可赎回免税债券成本太高

A. Kalotay
{"title":"可赎回免税债券成本太高","authors":"A. Kalotay","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.","PeriodicalId":53711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fixed Income","volume":"32 1","pages":"77 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Callable Tax-Exempt Bonds Are Too Costly\",\"authors\":\"A. Kalotay\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fixed Income\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fixed Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2022.1.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实上,每一种长期免税的市政债券都是可赎回的,通常在发行10年后按面值发行。借款人用高于市场的优惠券或接受较低的销售价格来支付看涨期权。我们探讨了期权的价值与其成本的比较。价格合理的看涨期权对市政当局来说是一笔不错的交易吗?值得注意的发现是,看涨期权是不可取的,因为它的成本超过了预期收益。市政借款人不应该以更低的价格或更高的息票发行可赎回债券,而应该发行无选择权债券。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Callable Tax-Exempt Bonds Are Too Costly
Virtually every longer-term tax-exempt municipal bond is callable, usually at par 10 years after issuance. Borrowers pay for the call option with an above-market coupon or by accepting a lower sale price. We explore how the value of the option compares to its cost. Is a fairly priced call option a good deal for the municipality? The remarkable finding is that the call option is undesirable, because its cost exceeds its expected benefit. Instead of issuing callable bonds at lower prices or with higher coupons, municipal borrowers should issue optionless bonds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fixed Income
Journal of Fixed Income Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fixed Income (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABSs and MBSs, and structured products like CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analysis on fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. JFI keeps you on the front line of fixed income practices by: •Staying current on the cutting edge of fixed income markets •Managing your bond portfolios more efficiently •Evaluating interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk •Gaining insights into the risk profile of structured products.
期刊最新文献
How Making Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities Portable May Impact Housing and Mortgage-Backed Securities Investors Gradient Boosting Model for Corporate Default Integrating Multiple Signals in Systematic Corporate Bond Selection Strategies Bond Duration and Convexity under Stochastic Interest Rates and Credit Spreads Is Bloomberg’s Credit Default Swaps Model Superior in Predicting Defaults?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1