话语中的记忆:接近德国大屠杀和后殖民记忆的冲突星座

Liane Schäfer
{"title":"话语中的记忆:接近德国大屠杀和后殖民记忆的冲突星座","authors":"Liane Schäfer","doi":"10.14712/23363231.2021.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s Germany, the memory of the Holocaust has become institutionalized. However, its institutionalization should not be mistaken for stability. In fact, Holocaust memory has been and still is questioned and contested. At the same time, a global phenomenon, postcolonial memo- ry, is receiving increased attention in Germany. As postcolonial memory is better understood, new questions are arising about Germany’s memory culture in the twenty-first century. Precisely because of Germany’s experience with National Socialism, the memory of colonialism exists in a memory space that is heavily influenced by discussions of the Holocaust. The memories of the two phenomena appear in constellations that conflict with each other. In this paper, I address the two conflicting constellations of Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and propose a discursive perspective on Germany’s memory culture. Analyzing a national memory culture as a creation of discourse provides an opportunity to resolve the argumentative standoff between Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and instead put German memory culture itself at the center of criticism.","PeriodicalId":33551,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory in Discourse: Approaching Conflicting Constellations of Holocaust and Postcolonial Memory in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Liane Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23363231.2021.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today’s Germany, the memory of the Holocaust has become institutionalized. However, its institutionalization should not be mistaken for stability. In fact, Holocaust memory has been and still is questioned and contested. At the same time, a global phenomenon, postcolonial memo- ry, is receiving increased attention in Germany. As postcolonial memory is better understood, new questions are arising about Germany’s memory culture in the twenty-first century. Precisely because of Germany’s experience with National Socialism, the memory of colonialism exists in a memory space that is heavily influenced by discussions of the Holocaust. The memories of the two phenomena appear in constellations that conflict with each other. In this paper, I address the two conflicting constellations of Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and propose a discursive perspective on Germany’s memory culture. Analyzing a national memory culture as a creation of discourse provides an opportunity to resolve the argumentative standoff between Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and instead put German memory culture itself at the center of criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2021.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2021.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在今天的德国,对大屠杀的记忆已经制度化。然而,它的制度化不应被误认为是稳定。事实上,大屠杀记忆一直受到质疑和质疑。与此同时,一种全球现象——后殖民备忘录——在德国受到越来越多的关注。随着后殖民记忆被更好地理解,关于21世纪德国记忆文化的新问题也出现了。正是由于德国在国家社会主义方面的经历,殖民主义的记忆存在于一个深受大屠杀讨论影响的记忆空间中。这两种现象的记忆出现在相互冲突的星座中。在本文中,我解决了大屠杀记忆和后殖民记忆这两个相互冲突的星座,并提出了一个关于德国记忆文化的话语视角。将一个国家的记忆文化作为一种话语创造来分析,为解决大屠杀记忆和后殖民记忆之间的争论僵局提供了一个机会,并将德国的记忆文化本身置于批评的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Memory in Discourse: Approaching Conflicting Constellations of Holocaust and Postcolonial Memory in Germany
In today’s Germany, the memory of the Holocaust has become institutionalized. However, its institutionalization should not be mistaken for stability. In fact, Holocaust memory has been and still is questioned and contested. At the same time, a global phenomenon, postcolonial memo- ry, is receiving increased attention in Germany. As postcolonial memory is better understood, new questions are arising about Germany’s memory culture in the twenty-first century. Precisely because of Germany’s experience with National Socialism, the memory of colonialism exists in a memory space that is heavily influenced by discussions of the Holocaust. The memories of the two phenomena appear in constellations that conflict with each other. In this paper, I address the two conflicting constellations of Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and propose a discursive perspective on Germany’s memory culture. Analyzing a national memory culture as a creation of discourse provides an opportunity to resolve the argumentative standoff between Holocaust memory and postcolonial memory, and instead put German memory culture itself at the center of criticism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ukraine in a Changing Europe: A New Research Centre at Charles University’s Institute of International Studies Violence as a “Generational Experience” of Growing Up in Post-Wall East Germany? Female Experiences of Racist Othering and Assault in East Germany 1989–2000 M. E. Sarotte, Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate Giving a Voice to the Silenced Women of Francoist Spain Taking Women Seriously: A Feminist Approach to the Study of Colonial Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1