起的非居民父亲的幸福感。统计分析采用了德国家庭小组(pairfam)第4-12波的纵向数据。对389名父亲的1372次观察结果估计了随机和固定效应回归模型。双变量随机效应模型的结果表明,具有对称JPC的父亲比其他父亲的生活满意度更高。然而,固定效应模型表明,这些差异是由于对对称JPC的积极选择造成的。此外,多变量随机效应和固定效应模型的结果显示,物理监护安排与父亲的压力、抑郁、生活满意度和总体健康之间没有统计学上的显著关系。总之,这项研究表明,实际监护安排与父亲分离后的幸福感无关,同时暗示了分离后家庭选择过程的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical custody arrangements and fathers’ post-separation well-being
ABSTRACT Joint physical custody (JPC) is an emerging post-separation care arrangement in which children spend considerable periods of time with both of their parents. Although there is some research on JPC that has focused on children’s well-being, little is known about how this physical custody arrangement affects fathers’ well-being. Therefore, this study investigated the well-being of fathers with symmetric JPC and of non-resident fathers whose children live either mostly or exclusively with their mother. The statistical analysis draws on longitudinal data from waves 4–12 of the German Family Panel (pairfam). Random- and fixed-effects regression models were estimated for 1,372 observations of 389 fathers. The results of the bivariate random-effects models showed that fathers with symmetric JPC reported higher life satisfaction than other fathers. However, the fixed-effects model indicated that these differences were due to positive selection into symmetric JPC. Moreover, the results of the multivariate random- and fixed-effects models showed no statistically significant relationship between physical custody arrangements and fathers’ stress, depressiveness, life satisfaction, and general health. Taken together, this study suggests that physical custody arrangements are unrelated to fathers’ post-separation well-being while hinting at the relevance of selection processes among post-separation families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
期刊最新文献
Cisgender men’s narratives about their desires to be pregnant: re/constructing reproduction, gender, and their entanglement Good normative parenting: towards a non-teleological and relational ideal African single mothers and their children in Canada: transnational experiences and sources of support Composition of Ukrainian households under forced migration and its impact on livelihood opportunities at early stage of stay in Krakow Introduction to a special issue in memoriam Michael Rush: the politics of fatherhood around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1