《狄更斯与历史想象

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES DICKENS QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1353/dqt.2022.0012
L. Jackson
{"title":"《狄更斯与历史想象","authors":"L. Jackson","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines Dickens's fascination with old buildings, places and objects. Dickens himself suggests that these relics of antiquity serve as stimulus and scaffold for a triad of memory, imagination and story-telling and repeatedly refers to the \"mystery\" inherent in old buildings, which I link to the Romantic idea of the suggestive power of ruins. Dickens, admittedly, frequently satirizes those who fetishize/romanticize the past, which might appear at odds with his own interest in material antiquity. This satirical approach, however, amounts to Dickens reflecting on his own practice and indirectly laying claim to a historical \"new picturesque\"–a purposeful, moral use of the past, superior to that of his literary rivals. I illustrate this by comparing The Old Curiosity Shop with the contemporaneous The Tower of London by W. H. Ainsworth. I conclude by arguing that Dickens is also highly conscious of the debt which his animation of the inanimate owes to acts of historical imagination, something he subtly acknowledges in \"Meditations in Monmouth Street.\"","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":"39 1","pages":"138 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dickens and the Historical Imagination\",\"authors\":\"L. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dqt.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines Dickens's fascination with old buildings, places and objects. Dickens himself suggests that these relics of antiquity serve as stimulus and scaffold for a triad of memory, imagination and story-telling and repeatedly refers to the \\\"mystery\\\" inherent in old buildings, which I link to the Romantic idea of the suggestive power of ruins. Dickens, admittedly, frequently satirizes those who fetishize/romanticize the past, which might appear at odds with his own interest in material antiquity. This satirical approach, however, amounts to Dickens reflecting on his own practice and indirectly laying claim to a historical \\\"new picturesque\\\"–a purposeful, moral use of the past, superior to that of his literary rivals. I illustrate this by comparing The Old Curiosity Shop with the contemporaneous The Tower of London by W. H. Ainsworth. I conclude by arguing that Dickens is also highly conscious of the debt which his animation of the inanimate owes to acts of historical imagination, something he subtly acknowledges in \\\"Meditations in Monmouth Street.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":41747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DICKENS QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DICKENS QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2022.0012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了狄更斯对古老建筑、古老场所和古老物件的迷恋。狄更斯自己认为,这些古代遗迹是记忆、想象和讲故事的三位一体的刺激和支撑,并反复提到古老建筑固有的“神秘”,我将其与废墟的暗示力量的浪漫主义观点联系起来。诚然,狄更斯经常讽刺那些将过去神化/浪漫化的人,这可能与他自己对物质古代的兴趣不一致。然而,这种讽刺的方式相当于狄更斯对自己实践的反思,并间接地宣称自己是一种历史上的“新风景”——一种有目的的、道德的对过去的运用,优于他的文学对手。为了说明这一点,我将《老古玩店》与同时期w.h.安斯沃思的《伦敦塔》进行了比较。我的结论是,狄更斯也高度意识到他对无生命之物的生动描写归功于历史的想象,这一点他在《蒙茅斯街的沉思》中巧妙地承认了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dickens and the Historical Imagination
Abstract:This article examines Dickens's fascination with old buildings, places and objects. Dickens himself suggests that these relics of antiquity serve as stimulus and scaffold for a triad of memory, imagination and story-telling and repeatedly refers to the "mystery" inherent in old buildings, which I link to the Romantic idea of the suggestive power of ruins. Dickens, admittedly, frequently satirizes those who fetishize/romanticize the past, which might appear at odds with his own interest in material antiquity. This satirical approach, however, amounts to Dickens reflecting on his own practice and indirectly laying claim to a historical "new picturesque"–a purposeful, moral use of the past, superior to that of his literary rivals. I illustrate this by comparing The Old Curiosity Shop with the contemporaneous The Tower of London by W. H. Ainsworth. I conclude by arguing that Dickens is also highly conscious of the debt which his animation of the inanimate owes to acts of historical imagination, something he subtly acknowledges in "Meditations in Monmouth Street."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Dickens's Mudfog Charles Dickens and Georgina Hogarth: A Curious and Enduring Relationship by Christine Skelton (review) Writing to Control the Narrative: Charles Dickens, PTSD, and the Staplehurst Rail Crash The Year that Shaped the Victorian Age: Lives, Loves and Letters of 1845 by Michael Wheeler (review) The Dickens Checklist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1