Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee
{"title":"考虑补贴政策影响的住宅光伏系统投资的经济可行性——以韩国为例","authors":"Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"66 1","pages":"206 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"206 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case
Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.
Engineering EconomistENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment.
The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.