欧盟移民法律合规中的一般利益与个人利益的两难困境

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.18543/ced.2585
Eulalia W. Petit de Gabriel
{"title":"欧盟移民法律合规中的一般利益与个人利益的两难困境","authors":"Eulalia W. Petit de Gabriel","doi":"10.18543/ced.2585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Separating children traveling accompanied by a nonfamily adult is a current practice serving the general purpose of fighting against sexual exploitation, minor trafficking, or general crime prevention. However, such a routine response could violate a minor’s right to family life or preclude an attempted migration to reunification. Although no specific normative framework exists for this migratory category, we will draw our analysis of the conflicting interests by resorting to human rights case law. On the one hand, the expansion of the legally recognized concept of family must help protect interpersonal bonds not based on biological relationships, according to the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. On the other hand, restrictions to the right to family life can be taken for fighting against crime, although a goal of general prevention may not comply with human rights standards on the limitation of rights. The required balance between conflicting interests can be established by resorting to the best interests of the minor. To conclude, we argue that this category could certainly benefit from a concerted, common legislative action at the level of the European Union when revisiting the migration legal regime, alongside operational measures at national, regional, and local levels. \nReceived: 31 July 2022Accepted: 05 October 2022","PeriodicalId":40611,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separated Minors or the Dilemma between General and Individual Interest in European Union Migration Law Compliance\",\"authors\":\"Eulalia W. Petit de Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/ced.2585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Separating children traveling accompanied by a nonfamily adult is a current practice serving the general purpose of fighting against sexual exploitation, minor trafficking, or general crime prevention. However, such a routine response could violate a minor’s right to family life or preclude an attempted migration to reunification. Although no specific normative framework exists for this migratory category, we will draw our analysis of the conflicting interests by resorting to human rights case law. On the one hand, the expansion of the legally recognized concept of family must help protect interpersonal bonds not based on biological relationships, according to the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. On the other hand, restrictions to the right to family life can be taken for fighting against crime, although a goal of general prevention may not comply with human rights standards on the limitation of rights. The required balance between conflicting interests can be established by resorting to the best interests of the minor. To conclude, we argue that this category could certainly benefit from a concerted, common legislative action at the level of the European Union when revisiting the migration legal regime, alongside operational measures at national, regional, and local levels. \\nReceived: 31 July 2022Accepted: 05 October 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":40611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced.2585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced.2585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将儿童与非家庭成年人分开旅行是目前的一种做法,旨在打击性剥削、轻微贩运或一般犯罪预防。然而,这种常规的应对措施可能侵犯未成年人的家庭生活权,或阻止他们试图移民团聚。尽管没有针对这一移民类别的具体规范框架,但我们将通过诉诸人权判例法来分析利益冲突。欧洲人权法院和欧洲联盟法院认为,一方面,扩大法律承认的家庭概念必须有助于保护非基于生物关系的人际关系。另一方面,可以采取对家庭生活权的限制来打击犯罪,尽管一般预防的目标可能不符合关于限制权利的人权标准。通过诉诸未成年人的最大利益,可以在相互冲突的利益之间建立必要的平衡。最后,我们认为,在重新审视移民法律制度时,这一类别肯定可以受益于欧盟层面的协调一致的共同立法行动,以及国家、区域和地方层面的行动措施。接收日期:2022年7月31日接受日期:2022月5日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Separated Minors or the Dilemma between General and Individual Interest in European Union Migration Law Compliance
Separating children traveling accompanied by a nonfamily adult is a current practice serving the general purpose of fighting against sexual exploitation, minor trafficking, or general crime prevention. However, such a routine response could violate a minor’s right to family life or preclude an attempted migration to reunification. Although no specific normative framework exists for this migratory category, we will draw our analysis of the conflicting interests by resorting to human rights case law. On the one hand, the expansion of the legally recognized concept of family must help protect interpersonal bonds not based on biological relationships, according to the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. On the other hand, restrictions to the right to family life can be taken for fighting against crime, although a goal of general prevention may not comply with human rights standards on the limitation of rights. The required balance between conflicting interests can be established by resorting to the best interests of the minor. To conclude, we argue that this category could certainly benefit from a concerted, common legislative action at the level of the European Union when revisiting the migration legal regime, alongside operational measures at national, regional, and local levels. Received: 31 July 2022Accepted: 05 October 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is a university journal specialised in the study of the European Union from an interdisciplinary perspective. It primarily aims at disseminating knowledge on the different aspects of the European construction process (historical, political, legal, economic, social, cultural issues, etc.). It also aims at encouraging reflection on and critical assessment of the different factors that determine European Union''s evolution and transformation. First published in 1987, Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is issued twice a year. Its contents include a section on doctrinal articles, a section commenting the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice and a section on current European issues.
期刊最新文献
A vueltas con la regulación de las aguas de baño en la Unión Europea: ¿hacer de la necesidad, virtud? Actualidad institucional y económica de España en el marco de la Unión Europea (julio de 2024) Crónica de la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea Primer semestre de 2024 La protección del medio ambiente en situaciones de conflicto armado: implicaciones para la Unión Europea a raíz de la guerra de Ucrania El sesgado desarrollo del convenio de Aarhus en la Unión Europea. ¿Justicia para el medioambiente?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1