CBQ CLASSICSVintage作品至今仍有意义

Q4 Social Sciences Communication Booknotes Quarterly Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347
C. Sterling, Albert R. Abramson
{"title":"CBQ CLASSICSVintage作品至今仍有意义","authors":"C. Sterling, Albert R. Abramson","doi":"10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What books (if any) does a longtime reviewer and collector retain upon retirement? That quandary faced me a couple of years ago as I began to cull a large media and telecommunications collection built over 45 years of editing CBQ and its predecessors. Given that total elimination wasn’t a viable option for my peace of mind, I needed to make some difficult choices: Which books to retain? Which to go along with me to that legendary “desert island” called retirement? Every title discussed in this three-part essay series survived the cut before I donated the larger part of the library to two specialized institutional collections. So, why these particular “keepers”? Overall, these are among the best researched works that are likely to hold their substantive value over time. There’s an emphasis on technological development and its social and economic impact—and a strong American bias because that’s the milieu I know best. And some books simply were (and remain) enjoyable reads that I may return to. There are several limitations to this selection other than those primary biases. With but two partial exceptions (multivolume sets by Barnouw and Briggs described next) all were published in the half-century since Booknotes began in 1969. Only English language books are included. All are monographs—despite many good ones, no edited anthologies are included. The subject focus is admittedly fairly narrow: there are, for example, no general mass communications or journalism (a massive literature in itself), very little on programming, and no histories of computers (despite many good ones) and their ubiquitous impacts. This first portion of a review essay (that will appear here and in the next two issues) focuses on broadcasting both here and in Britain. Part 2 (next issue) will review American and international telecommunications, while Part 3 will assess some of the best relevant biographies. Finally, all of what follows is based on the opinions of but one reader...","PeriodicalId":38174,"journal":{"name":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","volume":"50 1","pages":"72 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CBQ CLASSICSVintage Works Still Relevant Today\",\"authors\":\"C. Sterling, Albert R. Abramson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What books (if any) does a longtime reviewer and collector retain upon retirement? That quandary faced me a couple of years ago as I began to cull a large media and telecommunications collection built over 45 years of editing CBQ and its predecessors. Given that total elimination wasn’t a viable option for my peace of mind, I needed to make some difficult choices: Which books to retain? Which to go along with me to that legendary “desert island” called retirement? Every title discussed in this three-part essay series survived the cut before I donated the larger part of the library to two specialized institutional collections. So, why these particular “keepers”? Overall, these are among the best researched works that are likely to hold their substantive value over time. There’s an emphasis on technological development and its social and economic impact—and a strong American bias because that’s the milieu I know best. And some books simply were (and remain) enjoyable reads that I may return to. There are several limitations to this selection other than those primary biases. With but two partial exceptions (multivolume sets by Barnouw and Briggs described next) all were published in the half-century since Booknotes began in 1969. Only English language books are included. All are monographs—despite many good ones, no edited anthologies are included. The subject focus is admittedly fairly narrow: there are, for example, no general mass communications or journalism (a massive literature in itself), very little on programming, and no histories of computers (despite many good ones) and their ubiquitous impacts. This first portion of a review essay (that will appear here and in the next two issues) focuses on broadcasting both here and in Britain. Part 2 (next issue) will review American and international telecommunications, while Part 3 will assess some of the best relevant biographies. Finally, all of what follows is based on the opinions of but one reader...\",\"PeriodicalId\":38174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Booknotes Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Booknotes Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10948007.2019.1615347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个长期的评论家和收藏家在退休后会保留哪些书(如果有的话)?几年前,当我开始挑选一个庞大的媒体和电信收藏时,我遇到了这种困境,这些收藏是我在编辑《CBQ》及其前身的45年中积累起来的。考虑到要想让我的心灵平静,完全删除书籍并不是一个可行的选择,我需要做出一些艰难的选择:哪些书该保留?哪一个跟我一起去那个传说中的“荒岛”退休?在我把图书馆的大部分藏书捐赠给两个专门的机构收藏之前,这个由三部分组成的系列文章中讨论的每一本书都经受住了考验。那么,为什么会有这些“守护者”呢?总的来说,这些都是最好的研究作品,可能会随着时间的推移而保持其实质性价值。它强调技术发展及其对社会和经济的影响——这是一种强烈的美国偏见,因为这是我最了解的环境。有些书曾经是(现在仍然是)令人愉快的读物,我可能会再次阅读。除了这些主要偏见之外,这种选择还有一些限制。除了两个部分的例外(巴诺和布里格斯的多卷集),所有的书都是在Booknotes于1969年问世后的半个世纪里出版的。只包括英语书。所有这些都是专著——尽管有很多好作品,但没有编辑过的选集。无可否认,该课程的主题范围相当狭窄:例如,没有一般的大众传播或新闻(本身就是大量的文学作品),很少有关于编程的内容,没有计算机历史(尽管有许多优秀的历史)及其无处不在的影响。这是一篇评论文章的第一部分(将在这里和接下来的两期中出现),重点关注这里和英国的广播。第2部分(下期)将回顾美国和国际电信,而第3部分将评估一些最好的相关传记。最后,下面的所有内容都是基于一个读者的观点……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CBQ CLASSICSVintage Works Still Relevant Today
What books (if any) does a longtime reviewer and collector retain upon retirement? That quandary faced me a couple of years ago as I began to cull a large media and telecommunications collection built over 45 years of editing CBQ and its predecessors. Given that total elimination wasn’t a viable option for my peace of mind, I needed to make some difficult choices: Which books to retain? Which to go along with me to that legendary “desert island” called retirement? Every title discussed in this three-part essay series survived the cut before I donated the larger part of the library to two specialized institutional collections. So, why these particular “keepers”? Overall, these are among the best researched works that are likely to hold their substantive value over time. There’s an emphasis on technological development and its social and economic impact—and a strong American bias because that’s the milieu I know best. And some books simply were (and remain) enjoyable reads that I may return to. There are several limitations to this selection other than those primary biases. With but two partial exceptions (multivolume sets by Barnouw and Briggs described next) all were published in the half-century since Booknotes began in 1969. Only English language books are included. All are monographs—despite many good ones, no edited anthologies are included. The subject focus is admittedly fairly narrow: there are, for example, no general mass communications or journalism (a massive literature in itself), very little on programming, and no histories of computers (despite many good ones) and their ubiquitous impacts. This first portion of a review essay (that will appear here and in the next two issues) focuses on broadcasting both here and in Britain. Part 2 (next issue) will review American and international telecommunications, while Part 3 will assess some of the best relevant biographies. Finally, all of what follows is based on the opinions of but one reader...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Booknotes Quarterly
Communication Booknotes Quarterly Social Sciences-Communication
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Author Index for Volume 52: 2021 Looking Back (and Forward): Some COVID-19 Pandemic After-Effects on Books and Publishing Changing Horizons for CBQ Title Index for Volume 52: 2021 CBQ BOOKNOTES Condensed Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1