虚构世界理论的问题化:纳博科夫小说中的全局逻辑不可能性

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS STYLE Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5325/style.56.3.0258
Mengchen Lang
{"title":"虚构世界理论的问题化:纳博科夫小说中的全局逻辑不可能性","authors":"Mengchen Lang","doi":"10.5325/style.56.3.0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Confronting fictional worlds theory with three novels by Vladimir Nabokov (The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, Pale Fire, and Look at the Harlequins!), the author argues that the theory is problematized by Nabokov's employment of global logical impossibilities. All three novels elicit fluid, fragmentary imaginations of \"fictional worlds\"; however, by requiring readers to juggle between several logically incompatible interpretations of characters and plots without reaching any synthesis, Nabokov refuses to let these imaginations of \"worlds\" solidify into fictional worlds in the theoretical sense. This obstruction of world-creation challenges the analytical power of fictional worlds theory and questions some of its basic assumptions. A further examination of three solutions that the theory proposes for logical impossibility shows that they fail to account for cases like Nabokov's without undermining the soundness or status of the theory itself. This problematization ultimately points to an alternative perception of fiction as a means of real-world communication.","PeriodicalId":45300,"journal":{"name":"STYLE","volume":"56 1","pages":"258 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fictional Worlds Theory Problematized: Global Logical Impossibilities in Vladimir Nabokov's Novels\",\"authors\":\"Mengchen Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/style.56.3.0258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Confronting fictional worlds theory with three novels by Vladimir Nabokov (The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, Pale Fire, and Look at the Harlequins!), the author argues that the theory is problematized by Nabokov's employment of global logical impossibilities. All three novels elicit fluid, fragmentary imaginations of \\\"fictional worlds\\\"; however, by requiring readers to juggle between several logically incompatible interpretations of characters and plots without reaching any synthesis, Nabokov refuses to let these imaginations of \\\"worlds\\\" solidify into fictional worlds in the theoretical sense. This obstruction of world-creation challenges the analytical power of fictional worlds theory and questions some of its basic assumptions. A further examination of three solutions that the theory proposes for logical impossibility shows that they fail to account for cases like Nabokov's without undermining the soundness or status of the theory itself. This problematization ultimately points to an alternative perception of fiction as a means of real-world communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STYLE\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"258 - 279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STYLE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.56.3.0258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STYLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.56.3.0258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者以纳博科夫的三部小说(《塞巴斯蒂安·奈特的真实生活》、《苍白的火》和《看看丑角》)作为对照,认为纳博科夫对全局逻辑不可能性的运用使虚构世界理论存在问题。这三部小说都引发了对“虚构世界”的流动的、零碎的想象;然而,纳博科夫要求读者在对人物和情节的几种逻辑上不相容的解释之间摇摆不定,而没有达到任何综合,从而拒绝让这些对“世界”的想象在理论意义上固化为虚构的世界。这种对世界创造的阻碍挑战了虚构世界理论的分析能力,并质疑了它的一些基本假设。对该理论为逻辑不可能性提出的三种解决方案的进一步检查表明,它们无法在不破坏理论本身的可靠性或地位的情况下解释像纳博科夫这样的情况。这种问题化最终指向了小说作为现实世界交流手段的另一种看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fictional Worlds Theory Problematized: Global Logical Impossibilities in Vladimir Nabokov's Novels
abstract:Confronting fictional worlds theory with three novels by Vladimir Nabokov (The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, Pale Fire, and Look at the Harlequins!), the author argues that the theory is problematized by Nabokov's employment of global logical impossibilities. All three novels elicit fluid, fragmentary imaginations of "fictional worlds"; however, by requiring readers to juggle between several logically incompatible interpretations of characters and plots without reaching any synthesis, Nabokov refuses to let these imaginations of "worlds" solidify into fictional worlds in the theoretical sense. This obstruction of world-creation challenges the analytical power of fictional worlds theory and questions some of its basic assumptions. A further examination of three solutions that the theory proposes for logical impossibility shows that they fail to account for cases like Nabokov's without undermining the soundness or status of the theory itself. This problematization ultimately points to an alternative perception of fiction as a means of real-world communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STYLE
STYLE Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.
期刊最新文献
Human Evolution and Fantastic Victorian Fiction Jackass, Ritual Clowning, and the Comic Themes of Universal Occurrence Mediating a Western Classic in China: Woodcuts, Iconic Narrative, and the 1903 Chinese Translation of J. D. Wyss’s The Swiss Family Robinson Ford Madox Ford Stylistics, Narratology, and Point of View: Partiality, Complementarity, and a New Definition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1