{"title":"可赎回免税债券成本太高","authors":"A. Kalotay","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.","PeriodicalId":53711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fixed Income","volume":"32 1","pages":"77 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Callable Tax-Exempt Bonds Are Too Costly\",\"authors\":\"A. Kalotay\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fixed Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fixed Income (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABSs and MBSs, and structured products like CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analysis on fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. JFI keeps you on the front line of fixed income practices by: •Staying current on the cutting edge of fixed income markets •Managing your bond portfolios more efficiently •Evaluating interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk •Gaining insights into the risk profile of structured products.