传统投资与绿色投资:推动创新以改善金融和环境前景

IF 3.8 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822
Muhammad Azhar Khalil, Kridsda Nimmanunta
{"title":"传统投资与绿色投资:推动创新以改善金融和环境前景","authors":"Muhammad Azhar Khalil, Kridsda Nimmanunta","doi":"10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recently, the level of climate change has substantially been rising; relatively not much is known on ‘how’ companies alter the association between their environmental performance and financial performance within the context of specific elements of innovation: conventional innovation and green innovation. Drawing upon the stakeholder theory and the natural resource-based view of the firm, this research uses firm-level Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data of 462 companies across 7 Asian countries for the period 2015–2019 and employs time fixed-effects panel regression with country and industry dummies. We find that measures of innovation (i.e. conventional innovation and green innovation) are beneficial to the firm value. However, the positive effect of conventional innovation on the firm valuation builds at the expense of the environment since it poses a significant threat to environmental quality by positively contributing to carbon emission. Whilst firms’ investments in green innovation are advantageous to either type of firm performance. Further analysis shows that firms that focus on environmental practices generate significant outcomes, e.g. improved financial performance, suggesting that firms should prioritize their green investments to enhance the innovation outcomes so as to achieve superior financial value and to attract potential environmentally proactive stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":45546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment","volume":"13 1","pages":"1153 - 1180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional versus green investments: advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Azhar Khalil, Kridsda Nimmanunta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recently, the level of climate change has substantially been rising; relatively not much is known on ‘how’ companies alter the association between their environmental performance and financial performance within the context of specific elements of innovation: conventional innovation and green innovation. Drawing upon the stakeholder theory and the natural resource-based view of the firm, this research uses firm-level Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data of 462 companies across 7 Asian countries for the period 2015–2019 and employs time fixed-effects panel regression with country and industry dummies. We find that measures of innovation (i.e. conventional innovation and green innovation) are beneficial to the firm value. However, the positive effect of conventional innovation on the firm valuation builds at the expense of the environment since it poses a significant threat to environmental quality by positively contributing to carbon emission. Whilst firms’ investments in green innovation are advantageous to either type of firm performance. Further analysis shows that firms that focus on environmental practices generate significant outcomes, e.g. improved financial performance, suggesting that firms should prioritize their green investments to enhance the innovation outcomes so as to achieve superior financial value and to attract potential environmentally proactive stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1153 - 1180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

近年来,气候变化水平显著上升;相对而言,在创新的特定元素:传统创新和绿色创新的背景下,公司“如何”改变其环境绩效和财务绩效之间的关系,人们所知的并不多。根据利益相关者理论和基于自然资源的企业观点,本研究使用了2015-2019年期间亚洲7个国家462家公司的企业层面的环境、社会和治理(ESG)数据,并采用了时间固定效应面板回归与国家和行业假人。研究发现,创新措施(即传统创新和绿色创新)有利于企业价值的提升。然而,传统创新对企业估值的积极影响是以牺牲环境为代价的,因为它通过积极促进碳排放对环境质量构成重大威胁。而企业在绿色创新方面的投资对两种类型的企业绩效都是有利的。进一步的分析表明,注重环境实践的企业产生了显著的成果,例如改善的财务绩效,这表明企业应该优先考虑绿色投资,以提高创新成果,从而实现卓越的财务价值,并吸引潜在的环保积极的利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conventional versus green investments: advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects
ABSTRACT Recently, the level of climate change has substantially been rising; relatively not much is known on ‘how’ companies alter the association between their environmental performance and financial performance within the context of specific elements of innovation: conventional innovation and green innovation. Drawing upon the stakeholder theory and the natural resource-based view of the firm, this research uses firm-level Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data of 462 companies across 7 Asian countries for the period 2015–2019 and employs time fixed-effects panel regression with country and industry dummies. We find that measures of innovation (i.e. conventional innovation and green innovation) are beneficial to the firm value. However, the positive effect of conventional innovation on the firm valuation builds at the expense of the environment since it poses a significant threat to environmental quality by positively contributing to carbon emission. Whilst firms’ investments in green innovation are advantageous to either type of firm performance. Further analysis shows that firms that focus on environmental practices generate significant outcomes, e.g. improved financial performance, suggesting that firms should prioritize their green investments to enhance the innovation outcomes so as to achieve superior financial value and to attract potential environmentally proactive stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
The effect of ESG scores on bank stability: Islamic vs. conventional banks Climate-related risks, firm performance and role of risk reserve funds: empirical evidence in Vietnam Carbon emissions and firm profitability Where and how machine learning plays a role in climate finance research The value of resilience bond in financing flood resilient infrastructures: a case study of Towyn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1