地表臭氧概率预报的解释:以费城为例

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Forecasting Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1175/waf-d-22-0185.1
N. Balashov, A. Huff, A. Thompson
{"title":"地表臭氧概率预报的解释:以费城为例","authors":"N. Balashov, A. Huff, A. Thompson","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-22-0185.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe use of probabilistic forecasting has been growing in a variety of disciplines because of its potential to emphasize the degree of uncertainty inherent in a prediction. Interpretation of probabilistic forecasts, however, is oftentimes difficult deterring users who may benefit from such forecasts. To encourage broader use of probabilistic forecasts in the field of air quality, a process for interpreting forecasts from a statistical probabilistic air quality surface ozone model REGiS is demonstrated. Four procedures to convert probabilistic to deterministic forecasts are explored for Philadelphia metropolitan area. These procedures calibrate the predicted probability of daily maximum 8-hour average ozone exceeding a standard value by 1) estimating climatological relative frequency, 2) establishing a probability of an exceedance threshold as 50%, 3) maximizing the threat score, and 4) determining the unit bias ratio. REGiS is trained using 2000-2011 ozone season (May 1 to September 30) data, calibrated using 2012-2014 data, and evaluated using 2015-2018 data. Assessment of the calibration data with the Pierce Skill Score suggests an exceedance threshold based on climatological relative frequency for the conversion from probabilistic to deterministic forecasts. Calibrated REGiS generally compares well to predictions from the US national air quality model and operational ”expert” forecasts over the evaluation time period. For other probabilistic models and situations, different procedures of converting probabilistic to deterministic forecasts may be more beneficial. The methods presented in this paper represent an approach for operational air quality forecasters seeking to use probabilistic model output to support forecasts designed to protect public health.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation of Probabilistic Surface Ozone Forecasts: A Case Study for Philadelphia\",\"authors\":\"N. Balashov, A. Huff, A. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/waf-d-22-0185.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe use of probabilistic forecasting has been growing in a variety of disciplines because of its potential to emphasize the degree of uncertainty inherent in a prediction. Interpretation of probabilistic forecasts, however, is oftentimes difficult deterring users who may benefit from such forecasts. To encourage broader use of probabilistic forecasts in the field of air quality, a process for interpreting forecasts from a statistical probabilistic air quality surface ozone model REGiS is demonstrated. Four procedures to convert probabilistic to deterministic forecasts are explored for Philadelphia metropolitan area. These procedures calibrate the predicted probability of daily maximum 8-hour average ozone exceeding a standard value by 1) estimating climatological relative frequency, 2) establishing a probability of an exceedance threshold as 50%, 3) maximizing the threat score, and 4) determining the unit bias ratio. REGiS is trained using 2000-2011 ozone season (May 1 to September 30) data, calibrated using 2012-2014 data, and evaluated using 2015-2018 data. Assessment of the calibration data with the Pierce Skill Score suggests an exceedance threshold based on climatological relative frequency for the conversion from probabilistic to deterministic forecasts. Calibrated REGiS generally compares well to predictions from the US national air quality model and operational ”expert” forecasts over the evaluation time period. For other probabilistic models and situations, different procedures of converting probabilistic to deterministic forecasts may be more beneficial. The methods presented in this paper represent an approach for operational air quality forecasters seeking to use probabilistic model output to support forecasts designed to protect public health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-22-0185.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-22-0185.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概率预测由于其强调预测中固有的不确定性程度的潜力,在各种学科中得到越来越多的应用。然而,对概率预测的解释往往很难阻止可能从这种预测中受益的用户。为了鼓励在空气质量领域更广泛地使用概率预报,本文演示了从统计概率空气质量表面臭氧模式REGiS中解释预报的过程。探讨了费城市区将概率预报转化为确定性预报的四种方法。这些程序通过以下方法校准每日最大8小时平均臭氧超过标准值的预测概率:1)估计气候相对频率,2)建立超过阈值的概率为50%,3)最大化威胁得分,以及4)确定单位偏差比。REGiS使用2000-2011年臭氧季节(5月1日至9月30日)数据进行训练,使用2012-2014年数据进行校准,并使用2015-2018年数据进行评估。使用Pierce技能评分对校准数据进行评估,建议根据从概率预报到确定性预报转换的气候相对频率设置一个超越阈值。经过校准的REGiS通常与美国国家空气质量模型的预测和评估期间的业务“专家”预测相比较。对于其他概率模型和情况,将概率预测转换为确定性预测的不同程序可能更有益。本文提出的方法为业务空气质量预报员寻求使用概率模型输出来支持旨在保护公众健康的预报提供了一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpretation of Probabilistic Surface Ozone Forecasts: A Case Study for Philadelphia
The use of probabilistic forecasting has been growing in a variety of disciplines because of its potential to emphasize the degree of uncertainty inherent in a prediction. Interpretation of probabilistic forecasts, however, is oftentimes difficult deterring users who may benefit from such forecasts. To encourage broader use of probabilistic forecasts in the field of air quality, a process for interpreting forecasts from a statistical probabilistic air quality surface ozone model REGiS is demonstrated. Four procedures to convert probabilistic to deterministic forecasts are explored for Philadelphia metropolitan area. These procedures calibrate the predicted probability of daily maximum 8-hour average ozone exceeding a standard value by 1) estimating climatological relative frequency, 2) establishing a probability of an exceedance threshold as 50%, 3) maximizing the threat score, and 4) determining the unit bias ratio. REGiS is trained using 2000-2011 ozone season (May 1 to September 30) data, calibrated using 2012-2014 data, and evaluated using 2015-2018 data. Assessment of the calibration data with the Pierce Skill Score suggests an exceedance threshold based on climatological relative frequency for the conversion from probabilistic to deterministic forecasts. Calibrated REGiS generally compares well to predictions from the US national air quality model and operational ”expert” forecasts over the evaluation time period. For other probabilistic models and situations, different procedures of converting probabilistic to deterministic forecasts may be more beneficial. The methods presented in this paper represent an approach for operational air quality forecasters seeking to use probabilistic model output to support forecasts designed to protect public health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of sampling and storm-motion estimates on RUC/RAP-based discriminations of nontornadic and tornadic supercell environments Evaluating ensemble predictions of South Asian monsoon low pressure system genesis Evaluating machine learning-based probabilistic convective hazard forecasts using the HRRR: Quantifying hazard predictability and sensitivity to training choices AI-Driven Forecasting for Morning Fog Expansion (Sea of Clouds) The Meteorology of the August 2023 Maui Wildfire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1