{"title":"本尼迪克特十六世:与文化对话的交际风格","authors":"Nicolás Massmann","doi":"10.1080/23753234.2023.2183226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few months after the resignation of Benedict XVI, a prestigious German cardinal and theologian wrote that this pontiff did not fit into any scheme (Kasper 2013, 490). With this he sought to underline something of the mystery of his person, but also the impossibility of interpreting and classifying him within the typical categories. However, this difficulty does not prevent us from glimpsing as a common thread of his pontificate some features with relatively clear outlines. One of them is to have elaborated a style of communicating the faith capable of reaching the heart and understanding of today’s man, while at the same time, presenting a message with sufficient intellectual credentials to enter into direct dialogue with contemporary culture. Understanding this communicative style implies first of all recognizing the fact that Benedict XVI never resigned from being a theologian. And it is precisely there, in his theological vision, that this style sinks its deepest roots. To be more precise, in the meaning that Ratzinger granted to the word as both the means chosen by God to communicate himself to man (revelation) and the most eminent mode of human communication (Benedict XVI 2008a). A word that, in order to be effective, must appeal to the moral conscience as well as to discursive reason and the affections of the heart. Benedict XVI trusted from the beginning of his pontificate in the silent power of the word (T€ uck 2013, 12), being aware that the echoes and fruits of it can come quite some time later. Although usually it did not take long to notice the positive effects. Good testimony to this positive effect includes the early fascination with which his speeches were received, the growing attendance at his catechetical sessions, the sales of his books and the spiritual nourishment many found in his homilies. This new style of discreet and sober communication definitely offers a certain novelty. Benedict XVI is clear that communicating does not consist only in transmitting wellarticulated ideas, following the rules of rhetoric or attending to the science of communication. This is where his theological vision comes into play once again: to communicate is to enter into communion (Scheffczyk 1966, 19). To communicate effectively, it is necessary to enter into the logic of personal encounter and to respect the dialogical dimension of the word. For Benedict XVI the communication of his message always meant a continuous communication of himself through his words, as Archbishop Gil Tamayo said in an interview (Latorre de Silva 2023). For only from love and friendship is authentic communication possible:","PeriodicalId":36858,"journal":{"name":"Church, Communication and Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benedict XVI: A communicative style in dialogue with culture\",\"authors\":\"Nicolás Massmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23753234.2023.2183226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A few months after the resignation of Benedict XVI, a prestigious German cardinal and theologian wrote that this pontiff did not fit into any scheme (Kasper 2013, 490). With this he sought to underline something of the mystery of his person, but also the impossibility of interpreting and classifying him within the typical categories. However, this difficulty does not prevent us from glimpsing as a common thread of his pontificate some features with relatively clear outlines. One of them is to have elaborated a style of communicating the faith capable of reaching the heart and understanding of today’s man, while at the same time, presenting a message with sufficient intellectual credentials to enter into direct dialogue with contemporary culture. Understanding this communicative style implies first of all recognizing the fact that Benedict XVI never resigned from being a theologian. And it is precisely there, in his theological vision, that this style sinks its deepest roots. To be more precise, in the meaning that Ratzinger granted to the word as both the means chosen by God to communicate himself to man (revelation) and the most eminent mode of human communication (Benedict XVI 2008a). A word that, in order to be effective, must appeal to the moral conscience as well as to discursive reason and the affections of the heart. Benedict XVI trusted from the beginning of his pontificate in the silent power of the word (T€ uck 2013, 12), being aware that the echoes and fruits of it can come quite some time later. Although usually it did not take long to notice the positive effects. Good testimony to this positive effect includes the early fascination