美德与罪恶之间的蓝色细线:直面警务的道德危害

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW University of Pittsburgh Law Review Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.5195/lawreview.2022.907
Maurice A. Deane, G. A. Sinha
{"title":"美德与罪恶之间的蓝色细线:直面警务的道德危害","authors":"Maurice A. Deane, G. A. Sinha","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship on policing has exploded in recent years as bystanders increasingly record and circulate videos of police brutality, much of it directed at civilians of color. These incidents have drawn significant attention to the culture of police departments and police unions, generating widespread calls for the reform, or even the abolition, of police forces. The traditional considerations at the center of these debates include the practical challenges to enacting reforms, the expected efficacy of proposed changes for curtailing abuses, and the possible costs of these changes (whether measured in dollars or crime rates). The moral premises that are inherently embedded in reform arguments typically remain unstated and undefended, obscuring Associate Professor, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to present this project at an annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools and the University of Richmond School of Law Junior Faculty Forum, as well as to audiences at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, the William S. Richardson School f Law at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa, the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, and the Quinnipiac University School of Law. The paper benefitted from exchanges with Jon Abel, Alice Abreu, Scott Burris, Baruch Bush, Bill Chang, Robin Charlow, Erin Collins, Ron Colombo, Michelle Cosby, Randle DeFalco, Margaret deGuzman, Neal Feigenson, Brenner Fissell, Leslie Francis, Eric Freedman, Betsy Ginsberg, Lauryn Gouldin, Dan Greenwood, Paul Gugliuzza, Daniel Harawa, Ben Heath, Jen Herbst, Alex Klein, Stan Krauss, Guha Krishnamurthi, Julian Ku, Jamie Macleod, Jane Manners, Linda Meyer, Mark Niles, Alex Nunn, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Rachel Rebouch6, Alan Rozenshtein, Shelley Sadin, Jim Shellenberger, Norm Silber, Jocelyn Simonson, Barbara Stark, Stewart Sterk, Victoria Szymczak, Janani Umamaheswar, Louis Virelli, Richard Wallsgrove, and S. Lisa Washington. Finally, I am indebted to Kaylyn Fagan and Shannon Palm for their invaluable research assistance. All errors are my own. ISSN 0041-9915 (print) 1942-8405 (online) * DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.907 httR://lawreviewlaw.pitt.edu U NIV E R S I T Y OF P IT T S B U R G H LAW R E V I E W","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Thin Blue Line Between Virtue and Vice: Confronting the Moral Harms of Policing\",\"authors\":\"Maurice A. Deane, G. A. Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/lawreview.2022.907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholarship on policing has exploded in recent years as bystanders increasingly record and circulate videos of police brutality, much of it directed at civilians of color. These incidents have drawn significant attention to the culture of police departments and police unions, generating widespread calls for the reform, or even the abolition, of police forces. The traditional considerations at the center of these debates include the practical challenges to enacting reforms, the expected efficacy of proposed changes for curtailing abuses, and the possible costs of these changes (whether measured in dollars or crime rates). The moral premises that are inherently embedded in reform arguments typically remain unstated and undefended, obscuring Associate Professor, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to present this project at an annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools and the University of Richmond School of Law Junior Faculty Forum, as well as to audiences at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, the William S. Richardson School f Law at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa, the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, and the Quinnipiac University School of Law. The paper benefitted from exchanges with Jon Abel, Alice Abreu, Scott Burris, Baruch Bush, Bill Chang, Robin Charlow, Erin Collins, Ron Colombo, Michelle Cosby, Randle DeFalco, Margaret deGuzman, Neal Feigenson, Brenner Fissell, Leslie Francis, Eric Freedman, Betsy Ginsberg, Lauryn Gouldin, Dan Greenwood, Paul Gugliuzza, Daniel Harawa, Ben Heath, Jen Herbst, Alex Klein, Stan Krauss, Guha Krishnamurthi, Julian Ku, Jamie Macleod, Jane Manners, Linda Meyer, Mark Niles, Alex Nunn, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Rachel Rebouch6, Alan Rozenshtein, Shelley Sadin, Jim Shellenberger, Norm Silber, Jocelyn Simonson, Barbara Stark, Stewart Sterk, Victoria Szymczak, Janani Umamaheswar, Louis Virelli, Richard Wallsgrove, and S. Lisa Washington. Finally, I am indebted to Kaylyn Fagan and Shannon Palm for their invaluable research assistance. All errors are my own. ISSN 0041-9915 (print) 1942-8405 (online) * DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.907 httR://lawreviewlaw.pitt.edu U NIV E R S I T Y OF P IT T S B U R G H LAW R E V I E W\",\"PeriodicalId\":44686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pittsburgh Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,随着旁观者越来越多地记录和传播警察暴行的视频,其中大部分是针对有色人种平民的,有关警务的奖学金激增。这些事件引起了人们对警察部门和警察工会文化的极大关注,引发了改革甚至废除警察部队的广泛呼声。这些辩论的核心传统考虑因素包括实施改革的实际挑战、拟议改革对遏制滥用的预期效果,以及这些改革的可能成本(无论是以美元还是犯罪率衡量)。固有于改革论点中的道德前提通常保持不变,模糊了霍夫斯特拉大学莫里斯·A·迪恩法学院副教授。我很感激有机会在东南法学院协会和里士满大学法学院初级教师论坛的年会上介绍这个项目,并向坦普尔大学比斯利法学院、夏威夷大学马诺阿分校威廉·S·理查森法学院、莫里斯·A·。霍夫斯特拉大学迪恩法学院和昆尼皮亚克大学法学院。该报受益于与Jon Abel、Alice Abreu、Scott Burris、Baruch Bush、Bill Chang、Robin Charlow、Erin Collins、Ron Colombo、Michelle Cosby、Randle DeFalco、Margaret deGuzman、Neal Feigenson、Brenner Fissell、Leslie Francis、Eric Freedman、Betsy Ginsberg、Lauryn Gouldin、Dan Greenwood、Paul Gugliuzza、Daniel Harawa、Ben Heath、Jen Herbst、Alex Klein、Stan Krauss、,Guha Krishnamurthi、Julian Ku、Jamie Macleod、Jane Manners、Linda Meyer、Mark Niles、Alex Nunn、Jaya Ramji Nogales、Rachel Rebouch6、Alan Rozenshtein、Shelley Sadin、Jim Shellenberger、Norm Silber、Jocelyn Simonson、Barbara Stark、Stewart Sterk、Victoria Szymczak、Janani Umamaheswar、Louis Virelli、Richard Wallsgrove和S.Lisa Washington。最后,我要感谢Kaylyn Fagan和Shannon Palm提供的宝贵研究帮助。所有的错误都是我自己的。ISSN 0041-915(印刷版)1942-8405(在线)*DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.907 httR://lawreviewlaw.pitt.edu U NIV E R S I T Y OF P IT T S B U R G H LAW R E V I E W
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Thin Blue Line Between Virtue and Vice: Confronting the Moral Harms of Policing
Scholarship on policing has exploded in recent years as bystanders increasingly record and circulate videos of police brutality, much of it directed at civilians of color. These incidents have drawn significant attention to the culture of police departments and police unions, generating widespread calls for the reform, or even the abolition, of police forces. The traditional considerations at the center of these debates include the practical challenges to enacting reforms, the expected efficacy of proposed changes for curtailing abuses, and the possible costs of these changes (whether measured in dollars or crime rates). The moral premises that are inherently embedded in reform arguments typically remain unstated and undefended, obscuring Associate Professor, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to present this project at an annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools and the University of Richmond School of Law Junior Faculty Forum, as well as to audiences at the Temple University Beasley School of Law, the William S. Richardson School f Law at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa, the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, and the Quinnipiac University School of Law. The paper benefitted from exchanges with Jon Abel, Alice Abreu, Scott Burris, Baruch Bush, Bill Chang, Robin Charlow, Erin Collins, Ron Colombo, Michelle Cosby, Randle DeFalco, Margaret deGuzman, Neal Feigenson, Brenner Fissell, Leslie Francis, Eric Freedman, Betsy Ginsberg, Lauryn Gouldin, Dan Greenwood, Paul Gugliuzza, Daniel Harawa, Ben Heath, Jen Herbst, Alex Klein, Stan Krauss, Guha Krishnamurthi, Julian Ku, Jamie Macleod, Jane Manners, Linda Meyer, Mark Niles, Alex Nunn, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Rachel Rebouch6, Alan Rozenshtein, Shelley Sadin, Jim Shellenberger, Norm Silber, Jocelyn Simonson, Barbara Stark, Stewart Sterk, Victoria Szymczak, Janani Umamaheswar, Louis Virelli, Richard Wallsgrove, and S. Lisa Washington. Finally, I am indebted to Kaylyn Fagan and Shannon Palm for their invaluable research assistance. All errors are my own. ISSN 0041-9915 (print) 1942-8405 (online) * DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.907 httR://lawreviewlaw.pitt.edu U NIV E R S I T Y OF P IT T S B U R G H LAW R E V I E W
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Law Review is a student-run journal of legal scholarship that publishes quarterly. Our goal is to contribute to the legal community by featuring pertinent articles that highlight current legal issues and changes in the law. The Law Review publishes articles, comments, book reviews, and notes on a wide variety of topics, including constitutional law, securities regulation, criminal procedure, family law, international law, and jurisprudence. The Law Review has also hosted several symposia, bringing scholars into one setting for lively debate and discussion of key legal topics.
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: The "Hard Problem" of U.S. Constitutional Law Criminal Justice Technology and the Regulatory Sandbox: Toward Balancing Justice, Accountability, and Innovation From Past to Present: Funding the Pennsylvania Public Education System The Federal Courts Are Not Bias Free Zones: An Argument for Eliminating Diversity Jurisdiction Urgenda vs. Juliana: Lessons for Future Climate Change Litigation Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1