{"title":"在农村长大的住院医师在培训中是否表现出较少的同理心下降?一份来自农村家庭医生的报告","authors":"W. Crump, C. Ziegler, R. Fricker","doi":"10.33470/2379-9536.1350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurPose: Our focus in this study was to determine if demographic variables, including rural upbringing, showed any association with a measure of empathy among family medicine residents at a rural site. Methods: We surveyed 40 residents annually using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) from 2016 to 2020 and compared scores between residents with rural vs. urban hometowns. The response rate was 98/99 (99%) of completed survey opportunities. Findings: There was no significant difference in JSE scores of rural vs. urban residents at baseline, and both groups showed a decline after the PG-1 year. However, the ruralraised residents showed a significantly different rebound after the PG-2 and PG-3 years, with the urban-raised residents showing a slight continuing decline (p=.023 and p=.033). ConClusion: These preliminary findings among family medicine residents at a rural site suggest that residents with rural backgrounds might regain empathy better than residents with urban backgrounds during their training. Further study should validate our findings and address possible explanations, including the importance of cultural concordance with the patient population served. This and other hypotheses will be explored in further studies with focus groups and other contemporaneous measures.","PeriodicalId":93035,"journal":{"name":"Marshall journal of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do medical residents with rural upbringing show less decline in empathy during training? A report from a rural family medicine residency\",\"authors\":\"W. Crump, C. Ziegler, R. Fricker\",\"doi\":\"10.33470/2379-9536.1350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurPose: Our focus in this study was to determine if demographic variables, including rural upbringing, showed any association with a measure of empathy among family medicine residents at a rural site. Methods: We surveyed 40 residents annually using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) from 2016 to 2020 and compared scores between residents with rural vs. urban hometowns. The response rate was 98/99 (99%) of completed survey opportunities. Findings: There was no significant difference in JSE scores of rural vs. urban residents at baseline, and both groups showed a decline after the PG-1 year. However, the ruralraised residents showed a significantly different rebound after the PG-2 and PG-3 years, with the urban-raised residents showing a slight continuing decline (p=.023 and p=.033). ConClusion: These preliminary findings among family medicine residents at a rural site suggest that residents with rural backgrounds might regain empathy better than residents with urban backgrounds during their training. Further study should validate our findings and address possible explanations, including the importance of cultural concordance with the patient population served. This and other hypotheses will be explored in further studies with focus groups and other contemporaneous measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marshall journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marshall journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33470/2379-9536.1350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们在本研究中的重点是确定人口变量,包括农村教育,是否与农村地区家庭医学居民的共情测量有任何关联。方法:2016 - 2020年,采用杰弗逊共情量表(Jefferson Scale of Empathy, JSE)对40名常住居民进行年度问卷调查,比较农村常住居民与城市常住居民的共情得分。回复率为98/99(99%)完成的调查机会。研究结果:农村和城市居民的JSE评分在基线时无显著差异,两组在PG-1年后均出现下降。然而,在PG-2和PG-3年之后,农村居民表现出明显不同的反弹,城市居民表现出轻微的持续下降(p=。p= 0.033)。结论:这些初步研究结果表明,农村家庭医学住院医师在培训期间比城市家庭医学住院医师更容易恢复共情能力。进一步的研究应该验证我们的发现,并解决可能的解释,包括与所服务的患者群体文化一致性的重要性。这一假设和其他假设将在焦点小组和其他同期措施的进一步研究中加以探讨。
Do medical residents with rural upbringing show less decline in empathy during training? A report from a rural family medicine residency
PurPose: Our focus in this study was to determine if demographic variables, including rural upbringing, showed any association with a measure of empathy among family medicine residents at a rural site. Methods: We surveyed 40 residents annually using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) from 2016 to 2020 and compared scores between residents with rural vs. urban hometowns. The response rate was 98/99 (99%) of completed survey opportunities. Findings: There was no significant difference in JSE scores of rural vs. urban residents at baseline, and both groups showed a decline after the PG-1 year. However, the ruralraised residents showed a significantly different rebound after the PG-2 and PG-3 years, with the urban-raised residents showing a slight continuing decline (p=.023 and p=.033). ConClusion: These preliminary findings among family medicine residents at a rural site suggest that residents with rural backgrounds might regain empathy better than residents with urban backgrounds during their training. Further study should validate our findings and address possible explanations, including the importance of cultural concordance with the patient population served. This and other hypotheses will be explored in further studies with focus groups and other contemporaneous measures.