with which his speeches were received, the growing attendance at his catechetical sessions, the sales of his books and the spiritual nourishment many found in his homilies. This new style of discreet and sober communication definitely offers a certain novelty. Benedict XVI is clear that communicating does not consist only in transmitting wellarticulated ideas, following the rules of rhetoric or attending to the science of communication. This is where his theological vision comes into play once again: to communicate is to enter into communion (Scheffczyk 1966, 19). To communicate effectively, it is necessary to enter into the logic of personal encounter and to respect the dialogical dimension of the word. For Benedict XVI the communication of his message always meant a continuous communication of himself through his words, as Archbishop Gil Tamayo said in an interview (Latorre de Silva 2023). For only from love and friendship is authentic communication possible:\",\"PeriodicalId\":36858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Church, Communication and Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Church, Communication and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2183226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2183226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本笃十六世辞职几个月后,一位著名的德国红衣主教和神学家写道,这位教皇不适合任何计划(Kasper 2013, 490)。他试图以此来强调他这个人的神秘之处,但也强调了在典型的类别中解释和分类他的不可能性。然而,这一困难并不妨碍我们从他的教宗任期的一个共同线索瞥见一些特征与相对清晰的轮廓。其中之一是精心设计了一种传达信仰的风格,能够触及现代人的心灵和理解,同时,呈现出一种具有足够智力证书的信息,可以与当代文化直接对话。理解这种沟通方式意味着首先要认识到本笃十六世从未放弃神学家的身份。正是在那里,在他的神学视野中,这种风格扎下了最深的根。更确切地说,在意义上,Ratzinger授予这个词作为上帝选择的手段来沟通自己给人(启示)和最杰出的人类交流模式(本笃十六世2008a)。这个词,为了有效,必须诉诸道德良知,以及话语理性和心灵的情感。本笃十六世从上任之初就相信圣言无声的力量(T€uck 2013, 12),他意识到圣言的回响和果实可能会在相当长的一段时间后才会出现。虽然通常用不了多久就能注意到积极的影响。这一积极影响的有力证据包括:早期他的演讲受到人们的热烈欢迎,他的教理问答课的出席人数不断增加,他的书的销量以及许多人从他的讲道中获得的精神滋养。这种谨慎而冷静的沟通方式无疑会带来某种新奇感。本笃十六世清楚地指出,沟通不只是传递清晰的思想,遵循修辞的规则或关注沟通的科学。这就是他的神学观点再次发挥作用的地方:沟通就是进入共融(Scheffczyk 1966,19)。为了有效地沟通,必须进入个人相遇的逻辑,并尊重话语的对话维度。对于本笃十六世来说,传达他的信息总是意味着通过他的话语不断地传达他自己,正如吉尔·塔马约大主教在一次采访中所说(Latorre de Silva 2023)。因为只有爱和友谊才是真正的交流;
Benedict XVI: A communicative style in dialogue with culture
A few months after the resignation of Benedict XVI, a prestigious German cardinal and theologian wrote that this pontiff did not fit into any scheme (Kasper 2013, 490). With this he sought to underline something of the mystery of his person, but also the impossibility of interpreting and classifying him within the typical categories. However, this difficulty does not prevent us from glimpsing as a common thread of his pontificate some features with relatively clear outlines. One of them is to have elaborated a style of communicating the faith capable of reaching the heart and understanding of today’s man, while at the same time, presenting a message with sufficient intellectual credentials to enter into direct dialogue with contemporary culture. Understanding this communicative style implies first of all recognizing the fact that Benedict XVI never resigned from being a theologian. And it is precisely there, in his theological vision, that this style sinks its deepest roots. To be more precise, in the meaning that Ratzinger granted to the word as both the means chosen by God to communicate himself to man (revelation) and the most eminent mode of human communication (Benedict XVI 2008a). A word that, in order to be effective, must appeal to the moral conscience as well as to discursive reason and the affections of the heart. Benedict XVI trusted from the beginning of his pontificate in the silent power of the word (T€ uck 2013, 12), being aware that the echoes and fruits of it can come quite some time later. Although usually it did not take long to notice the positive effects. Good testimony to this positive effect includes the early fascination with which his speeches were received, the growing attendance at his catechetical sessions, the sales of his books and the spiritual nourishment many found in his homilies. This new style of discreet and sober communication definitely offers a certain novelty. Benedict XVI is clear that communicating does not consist only in transmitting wellarticulated ideas, following the rules of rhetoric or attending to the science of communication. This is where his theological vision comes into play once again: to communicate is to enter into communion (Scheffczyk 1966, 19). To communicate effectively, it is necessary to enter into the logic of personal encounter and to respect the dialogical dimension of the word. For Benedict XVI the communication of his message always meant a continuous communication of himself through his words, as Archbishop Gil Tamayo said in an interview (Latorre de Silva 2023). For only from love and friendship is authentic communication possible: