院外心脏骤停后自然循环恢复时间与预后的关系

Huixin Lian, Andong Xia, Xinyan Qin, S. Tian, Xuqin Kang, Luxi Zhang, Shengmei Niu, Fei Qin, Jinjun Zhang
{"title":"院外心脏骤停后自然循环恢复时间与预后的关系","authors":"Huixin Lian, Andong Xia, Xinyan Qin, S. Tian, Xuqin Kang, Luxi Zhang, Shengmei Niu, Fei Qin, Jinjun Zhang","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a core outcome element of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); however, the definition or criterion of ROSC is disputed and varies in resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods This was a retrospective study of 126 patients with OHCA who achieved ROSC between January and December 2020. The probability of survival after OHCA related to CPR and ROSC duration was analyzed using the probability density function and empirical cumulative density functions. Results There were no significant differences between ROSC sustained until emergency department arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes in terms of the 24-hour survival rate (31.3% [31/99] vs. 35.7% [10/30]; P = 0.84), 30-day survival rate (23.2% [23/99] vs. 25.0% [7/30]; P = 0.99), or survival at 30 days with cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 and 2 (18.2% [18/99] vs. 10.7% [3/30]; P = 0.44). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test values from the empirical cumulative density functions with ROSC sustained until hospital arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes were 0.44, 0.20, and 0.24 for CPC 1 or 2, CPC 3 or 4, and CPC 5, respectively. Conclusion Return of spontaneous circulation is a core outcome element of CPR. It should be defined as sustained for at least 20 minutes or until arrival at the emergency department and as a basic standard for evaluating resuscitation success after OHCA.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between duration of return of spontaneous circulation and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest\",\"authors\":\"Huixin Lian, Andong Xia, Xinyan Qin, S. Tian, Xuqin Kang, Luxi Zhang, Shengmei Niu, Fei Qin, Jinjun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a core outcome element of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); however, the definition or criterion of ROSC is disputed and varies in resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods This was a retrospective study of 126 patients with OHCA who achieved ROSC between January and December 2020. The probability of survival after OHCA related to CPR and ROSC duration was analyzed using the probability density function and empirical cumulative density functions. Results There were no significant differences between ROSC sustained until emergency department arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes in terms of the 24-hour survival rate (31.3% [31/99] vs. 35.7% [10/30]; P = 0.84), 30-day survival rate (23.2% [23/99] vs. 25.0% [7/30]; P = 0.99), or survival at 30 days with cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 and 2 (18.2% [18/99] vs. 10.7% [3/30]; P = 0.44). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test values from the empirical cumulative density functions with ROSC sustained until hospital arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes were 0.44, 0.20, and 0.24 for CPC 1 or 2, CPC 3 or 4, and CPC 5, respectively. Conclusion Return of spontaneous circulation is a core outcome element of CPR. It should be defined as sustained for at least 20 minutes or until arrival at the emergency department and as a basic standard for evaluating resuscitation success after OHCA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景自主循环恢复(ROSC)是心肺复苏(CPR)的核心结果要素;然而,ROSC的定义或标准在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的复苏中存在争议和差异。方法这是一项对2020年1月至12月期间126名实现ROSC的OHCA患者的回顾性研究。使用概率密度函数和经验累积密度函数分析OHCA后与CPR和ROSC持续时间相关的生存概率。结果ROSC在24小时生存率(31.3%[31/99]对35.7%[10/30];P=0.084)、30天生存率(23.2%[23/99]对25.0%[7/30];P=0.99)、,或大脑功能类别(CPC)1和2的30天生存率(18.2%[18/99]对10.7%[3/30];P=0.44)。ROSC持续到医院和持续至少20分钟的经验累积密度函数的Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验值,CPC 1或2、CPC 3或4和CPC 5分别为0.44、0.20和0.24。结论自主循环的恢复是心肺复苏术的核心结果。它应该被定义为持续至少20分钟或直到到达急诊科,并作为评估OHCA后复苏成功的基本标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between duration of return of spontaneous circulation and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Abstract Background Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a core outcome element of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); however, the definition or criterion of ROSC is disputed and varies in resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods This was a retrospective study of 126 patients with OHCA who achieved ROSC between January and December 2020. The probability of survival after OHCA related to CPR and ROSC duration was analyzed using the probability density function and empirical cumulative density functions. Results There were no significant differences between ROSC sustained until emergency department arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes in terms of the 24-hour survival rate (31.3% [31/99] vs. 35.7% [10/30]; P = 0.84), 30-day survival rate (23.2% [23/99] vs. 25.0% [7/30]; P = 0.99), or survival at 30 days with cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 and 2 (18.2% [18/99] vs. 10.7% [3/30]; P = 0.44). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test values from the empirical cumulative density functions with ROSC sustained until hospital arrival and that sustained for at least 20 minutes were 0.44, 0.20, and 0.24 for CPC 1 or 2, CPC 3 or 4, and CPC 5, respectively. Conclusion Return of spontaneous circulation is a core outcome element of CPR. It should be defined as sustained for at least 20 minutes or until arrival at the emergency department and as a basic standard for evaluating resuscitation success after OHCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of patients with deep sternal wound infection-induced sepsis: a retrospective cohort study Exploring the effects of coronary artery disease as a preexisting comorbidity on mortality in hospitalized septic patients: a retrospective observation study An unusual anterior mitral leaflet perforation in a patient with no infective endocarditis: a case report Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in critically ill patients: does bedside laparoscopy offer any real benefit? Congestive heart failure and sepsis a retrospective study of hospitalization outcomes from a rural hospital in Southwest Missouri: Erratum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1