支持自己或支持爱人的不同干预目标对使用心理治疗的意向与数字心理健康的影响:一项随机试点研究

Amit Baumel, Shir Tamir
{"title":"支持自己或支持爱人的不同干预目标对使用心理治疗的意向与数字心理健康的影响:一项随机试点研究","authors":"Amit Baumel, Shir Tamir","doi":"10.1080/15228835.2022.2036300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Even though e-mental health services have the potential to increase reach to evidence based care, the public has tended to view them less favorably than in-person therapy. This study examined whether individual intentions for using psychotherapy are influenced by the service’s target—supporting oneself or supporting a loved-one. The sample consisted of 78 parents who were randomized to one of these two conditions: reading descriptions of interventions aimed at treating their own anxiety disorder (self-condition) or at helping them treat their child’s anxiety (loved-one condition). In both conditions, we compared parent intentions to receive treatment through in-person and unguided digital intervention mediums. Parents in the loved-one condition with no previous experience of psychotherapy showed no significant differences in their intentions to use the two intervention mediums. However, in all other study conditions, participants’ intentions favored in-person therapy as the intervention medium. Thematic analysis suggests that participants’ preference for unguided interventions when the focus was on supporting a loved one revolved around the perceived lack of need for an interpersonal therapeutic relationship for this intervention’s target. Our results imply that technology may have an advantage when used to train people to support their loved-ones’ mental health.","PeriodicalId":46115,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","volume":"40 1","pages":"278 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Intervention Targets of Supporting Oneself or Supporting A Loved-One Impact Intention to Use Psychotherapy Versus Digital Mental Health: A Randomized Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Amit Baumel, Shir Tamir\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228835.2022.2036300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Even though e-mental health services have the potential to increase reach to evidence based care, the public has tended to view them less favorably than in-person therapy. This study examined whether individual intentions for using psychotherapy are influenced by the service’s target—supporting oneself or supporting a loved-one. The sample consisted of 78 parents who were randomized to one of these two conditions: reading descriptions of interventions aimed at treating their own anxiety disorder (self-condition) or at helping them treat their child’s anxiety (loved-one condition). In both conditions, we compared parent intentions to receive treatment through in-person and unguided digital intervention mediums. Parents in the loved-one condition with no previous experience of psychotherapy showed no significant differences in their intentions to use the two intervention mediums. However, in all other study conditions, participants’ intentions favored in-person therapy as the intervention medium. Thematic analysis suggests that participants’ preference for unguided interventions when the focus was on supporting a loved one revolved around the perceived lack of need for an interpersonal therapeutic relationship for this intervention’s target. Our results imply that technology may have an advantage when used to train people to support their loved-ones’ mental health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"278 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2022.2036300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2022.2036300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管电子心理健康服务有可能增加循证护理的覆盖面,但公众倾向于认为它们不如面对面的治疗更有利。本研究考察了个人使用心理治疗的意向是否受到服务目标的影响——支持自己或支持所爱的人。样本由78名父母组成,他们被随机分为两组:阅读旨在治疗他们自己的焦虑障碍(自我状况)的干预措施的描述,或帮助他们治疗孩子的焦虑(爱人状况)。在这两种情况下,我们比较了父母通过面对面和无指导的数字干预媒介接受治疗的意愿。没有心理治疗经验的父母在使用两种干预媒介的意图上没有显着差异。然而,在所有其他研究条件下,参与者倾向于亲自治疗作为干预媒介。主题分析表明,当重点是支持所爱的人时,参与者对无指导干预的偏好围绕着对这种干预目标缺乏人际治疗关系的感知。我们的研究结果表明,当技术被用来训练人们支持他们所爱的人的心理健康时,可能会有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Different Intervention Targets of Supporting Oneself or Supporting A Loved-One Impact Intention to Use Psychotherapy Versus Digital Mental Health: A Randomized Pilot Study
Abstract Even though e-mental health services have the potential to increase reach to evidence based care, the public has tended to view them less favorably than in-person therapy. This study examined whether individual intentions for using psychotherapy are influenced by the service’s target—supporting oneself or supporting a loved-one. The sample consisted of 78 parents who were randomized to one of these two conditions: reading descriptions of interventions aimed at treating their own anxiety disorder (self-condition) or at helping them treat their child’s anxiety (loved-one condition). In both conditions, we compared parent intentions to receive treatment through in-person and unguided digital intervention mediums. Parents in the loved-one condition with no previous experience of psychotherapy showed no significant differences in their intentions to use the two intervention mediums. However, in all other study conditions, participants’ intentions favored in-person therapy as the intervention medium. Thematic analysis suggests that participants’ preference for unguided interventions when the focus was on supporting a loved one revolved around the perceived lack of need for an interpersonal therapeutic relationship for this intervention’s target. Our results imply that technology may have an advantage when used to train people to support their loved-ones’ mental health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed, refereed journal explores the potentials of computer and telecommunications technologies in mental health, developmental disability, welfare, addictions, education, and other human services. The Journal of Technology in Human Services covers the full range of technological applications, including direct service techniques. It not only provides the necessary historical perspectives on the use of computers in the human service field, but it also presents articles that will improve your technology literacy and keep you abreast of state-of-the-art developments.
期刊最新文献
Development of the Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS), a Personalized Smartphone App for Suicide Prevention: Feedback from Individual Interviews Online Employment Services for Immigrant Professionals: An Environmental Scan Experiences of Older Adult Volunteers and Nursing Simulation Coordinators in a Graduate-Level Primary Care Telehealth Simulation: Benefits, Facilitators, and Volunteer Management Considerations The Use of Online Medical Record Functionalities in Older Adulthood: The Role of Use Encouragement and Access Frequency An Information Acquisition Approach on How Young Adults Search for Mental Health Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1