作为宪法事件和管辖权遭遇的节日:殖民地维多利亚和黑人研究员独立骑士团

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2021.2016047
S. Chalmers
{"title":"作为宪法事件和管辖权遭遇的节日:殖民地维多利亚和黑人研究员独立骑士团","authors":"S. Chalmers","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2021.2016047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The year 2020 marked the first meeting between an Australian government – the Government of Victoria – and First Nations in a treaty-making process. Given the importance of this, it is timely to recall a moment when another opportunity to meet was missed. That moment was a foundational one for the nascent colonial state: a public festival held in 1850 to celebrate the inauguration of the Colony of Victoria. There are two aspects to this festival that are of interest here. The first is how it was a ‘constitutional’ event involving an act of jurisdiction that gave shape to the lawful authority of the colonists, to the legal subjectivity of Aboriginal peoples, and to legal relations between the Colony and First Nations. The second aspect, implicit in the first, is how the festival was also an ‘international’ meeting, which the colonists failed to attend. As the article shows, these two aspects – the festival as constitutional event and as jurisdictional encounter – are inseparable, the success of the former being integral to the failure of the latter. And it is this failure that the colonial state must still contend with as it begins treaty negotiations almost two centuries later.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The festival as constitutional event and as jurisdictional encounter: colonial Victoria and the Independent Order of Black Fellows\",\"authors\":\"S. Chalmers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10383441.2021.2016047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The year 2020 marked the first meeting between an Australian government – the Government of Victoria – and First Nations in a treaty-making process. Given the importance of this, it is timely to recall a moment when another opportunity to meet was missed. That moment was a foundational one for the nascent colonial state: a public festival held in 1850 to celebrate the inauguration of the Colony of Victoria. There are two aspects to this festival that are of interest here. The first is how it was a ‘constitutional’ event involving an act of jurisdiction that gave shape to the lawful authority of the colonists, to the legal subjectivity of Aboriginal peoples, and to legal relations between the Colony and First Nations. The second aspect, implicit in the first, is how the festival was also an ‘international’ meeting, which the colonists failed to attend. As the article shows, these two aspects – the festival as constitutional event and as jurisdictional encounter – are inseparable, the success of the former being integral to the failure of the latter. And it is this failure that the colonial state must still contend with as it begins treaty negotiations almost two centuries later.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Griffith Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.2016047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.2016047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年标志着澳大利亚政府-维多利亚州政府-与原住民在条约制定过程中的第一次会议。鉴于这一点的重要性,我们有必要回顾一下错失另一个会晤机会的时刻。那一刻对这个新生的殖民国家来说是一个奠基的时刻:1850年举行了一个公共节日,庆祝维多利亚殖民地的就职典礼。这个节日有两个方面值得关注。首先,这是一个涉及司法行为的“宪法”事件,它塑造了殖民者的合法权威,原住民的法律主体性,以及殖民地和第一民族之间的法律关系。第二个方面隐含在第一个方面,就是这个节日也是一个“国际”会议,而殖民者没有参加。正如文章所示,这两个方面——作为宪法事件的节日和作为司法遭遇的节日——是不可分割的,前者的成功与后者的失败密不可分。近两个世纪后,当这个殖民国家开始条约谈判时,它仍然必须与这种失败作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The festival as constitutional event and as jurisdictional encounter: colonial Victoria and the Independent Order of Black Fellows
ABSTRACT The year 2020 marked the first meeting between an Australian government – the Government of Victoria – and First Nations in a treaty-making process. Given the importance of this, it is timely to recall a moment when another opportunity to meet was missed. That moment was a foundational one for the nascent colonial state: a public festival held in 1850 to celebrate the inauguration of the Colony of Victoria. There are two aspects to this festival that are of interest here. The first is how it was a ‘constitutional’ event involving an act of jurisdiction that gave shape to the lawful authority of the colonists, to the legal subjectivity of Aboriginal peoples, and to legal relations between the Colony and First Nations. The second aspect, implicit in the first, is how the festival was also an ‘international’ meeting, which the colonists failed to attend. As the article shows, these two aspects – the festival as constitutional event and as jurisdictional encounter – are inseparable, the success of the former being integral to the failure of the latter. And it is this failure that the colonial state must still contend with as it begins treaty negotiations almost two centuries later.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising the crimes of Big Tech The current legal regime of the Indonesian outer small islands Mainstreaming climate change in legal education Skeletons in the cupboard: reading settler anxiety in Mabo and Love Post-enlargement (free) movement in the EU: who really counts as EU CITIZEN? understanding Dano through the lens of Orientalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1