管理咨询获取知识:民族文化视角

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management & Organization Pub Date : 2021-08-16 DOI:10.1017/jmo.2021.46
J. O’Mahoney, Andrew Sturdy, A. Galazka
{"title":"管理咨询获取知识:民族文化视角","authors":"J. O’Mahoney, Andrew Sturdy, A. Galazka","doi":"10.1017/jmo.2021.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines how national culture informs the sourcing of management knowledge through external consultancy. First, it hypothesises and compares the relationship between quantitative measures of Hofstede's cultural indices with adjusted expenditure on consulting in nine countries. Two cultural indices are found to correlate with consulting use – power distance (negatively) and individualism (positively). However, the disparity between our findings and prior research suggests limitations of generalisation in studies solely employing quantitative cultural indices to understand the purchasing of business knowledge. We therefore propose the use of supplementary, qualitative data with sensitivity to local contexts and briefly apply this by using secondary sources to provide historical narratives for two countries – the UK and Japan. Overall, we find and tentatively explain significant statistical relationships between Hofstede's cultural indices and adjusted expenditure on consultancy. We then draw attention to wider implications for consulting research and for practitioners involved in this context.","PeriodicalId":47612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acquiring knowledge through management consultancy: a national culture perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. O’Mahoney, Andrew Sturdy, A. Galazka\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jmo.2021.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper examines how national culture informs the sourcing of management knowledge through external consultancy. First, it hypothesises and compares the relationship between quantitative measures of Hofstede's cultural indices with adjusted expenditure on consulting in nine countries. Two cultural indices are found to correlate with consulting use – power distance (negatively) and individualism (positively). However, the disparity between our findings and prior research suggests limitations of generalisation in studies solely employing quantitative cultural indices to understand the purchasing of business knowledge. We therefore propose the use of supplementary, qualitative data with sensitivity to local contexts and briefly apply this by using secondary sources to provide historical narratives for two countries – the UK and Japan. Overall, we find and tentatively explain significant statistical relationships between Hofstede's cultural indices and adjusted expenditure on consultancy. We then draw attention to wider implications for consulting research and for practitioners involved in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.46\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.46","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了民族文化如何通过外部咨询告知管理知识的来源。首先,本文假设并比较了Hofstede文化指数的定量测量与9个国家调整后的咨询支出之间的关系。发现两个文化指标与咨询使用权力距离(负向)和个人主义(正向)相关。然而,我们的研究结果与先前研究之间的差异表明,仅使用定量文化指数来理解商业知识购买的研究泛化的局限性。因此,我们建议使用对当地背景敏感的补充定性数据,并通过使用二手资料简要地应用这一点,为两个国家-英国和日本提供历史叙述。总体而言,我们发现并初步解释了Hofstede文化指数与调整后的咨询支出之间的显著统计关系。然后,我们提请注意更广泛的影响咨询研究和从业人员参与这方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acquiring knowledge through management consultancy: a national culture perspective
This paper examines how national culture informs the sourcing of management knowledge through external consultancy. First, it hypothesises and compares the relationship between quantitative measures of Hofstede's cultural indices with adjusted expenditure on consulting in nine countries. Two cultural indices are found to correlate with consulting use – power distance (negatively) and individualism (positively). However, the disparity between our findings and prior research suggests limitations of generalisation in studies solely employing quantitative cultural indices to understand the purchasing of business knowledge. We therefore propose the use of supplementary, qualitative data with sensitivity to local contexts and briefly apply this by using secondary sources to provide historical narratives for two countries – the UK and Japan. Overall, we find and tentatively explain significant statistical relationships between Hofstede's cultural indices and adjusted expenditure on consultancy. We then draw attention to wider implications for consulting research and for practitioners involved in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management & Organization is an international peer-reviewed journal from eContent, in association with ANZAM. It provides global perspectives on management and organization of benefit to scholars, educators, students, practitioners, policy-makers and consultants worldwide. In one forum, Journal of Management & Organization covers: •Qualitative and quantitative empirical research articles •Theoretical and conceptual articles •Literature reviews - including those from theses •Articles on management education and learning •Practitioner perspectives and case studies •Methodological advances - including those from theses
期刊最新文献
Applying a person-oriented approach to workplace aggression: Implications for employee emotional well-being Psychological need satisfaction, frustration, and unfulfillment profiles in the workplace: Their nature, predictors, and outcomes Communicate or not: Exploring the different effects of instrumental and expressive networks on thriving at work Firm performance feedback and organizational impression management: The moderating role of CEO overconfidence Escaping the organization: Examining the influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality on employee withdrawal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1