脑卒中后失语症的治疗:药物治疗和非侵入性脑刺激技术综述

Allison N. Capizzi, J. Woo, E. Magat
{"title":"脑卒中后失语症的治疗:药物治疗和非侵入性脑刺激技术综述","authors":"Allison N. Capizzi, J. Woo, E. Magat","doi":"10.4103/jisprm.jisprm-000151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aphasia is a common complication of stroke, often causing significant morbidity. To the authors' knowledge, no stroke recovery practice guidelines incorporating pharmacologic or noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) therapies for poststroke aphasia (PSA) exist. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding pharmacologic and NIBS treatment in PSA. An exhaustive single database search assessing treatment for PSA was performed from 2010 to 2020, resulting in 1876 articles. Articles evaluating either pharmacologic management or NIBS were included. Case reports, case series, original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were allowed. Pharmacologic treatment studies included were represented by the following medication classes: cholinergic, dopaminergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists and derivatives, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, serotonergic, and autonomic agents. NIBS treatment studies regarding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were evaluated. No strong evidence was found for any medication to improve PSA. However, the benefit of a medication trial may outweigh the risk of side effects as some evidence exists for functional recovery. Regarding NIBS, weak evidence exists for the treatment effect of tDCS and rTMS on PSA. While additional research is needed, the literature shows promise, especially in chronic phase of stroke when traditional treatment options may be exhausted. More evidence with larger studies and standardized study design is needed.","PeriodicalId":75125,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poststroke aphasia treatment: A review of pharmacologic therapies and noninvasive brain stimulation techniques\",\"authors\":\"Allison N. Capizzi, J. Woo, E. Magat\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jisprm.jisprm-000151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aphasia is a common complication of stroke, often causing significant morbidity. To the authors' knowledge, no stroke recovery practice guidelines incorporating pharmacologic or noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) therapies for poststroke aphasia (PSA) exist. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding pharmacologic and NIBS treatment in PSA. An exhaustive single database search assessing treatment for PSA was performed from 2010 to 2020, resulting in 1876 articles. Articles evaluating either pharmacologic management or NIBS were included. Case reports, case series, original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were allowed. Pharmacologic treatment studies included were represented by the following medication classes: cholinergic, dopaminergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists and derivatives, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, serotonergic, and autonomic agents. NIBS treatment studies regarding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were evaluated. No strong evidence was found for any medication to improve PSA. However, the benefit of a medication trial may outweigh the risk of side effects as some evidence exists for functional recovery. Regarding NIBS, weak evidence exists for the treatment effect of tDCS and rTMS on PSA. While additional research is needed, the literature shows promise, especially in chronic phase of stroke when traditional treatment options may be exhausted. More evidence with larger studies and standardized study design is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm-000151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisprm.jisprm-000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

失语症是中风的常见并发症,通常会导致严重的发病率。据作者所知,目前还没有结合药物或非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)治疗中风后失语症(PSA)的中风恢复实践指南。本文的目的是对PSA的药理学和NIBS治疗的证据进行全面综述。从2010年到2020年,对PSA的治疗进行了详尽的单数据库搜索,共有1876篇文章。包括评价药物管理或NIBS的文章。允许病例报告、病例系列、原始研究、系统综述和荟萃分析。药理学治疗研究包括以下药物类别:胆碱能、多巴胺能、γ-氨基丁酸激动剂和衍生物、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂、5-羟色胺能和自主神经药物。评估了关于经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)或重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的NIBS治疗研究。没有发现任何强有力的证据表明任何药物可以改善PSA。然而,药物试验的益处可能大于副作用的风险,因为有一些证据表明功能恢复。关于NIBS,缺乏证据表明tDCS和rTMS对PSA的治疗效果。虽然还需要更多的研究,但文献显示了前景,尤其是在中风的慢性期,传统的治疗方案可能已经用尽。需要通过更大规模的研究和标准化的研究设计提供更多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Poststroke aphasia treatment: A review of pharmacologic therapies and noninvasive brain stimulation techniques
Aphasia is a common complication of stroke, often causing significant morbidity. To the authors' knowledge, no stroke recovery practice guidelines incorporating pharmacologic or noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) therapies for poststroke aphasia (PSA) exist. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding pharmacologic and NIBS treatment in PSA. An exhaustive single database search assessing treatment for PSA was performed from 2010 to 2020, resulting in 1876 articles. Articles evaluating either pharmacologic management or NIBS were included. Case reports, case series, original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were allowed. Pharmacologic treatment studies included were represented by the following medication classes: cholinergic, dopaminergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists and derivatives, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, serotonergic, and autonomic agents. NIBS treatment studies regarding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were evaluated. No strong evidence was found for any medication to improve PSA. However, the benefit of a medication trial may outweigh the risk of side effects as some evidence exists for functional recovery. Regarding NIBS, weak evidence exists for the treatment effect of tDCS and rTMS on PSA. While additional research is needed, the literature shows promise, especially in chronic phase of stroke when traditional treatment options may be exhausted. More evidence with larger studies and standardized study design is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical effectiveness of a standardized community-based supervised post-acute rehabilitation model after total knee arthropathy: A pilot study. Special anatomy series. Imaging inner ear structures with high-frequency ultrasound: Application to physical rehabilitation space medicine. Keynote Speakers Oral Presentation 1 and Oral Presentation 2 Specialty Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1