{"title":"\"实际给出\"和\"以给定的形式呈现\" \"实际是新的\"和\"以新的形式呈现\"","authors":"Margaret Berry","doi":"10.1075/etc.00041.ber","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper considers the relevance of various approaches to the study of ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to a number of\n practical problems: complaints from listeners to UK radio programmes that presenters place emphasis on the wrong words;\n inaudibility of openings of utterances in radio news bulletins; and ambiguity of pronouns. Approaches to ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to be\n discussed include those whose concerns are with intonation (e.g., Halliday & Matthiessen\n 2014), those who pay attention to definiteness/indefiniteness in the nominal group (e.g., Martin 1992), and those who are more concerned with what is in the minds of hearers and readers (e.g.,\n Prince 1981; Lambrecht 1994). The\n underlying questions that are being investigated are: How free are speakers and writers to assign ‘Given’ or ‘New’ status to\n entities? Are there constraints on what they can do intonationally, or with definiteness, or with pronouns?","PeriodicalId":42970,"journal":{"name":"English Text Construction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Actually given’ versus ‘presented as given’ and ‘actually new’ versus ‘presented as new’\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/etc.00041.ber\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper considers the relevance of various approaches to the study of ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to a number of\\n practical problems: complaints from listeners to UK radio programmes that presenters place emphasis on the wrong words;\\n inaudibility of openings of utterances in radio news bulletins; and ambiguity of pronouns. Approaches to ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to be\\n discussed include those whose concerns are with intonation (e.g., Halliday & Matthiessen\\n 2014), those who pay attention to definiteness/indefiniteness in the nominal group (e.g., Martin 1992), and those who are more concerned with what is in the minds of hearers and readers (e.g.,\\n Prince 1981; Lambrecht 1994). The\\n underlying questions that are being investigated are: How free are speakers and writers to assign ‘Given’ or ‘New’ status to\\n entities? Are there constraints on what they can do intonationally, or with definiteness, or with pronouns?\",\"PeriodicalId\":42970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Text Construction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Text Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00041.ber\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Text Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00041.ber","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘Actually given’ versus ‘presented as given’ and ‘actually new’ versus ‘presented as new’
This paper considers the relevance of various approaches to the study of ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to a number of
practical problems: complaints from listeners to UK radio programmes that presenters place emphasis on the wrong words;
inaudibility of openings of utterances in radio news bulletins; and ambiguity of pronouns. Approaches to ‘Given’ and ‘New’ to be
discussed include those whose concerns are with intonation (e.g., Halliday & Matthiessen
2014), those who pay attention to definiteness/indefiniteness in the nominal group (e.g., Martin 1992), and those who are more concerned with what is in the minds of hearers and readers (e.g.,
Prince 1981; Lambrecht 1994). The
underlying questions that are being investigated are: How free are speakers and writers to assign ‘Given’ or ‘New’ status to
entities? Are there constraints on what they can do intonationally, or with definiteness, or with pronouns?