电动固定翼无人飞行器系统(UAS)的磁干扰测试方法

IF 1.3 Q3 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Pub Date : 2018-07-30 DOI:10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006
L. Tuck, C. Samson, J. Laliberté, M. Wells, F. Belanger
{"title":"电动固定翼无人飞行器系统(UAS)的磁干扰测试方法","authors":"L. Tuck, C. Samson, J. Laliberté, M. Wells, F. Belanger","doi":"10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the barriers preventing unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) from having a larger presence in the geophysical magnetic surveying industry is the magnetic interference generated by the UAS and its impact on the quality of the recorded data. Detailed characterization of interference effects is therefore needed before remedial solutions can be proposed. A method for characterizing magnetic interference is demonstrated for a 21 kg, 3.7 m wingspan, 6 kW electric fixed-wing UAS purposely built for magnetic surveying. It involves mapping the spatial variations of the total magnetic intensity resulting from the interference sources on the UAS. Dynamic tests showed that the motor should be engaged and the aircraft control surfaces levelled prior to mapping. Experimental results reveal that the two strongest sources of magnetic interference are the cables connecting the motor to the batteries, and the servos. Combining three factors to assess the level of magnetic interference — the total magnetic intensity, 4th difference and vertical magnetic gradient — an index overlay shows that the magnetic sensor(s) should be located at least 50 cm away from the wingtips or tail to ensure an interference level of <2 nT, a 4th difference of <0.05 nT, and a gradient of <10 nT/m.","PeriodicalId":45619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic interference testing method for an electric fixed-wing unmanned aircraft system (UAS)\",\"authors\":\"L. Tuck, C. Samson, J. Laliberté, M. Wells, F. Belanger\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the barriers preventing unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) from having a larger presence in the geophysical magnetic surveying industry is the magnetic interference generated by the UAS and its impact on the quality of the recorded data. Detailed characterization of interference effects is therefore needed before remedial solutions can be proposed. A method for characterizing magnetic interference is demonstrated for a 21 kg, 3.7 m wingspan, 6 kW electric fixed-wing UAS purposely built for magnetic surveying. It involves mapping the spatial variations of the total magnetic intensity resulting from the interference sources on the UAS. Dynamic tests showed that the motor should be engaged and the aircraft control surfaces levelled prior to mapping. Experimental results reveal that the two strongest sources of magnetic interference are the cables connecting the motor to the batteries, and the servos. Combining three factors to assess the level of magnetic interference — the total magnetic intensity, 4th difference and vertical magnetic gradient — an index overlay shows that the magnetic sensor(s) should be located at least 50 cm away from the wingtips or tail to ensure an interference level of <2 nT, a 4th difference of <0.05 nT, and a gradient of <10 nT/m.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/JUVS-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

阻碍无人机系统(UASs)在地球物理磁测量行业中发挥更大作用的障碍之一是UAS产生的磁干扰及其对记录数据质量的影响。因此,在提出补救方案之前,需要详细描述干扰效应。本文演示了一种表征磁干扰的方法,用于专门用于磁测量的21公斤、3.7米翼展、6千瓦电动固定翼无人机。它涉及映射的空间变化总磁场强度产生的干扰源对无人机。动态测试表明,在测绘之前,电机应该被接合,飞机控制面应该被调平。实验结果表明,两个最强的磁干扰源是连接电机与电池的电缆和伺服器。结合三个因素来评估磁干扰水平——总磁强度、第四差和垂直磁梯度——一个指数叠加显示,磁传感器应位于距离翼尖或尾翼至少50厘米的地方,以确保干扰水平<2 nT,第四差<0.05 nT,梯度<10 nT/m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic interference testing method for an electric fixed-wing unmanned aircraft system (UAS)
One of the barriers preventing unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) from having a larger presence in the geophysical magnetic surveying industry is the magnetic interference generated by the UAS and its impact on the quality of the recorded data. Detailed characterization of interference effects is therefore needed before remedial solutions can be proposed. A method for characterizing magnetic interference is demonstrated for a 21 kg, 3.7 m wingspan, 6 kW electric fixed-wing UAS purposely built for magnetic surveying. It involves mapping the spatial variations of the total magnetic intensity resulting from the interference sources on the UAS. Dynamic tests showed that the motor should be engaged and the aircraft control surfaces levelled prior to mapping. Experimental results reveal that the two strongest sources of magnetic interference are the cables connecting the motor to the batteries, and the servos. Combining three factors to assess the level of magnetic interference — the total magnetic intensity, 4th difference and vertical magnetic gradient — an index overlay shows that the magnetic sensor(s) should be located at least 50 cm away from the wingtips or tail to ensure an interference level of <2 nT, a 4th difference of <0.05 nT, and a gradient of <10 nT/m.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
An examination of trends in the growing scientific literature on approaching wildlife with drones The utility of drones for studying polar bear behaviour in the Canadian Arctic: opportunities and recommendations Detection and tracking of belugas, kayaks and motorized boats in drone video using deep learning Potential Cyber Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Protections of Unmanned Vehicles Pilots’ Willingness to Operate in Urban Air Mobility Integrated Airspace: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1