考虑补贴政策影响的住宅光伏系统投资的经济可行性——以韩国为例

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS Engineering Economist Pub Date : 2020-10-12 DOI:10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119
Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee
{"title":"考虑补贴政策影响的住宅光伏系统投资的经济可行性——以韩国为例","authors":"Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"66 1","pages":"206 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Jong Jang, Moonkyu Seo, Gi-Yu Nam, Deok-Joo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"206 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1831119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要投资的经济可行性对于住宅用户投资光伏系统的决策至关重要,因为安装光伏技术的高成本可能会带来负担。因此,许多国家的政府一直在实施政策,以减轻家庭用户光伏投资的经济负担,从而向家庭用户推广太阳能。本文的目的是利用韩国的经验数据,对住宅光伏系统的投资进行经济可行性分析,考虑几种补贴计划替代方案的影响。结果表明,住宅光伏投资项目在没有补贴的情况下在经济上是可行的;然而,投资回收期超过8 年,这可能被住宅客户认为时间太长,目前不足以投资光伏系统。此外,我们发现,基于生产的补贴计划的净现值最高,而一次性补贴的回收期最短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic feasibility of the investment in residential photovoltaics system considering the effects of subsidy policies: A Korean case
Abstract The economic feasibility of the investment is critical for residential users’ decision making in investing in photovoltaic (PV) systems because the high costs of installing PV technology may be burdensome. Therefore, governments in many countries have been implementing policies to reduce the economic burden of household users' PV investments and thus promote solar energy to household users. The purpose of this paper is to perform an economic feasibility analysis of investments in residential PV systems that considers the effects of several subsidy plan alternatives using the empirical data of Korea. The result shows that the residential PV investment project would be economically viable without subsidy; however, a payback period exceeds 8 years, which could be perceived by residential customers as too long to be attractive enough to invest in a PV system at present. In addition, we found that the net present value is highest under the production based subsidy scheme, whereas the payback period is shortest with a lump-sum subsidy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Economist
Engineering Economist ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment. The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.
期刊最新文献
Introducing a real option framework for EVA/MVA analysis Avoiding momentum crashes using stochastic mean-CVaR optimization with time-varying risk aversion The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation Optimization-based tail risk hedging of the S&P 500 index Letter from the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1